Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:41:30.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical-mechanical Polishing of Copper Using Molybdenum Dioxide Slurry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Sharath Hegde ,
Udaya B. Patri  and
S.V. Babu
Sharath Hegde
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Center for Advanced Materials Processing,Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699
Udaya B. Patri
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Center for Advanced Materials Processing,Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699
S.V. Babu*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Center for Advanced Materials Processing,Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699
*
b) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: babu@clarkson.edu
Get access

Abstract

Slurries containing molybdenum oxide abrasives (MoO2, isoelectric point ∼pH 2) with potassium iodate (KIO3) as the oxidizing agent were used to polish copper disks and films, yielding relatively high removal rates. The relatively high copper removal rates observed were due to the in situ generation of I2 by the reaction between KIO3 and MoO2. The surface quality of the polished Cu films, however, was very poor with surface roughness values as high as 140 nm. A second polishing step using a dilute colloidal silica suspension containing H2O2, benzotriazole, and glycine at pH 4 improved the post-polish surface quality, final surface having surface roughness values as low as 0.35 nm.

Keywords

MetalMicroelectronicsSlurry

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 20 , Issue 9 , September 2005 , pp. 2553 - 2561
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1Lakshminarayanan, S., Stiegerwald, J., Price, D.T., Bourgeois, M., Chow, T.P., Gutmann, R.J. and Murarka, S.P.: Contact and via structures with copper interconnects fabricated using dual damascene technology. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 15, 307 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Singer, P.: Tantalum, copper and damascene: The future of interconnects. Semicond. Int. 21, 91 (1995).Google Scholar
3Ryan, J.G., Geffken, R.M., Poulin, N.R. and Paraszczak, J.R.: The evolution of interconnection technology at IBM. IBM J. Res. Develop. 39, 371 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Kaufman, F.B., Thompson, D.B., Broadie, R.E., Jaso, M.A., Guthrie, W.L., Pearson, D.J. and Small, M.B.: Chemical-mechanical polishing for fabricating w metal features as chip interconnects. J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 3460 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Gutmann, R.J., Stiegerwald, J.M., You, L., Price, D.T., Nierynck, J., Duquette, D.J. and Murarka, S.P.: Chemical-mechanical polishing of copper with oxide and polymer interlevel dielectrics. Thin Solid Films 270, 596 (1995).Google Scholar
6Stiegerwald, J.M., Murarka, S.P., Ho, J., Gutmann, R.J. and Duquette, D.J.: Mechanisms of copper removal during chemical mechanical polishing. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 2215 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Wolf, S.: Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, Vols. I and II (Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA 1986).Google Scholar
8Kondo, S., Sakuma, N., Homma, Y., Gota, Y., Ohashi, N., Yamaguchi, H. and Owada, N.: Abrasive-free polishing for copper damascene interconnection. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 3907 (2000).Google Scholar
9Matsuda, T., Takahashi, H., Tsurugaya, M., Miyazaki, K., Doy, T.K. and Kinoshita, M.: Characteristics of abrasive-free micelle slurry for copper CMP. J. Electrochem. Soc. 150(9), G532 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Kamigata, Y., Kurata, Y., Masuda, K., Amanokura, J., Yoshida, M. and Hanazono, M. Why abrasive free Cu slurry is promising? In Chemical-Mechanical Polishing 2001—Advances and Future Challenges, edited by Babu, S.V., Cadien, K.C., and Yano, H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 671, Warrendale, PA, 2001). p. M1.3.1.Google Scholar
11Patrick, W.J., Guthrie, W.L., Standley, C.L. and Schiable, P.M.: Application of chemical mechanical polishing to the fabrication of VLSI circuit interconnections. J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 1778 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Chemical-Mechanical Polishing 2000—Fundamentals and Materials Issues, edited by Singh, R.K., Bajaj, R., Moinpour, M., and Meuris, M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 613, Warrendale, PA, 2001).Google Scholar
13Lu, Z., Lee, S-H., Babu, S.V. and Matijević, E.: The use of monodispersed colloids in the polishing of copper and tantalum. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 261, 55 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Ramarajan, S., Hariharaputhiran, M., Her, Y-S. and Babu, S.V.: Hardness of sub-micrometer abrasive particles and polish rate measurements. Surf. Eng. 15, 324 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Ramarajan, S. Chemical-mechanical planarization of copper/tantalum for microelectronic applications. Ph.D. Dissertation, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, 2000.Google Scholar
16Jindal, A., Hegde, S., and Babu, S.V.: U.S. Patent No. 2003/0092271 A1 (May 15, 2003).Google Scholar
17Jindal, A., Hegde, S. and Babu, S.V.: Chemical mechanical polishing using mixed abrasive slurries. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 5, G48 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Jindal, A., Hegde, S. and Babu, S.V.: Chemical mechanical polishing of dielectric films using mixed abrasive slurries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 150, G314 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Braithwaite, E.R. and Haber, J.: Molybdenum: An Outline of its Chemistry and Uses (Elsevier, Burlington, MA, 1994), p. 488.Google Scholar
