Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-d7bbv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-10T20:05:41.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching leadership from a social constructionist perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2014

Jon Billsberry
Jon Billsberry*
Affiliation:
Deakin Graduate School of Business, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
*
Corresponding author: j.billsberry@deakin.edu.au, www.jonbillsberry.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traditional approaches to leadership assert that leadership is a definite quality of leaders. In contrast, the social constructionist approach conceptualises leadership as a quality of observers. The goal of this paper is to show how this philosophical base can be used to create a teaching strategy for leadership. In this strategy, there are three learning objectives: understanding the philosophical approach; revealing students’ lay theories of leadership; and, skill development. The lessons revolve around understanding how leadership perceptions form so that students appreciate how they are influenced and, in turn, how they might influence other people's perceptions of themselves.

Keywords

leadershipleadership developmentmanagement educationsocial construction

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , November 2013 , pp. 679 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ambrosini, V., Billsberry, J., Collier, N. (2009). Teaching soft issues in strategic management with films: Arguments and suggestions. International Journal of Management Education, 8(1), 63–72.Google Scholar
Blaikie, N. (2008). Approaches to social enquiry (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
DeRue, D. S., Wellman, N. (2009). Developing leaders via experience: The role of developmental challenge, learning orientation, and feedback availability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 859–875.Google Scholar
Doh, J. P. (2003). Can leadership be taught? Perspectives from management educators. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(1), 54–67.Google Scholar
Duke, D. L. (1998). The nonnative context of organizational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 165–195.Google Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T., Grant, D. (2010). The social construction of leadership: A sailing guide. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 171–210.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series), 56, 167–198.Google Scholar
Gill, R. (2006). Theory and practice of leadership. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Grint, K. (1997). Reading Tolstoy's wave. In K. Grint (Ed.), Leadership: Classical, contemporary, and critical approaches (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grint, K. (2000). The arts of leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grint, K. (2005). Leadership: Limits and possibilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Grint, K., Jackson, B. (2010). Toward “socially constructive” social constructions of leadership. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 348–355.Google Scholar
Keenoy, T., Oswick, C., Grant, D. (2000). Discourse, epistemology and organizations. Organization, 7, 542–544.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (1990). What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 103–111.Google Scholar
Kress, G., van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Lockwood, P., Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 91–103.Google Scholar
Meindl, J. R. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 329–341.Google Scholar
Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, J. A. (2003). Profiles in leadership: Enhancing learning through model and theory building. Journal of Management Education, 27(3), 344–361.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 255–289.Google Scholar
Middlebrooks, A., Allen, S. J. (2009). The education of leadership. Journal of Leadership Education, 8(1), viii–xxii.Google Scholar
Nahavandi, A. (2006). Teaching leadership to first-year students in a learning community. Journal of Leadership Education, 5(2), 14–27.Google Scholar
Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
O'Leonard, K. (2007). The corporate learning factbook: Statistics, benchmarks, and analysis of the U.S. Corporate training market. Oakland, CA: Bersin & Associates.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge: Overcoming barriers to student understanding. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33–47). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Posner, B. Z. (2009). From inside out: Beyond teaching about leadership. Journal of Leadership Education, 8(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Prawat, R. S., Floden, R. E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J. (2001). The constructions of social constructionism. In S. E. Sjöstrand, J. Sandberg & M. Tyrstrup (Eds.), Invisible management: The social construction of leadership (pp. 28–48). London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Wilk, J. (2010). Evidence: Where scholarship meets artistry. Journal of Management Education, 34(2), 195–199.Google Scholar
Shackleton, V. (1995). Business leadership. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sitzmann, T.Ely, K., Brown, K. G., Bauer, K. N. (2010). The construct validity of self-assessment of learning: Meta-analytic evidence. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 169–191.Google Scholar
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wright, A. L., Gilmore, A. (2012). Threshold concepts and conceptions: Student learning in introductory management courses. Journal of Management Education, 36(5), 612–633.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Zoller, H. M., Fairhurst, G. T. (2007). Resistance as leadership: A critical, discursive perspective. Human Relations, 60, 1331–1360.Google Scholar