Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-54gsr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-20T16:46:01.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical loss in a glass-epoxy composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Manfred Weller  and
Hassel Ledbetter
Manfred Weller
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Institut für Werkstoffwissenschaft, Stuttgart, Federal Republic of Germany
Hassel Ledbetter
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80303
Get access

Abstract

Using a computer-controlled inverted torsion pendulum at frequencies near 1 Hz, we determined the mechanical losses in a uniaxially fiber-reinforced composite. The composite comprised glass fibers in an epoxy-resin matrix. We studied three fiber contents: 0,41, and 49 vol.%. Three mechanical-loss peaks appeared: above 300 K, near 200 K, and near 130 K. They correspond closely to α, β, and γ peaks found previously in many polymers. We failed to see a mechanical-loss peak for either the glass or the glass-resin interface. Between 300 and 4 K, the torsion modulus increased in the resin by a factor of 3.30 and in the 0.49 glass-epoxy by a factor of 2.37.

Information

Type
Materials Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 5 , Issue 5 , May 1990 , pp. 913 - 915
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1Shimizu, K., in Composite Materials, Proceedings of Japan-United States Conference (Japanese Society of Composite Materials, Tokyo, 1981), p. 111.Google Scholar
2Igata, N. and Kohyama, A., Trans. Jpn. Soc. Compos. Mater. 2, 30 (1976).Google Scholar
3Ledbetter, H. M., J. Phys. (Paris) 46, C10–573 (1985).Google Scholar
4Ledbetter, H. M., Lei, Ming, and Austin, M.W., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 1972 (1986).Google Scholar
5McCrum, N. G., Read, B.E., and Williams, G., Anelastic and Dielectric Effects in Polymeric Solids (Wiley, London, 1967).Google Scholar
6 “Vibration Damping, 1984 Workshop Proceedings,” Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories Report AFWAL-TR-84–3064 (November 1984).Google Scholar
7Flom, Y. and Arsenault, R. J., J. Met. 38 (7), 31 (1986).Google Scholar
8Datta, S. K. and Ledbetter, H. M., in Mechanics of Material Interfaces (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986), pp. 131–142.Google Scholar
9Datta, S. K., Ledbetter, H. M., Shindo, Y., and Shah, A. H., in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (Plenum, New York, 1987), Vol. 6, pp. 1075–1084.Google Scholar
10Kasen, M. B., in Materials Studies for Magnetic Fusion Energy Applications at Low Temperatures-VIII, NBSIR 85–3075, National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, CO (1985), p. 87.Google Scholar
11Pollard, H. F., Sound Waves in Solids (Pion, London, 1988), p. 89.Google Scholar
12Varshni, Y. P., Phys. Rev. B 2, 3952 (1970).Google Scholar
13Wert, C. A. and Weller, M., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 6505 (1982).Google Scholar
14Wert, C. A. and Weller, M., J. Phys. (Paris) 46, C10–561 (1985).Google Scholar