20Mitchell, P.C.H. Molybdenum and molybdenum compounds, Chpt. 7, Molybdenum compounds, in Ullann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 5th edition, Vol. A16: Magnetic Materials to Mutagenic Agents, edited by Elvers, B., Hawkins, S., and Schulz, G. (VCH Publishers, New York, NY, 1990) pp. 675–682.Google Scholar
21Aveston, J., Anacker, E.W. and Johnson, J.S.: Hydrolysis of molybdenum (VI). Ultracentrifugation, acidity measurements, and raman spectra of polymolybdates. Inorg. Chem. 3, 735 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Busey, R.H., Keller, O.L. Jr.: Structure of the aqueous pertechnetate ion by Raman and infrared spectra of crystalline KTcO4, Na2MoO4, Na2WO4, Na2MoO4⋅2H2O, and Na2WO4⋅2H2O. J. Chem. Phys. 41, 215 (1964).Google Scholar
23Christian, G.D. and O’Reilly, J.E. In Instrumental Analysis, 2nd ed., edited by Christian, G.D. and O’Reilly, J.E. (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, 1986) p. 902.Google Scholar
24Savadogo, O. and Levesque, S.: The hydrogen evolution reaction in an acid medium on nickel electrodeposited with PMo12O403− or MoO42−. J. Appl. Electrochem. 21, 457 (1991).Google Scholar
25Rothschild, A., Debiemme-Chouvy, C. and Etcheberry, A.: Study of the interaction at rest potential between silicotungstic heteropolyanion solution and GaAs surface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 135, 65 (1998).Google Scholar
26Keita, B. and Nadjo, L.: New aspects of the electrochemistry of heteropolyacids: Part II. Coupled electron and proton transfers in the reduction of silicotungstic species. J. Electroanal. Chem. 217, 287 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Savadogo, O. and Allard, C.: The hydrogen evolution reaction in an acid medium on nickel electrodeposited with SiW12O404− or SiMo12O404− from electrolytes of various anionic compositions. J. Appl. Electrochem. 21, 73 (1991).Google Scholar
28Savadogo, O. and Carrier, F.: The hydrogen evolution reaction in basic medium on iron electrodeposited with heteropolyacids. J. Appl. Electrochem. 22, 437 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Babu, S.V., Hegde, S., Patri, U., Hong, Y., and Jha, S.: U.S. Patent No. 2005/0026444 A1 (February 3, 2005).Google Scholar
30Hariharaputhiran, M., Li, Y., Ramarajan, S. and Babu, S.V.: Chemical mechanical polishing of Ta. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 3(2), 95 (2000).Google Scholar
31Bhuvanesh, N.S. and Gopalakrishnan, J.: Solid-state chemistry of early transition-metal oxides containing d0 and d1 cations. J. Mater. Chem. 7, 2297 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Steigerwald, J.M., Murarka, S.P. and Gutmann, R.J.: Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997), p. 143.Google Scholar
33Li, Y. and Babu, S.V.: Chemical mechanical polishing of copper and tantalum in potassium iodate-based slurries. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 4(2), G20 (2001).Google Scholar
34Luo, Q.: Copper dissolution behavior in acidic iodate solutions. Langmuir 16, 5154 (2000).Google Scholar
35Du, T., Tamboli, D., Luo, Y. and Desai, V.: Electrochemical characterization of copper chemical mechanical planarization in KIO3 slurry. Appl. Surf. Sci. 229, 167 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Liu, Y., Qian, Y., Zhang, M., Chen, Z. and Wang, C.: Preparation of nano-sized amorphous molybdenum dioxide powders by use of γ-ray radiation method. Mater. Res. Bull. 31, 1029 (1996).Google Scholar
37Wehrer, P., Bigey, C. and Hilaire, L.: Catalytic reactions of n-hexane and 1-hexene on molybdenum dioxide. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 243, 109 (2003).Google Scholar
38Scott, W.W. and Furman, N.H.: Standard Methods of Chemical Analysis (D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, 1939).Google Scholar
39Singh, R.K. and Lee, S-M.: U.S. Patent No. 2003/0159362 A1 (August 28, 2003).Google Scholar
40Luo, Q. and Babu, S.V.: Dishing effects during chemical mechanical polishing of copper in acidic media. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 4639 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Aramaki, K., Kiuchi, T., Sumiyoshi, T. and Nishihara, H.: Surface-enhanced Raman scattering and impedance studies on the inhibition of copper corrosion in sulphate solutions by 5-substitued benzotriazoles. Corros. Sci. 32, 593 (1991).Google Scholar
42Tromans, D.: Aqueous potential-pH equilibria in copper-benzotriazole systems. J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, L42 (1998).Google Scholar
43Kallay, N. and Matijević, E.: Adsorption at solid/solution interfaces. 1. Interpretation of surface complexation of oxalic and citric acids with hematite. Langmuir 1, 195 (1985).Google Scholar
44Zhang, Y., Kallay, N. and Matijević, E.: Interactions of metal hydrous oxides with chelating agents. 7. Hematite-oxalic acid and -citric acid systems. Langmuir 1, 201 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Neirynck, J.M., Yang, G-R., Murarka, S.P. and Gutmann, R.J.: The addition of surfactant to slurry for polymer CMP: Effects on polymer surface, removal rate and underlying Cu. Thin Solid Films 290, 447 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Bajaj, R., Zutshi, A., Surana, R., Naik, M. and Pan, T.: Integration challenges for CMP of copper. MRS Bull. 27(10), 776 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Li, H., VanHaneham, M. and Quanci, J. Slurry developmemt for Cu/ultra low k CMP, in Chemical-Mechanical Planarization 2003, edited by Boning, D.S., Devriendt, K., Oliver, M.R., Stein, D.J., and Vos, I. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 767, Warrendale, PA, 2003), F5.3, p. 199.Google Scholar
48Li, Y. Mechanisms of chemical-mechanical planarization of copper/tantalum thin films using fumed silica abrasives. Ph.D. Dissertation, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Hegde, S. and Babu, S.V.: Provisional U.S. Patent application filed (January 2002).Google Scholar
50Hegde, S. and Babu, S.V.: Removal of shallow and deep scratches and pits from polished copper films. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 6(10), G126 (2003).Google Scholar