Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:10:39.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical properties of vapor-grown carbon fiber composites with thermoplastic matrices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Gary G. Tibbetts  and
John J. McHugh
Gary G. Tibbetts*
Affiliation:
Physics and Physical Chemistry Department, General Motors Research and Development Center, Warren, Michigan 48090
John J. McHugh
Affiliation:
Physics and Physical Chemistry Department, General Motors Research and Development Center, Warren, Michigan 48090
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: gtibbett@gmr.com
Get access

Abstract

This article discusses the mechanical properties of vapor-grown carbon fiber (VGCF)/nylon and VGCF/polypropylene composites. Fibers in the as-produced condition yielded composites with marginally improved mechanical properties. Microscopic examination of these composites clearly showed regions of uninfiltrated fibers, which could account for the unsatisfactory mechanical properties. The infiltration of the fibers by both polymers was improved by carefully ball milling the raw fiber so as to reduce the diameter of the fiber clumps to less than 300 μm. Properties of composites made with ball-milled material were improved in every respect. VGCF reinforcement in nylon slightly improved the tensile strength and doubled the modulus, while VGCF in polypropylene doubled the tensile strength and quadrupled the modulus compared to unreinforced material. Moreover, the composites were sufficiently improved that differences in fiber surface preparation became important. For example, air-etched fibers and fibers covered with low concentrations of aromatics produced polypropylene composites with significantly better mechanical properties than did fibers whose surfaces were heavily coated with aromatics. Both the tensile strength and the modulus of the composites fabricated with clean fibers exceeded theoretical values for composites made with fibers randomly oriented in three dimensions, indicating that the injection-molding process oriented the fibers to some extent.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 7 , July 1999 , pp. 2871 - 2880
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Tibbetts, G.G., in Carbon Fibers Filaments and Composites (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990), p. 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Tibbetts, G.G., Doll, G.L., Gorkiewicz, D.W., Moleski, J.J., Perry, T.A., Dasch, C.J., and Balogh, M.J., Carbon 31, 1039 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Jacobsen, R.L., Tritt, T.M., Guth, J.R., Ehrlich, A.C., and Gillespie, D.J., Carbon 33, 1217 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Tibbetts, G.G. and Beetz, C.P. Jr, J. Appl. Phys. D 20, 292 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hatano, M., Ohsaki, T., and Arakawa, K., Ntl. SAMPE Symp. 30, 1467 (1985).Google Scholar
6.Dasch, C.J., Baxter, W.J., and Tibbetts, G.G., 21st Bienn. Conf. on Carbon, Buffalo, NY, 82 (1993).Google Scholar
7.Komatsu, Y. and Endo, M., Japanese Patent 1983–180615 (22 October 1983).Google Scholar
8.Tibbetts, G.G. and Gorkiewicz, D.W., Carbon 31, 809 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Carneiro, O.S., Covas, J.A., Bernardo, C.A., Caldiera, G., Van Hattum, F.W.J, Ting, J-M., Alig, R.L., and Lake, M.L., Comp. Sci. Technol. 58, 401 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Tennent, H.G., U.S. Patent No. 5 171 560 (15 December 1992).Google Scholar
11.Tibbetts, G.G., Bernardo, C.A., Gorkiewicz, D.W., and Alig, R.L., Carbon 32, 569 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Pederson, T., General Motors R&D Center, (personal communication).Google Scholar
13.Baxter, W.A., Metall. Trans. A 23A, 3045 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Mortensen, A., Masur, L.J., Cornie, J.A., and Flemings, M.C., Metall. Trans. A 20A, 2535 (1989).Google Scholar
15.McCrum, N.G., Buckley, C.P., and Bucknall, C.B.. Principles of Polymer Engineering (Oxford University Press, New York, 1980, p. 250).Google Scholar
16.Cox, H.L., Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 3, 72 (1982).Google Scholar
17.Bessant, G.A.R and Walker, P.L. Jr, Carbon 32, 1171 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar