Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-j7khd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T09:11:53.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved hardness and wear properties of B-ion implanted polycarbonate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

E.H. Lee ,
Gopal R. Rao  and
L.K. Mansur
E.H. Lee
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Gopal R. Rao*
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
L.K. Mansur
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
*
a)On assignment to ORNL from Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849.
Get access

Abstract

Polycarbonate (Lexan) was implanted with 100 and 200 keV B+ ions to doses of 0.26, 0.78, and 2.6 × 1015 ions/cm2 at room temperature (<100 °C). Mechanical characterization of implanted materials was carried out by nanoindentation and sliding wear tests. The results showed that the hardness of implanted polycarbonate increased with increasing ion energy and dose, attaining hardness up to 3.2 GPa at a dose of 2.6 × 1015 ions/cm2 for 200 keV ions, which is more than 10 times that of the unimplanted polymer. Wear properties were characterized using a reciprocating tribometer with nylon, brass, and SAE 52100 Cr-steel balls with 0.5 and 1 N normal forces for 10000 cycles. The wear mode varied widely as a function of ion energy, dose, wear ball type, and normal load. For given ion energy, load, and ball type conditions, there was an optimum dose that produced the greatest wear resistance and lowest friction coefficient. For polycarbonate implanted with 0.78 × 1015 ions/cm2, the nylon ball produced no wear after 10000 cycles. Moreover, the overall friction coefficient was reduced by over 40% by implantation. The results suggest that the potential of ion-beam technology for improving polycarbonate is significant, and that surface-sensitive mechanical properties can be tailored to meet the requirements for applications demanding hardness, wear, and abrasion resistance.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 7 , July 1992 , pp. 1900 - 1911
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Lee, E. H., Lewis, M. B., Blau, P. J., and Mansur, L. K., J. Mater. Res. 6, 610 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lewis, M. B., Allen, W. R., Buhl, R. A., Packan, N. H., Cook, S. W., and Mansur, L. K., Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Physics Research B43, 243 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ziegler, J. F., Biersack, J. P., and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids (Pergamon, 1985). The version of TRIM used in this work was TRIM-88.Google Scholar
4.Hutchings, R. and Oliver, W. C., Wear 92, 143 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Oliver, W. C., MRS Bulletin Sept/Oct., 15 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bowman, J. and Bevis, M., Colloid & Polymer Sci. 255, 954 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pethica, J. B., Hutchings, R., and Oliver, W. C., Philos. Mag. 48 (4), 593 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Bhattacharya, A. K. and Nix, W. D., Int. J. Solids Structures 24 (12), 1287 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Handbook of Plastic Test Methods, 3rd ed., edited by Brown, Roger P. (Longman Scientific & Technical, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1988), Chap. 8.Google Scholar
11.Lawn, B. R. and Howes, V. R., J. Mater. Sci. 16, 2745 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Balta-Calleja, F. J., Martinez-Salazar, J., and Rueda, D. R., in Polymers: An Encyclopedic Sourcebook of Engineering Properties, edited by Kroschwitz, Jacqueline I. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987), p. 415.Google Scholar
13.Venkatesan, T., Calcagno, L., Elman, B. S., and Foti, G., Ion Beam Modification of Insulators, edited by Mazzoldi, P. and Arnold, G. W. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987), Chap. 8, p. 301.Google Scholar
14.Brown, W. L., Radiat. Eff. 98, 115 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Hall, T. M., Wagner, A., and Thompson, L. F., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 16 (6), 1889 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.O'Donnell, J. H., The Effects of Radiation on High-Technology Polymers, edited by Elsa Reichmanis and O'Donnell, J. H., ACS Symposium Series 381 (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1989), Chap. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
17.Tsai, Hsiao-chu and Bogy, D. B., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 5 (6), 3287 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Reichmanis, Elsa, The Effects of Radiation on High-Technology Polymers, edited by Reichmanis, Elsa and O'Donnell, J. H., ACS Symposium Series 381 (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1989), Chap. 9, p. 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Lingnau, J., Dammel, R., and Theis, J., Solid State Technol. 32 (9), 105 (1989) and 32 (10), 107 (1989).Google Scholar
20.Bowden, F. P. and Tabor, D., The Friction and Lubrication of Solids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, Part I, 1950 and Part II, 1964).Google Scholar
21. John Schey, A., Tribology in Metalworking (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1984).Google Scholar
22.Peterson, M. B. and Ramalingam, B., Fundamentals of Friction and Wear of Materials, edited by Rigney, D. A. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1980), p. 131.Google Scholar