Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-10T01:36:49.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International alliance structure and effectiveness: evidence from law firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2023

Rany Salvoldi
Affiliation:
Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box: 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
David M. Brock*
Affiliation:
Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box: 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
*
Author for correspondence: David M. Brock, E-mail: dmb@bgu.ac.il

Abstract

International alliances are important strategic vehicles to build geographic scope and enter foreign markets, especially for firms lacking the resources or facing limitations to direct foreign expansion. Addressing recent calls to study alliance structure, we investigate the design parameters of nonequity international alliances and their performance implications. Building on the resource-based view of the firm, we theorize the effect of three key structural dimensions – formalization, interface, and specialization – on firm effectiveness. Our empirical work focusses on the legal service industry where international interfirm alliances are common, and resources like expert workers and knowledge are essential. We study 121 French, German, Italian, and Spanish law firms; and our data include the structural features of the alliances to which they belong, as well as various measures of firm effectiveness. Our analyses via structural equation modelling point toward the importance of informality and strong interface for effectiveness in these contexts. This study contributes to a finer understanding of international alliances by directly addressing the structural variation among nonequity international alliances, and analyzes their implications for firms. We thus respond to calls to investigate structural dimensions of alliances, operationalizing relevant dimensions of alliance organizational structure. Second, we add to understanding of the performance effects of international alliances, showing the benefits of individual structural parameters for firm effectiveness. Finally, we extend research on the use of international alliances as a strategic vehicle to enter foreign markets, capturing essential aspects of the internal arrangements of these interorganizational collaborative relationships, and thus adding to understanding of this strategic entry mode.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

2016 report on the state of the legal market. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.law.georgetown.edu/news/2016-report-on-state-legal-market.cfmGoogle Scholar
Albers, S., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). Strategic alliance structures: An organization design perspective. Journal of Management, 42(3), 582614.10.1177/0149206313488209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, T., Khalid, S., Shahzad, K., & Larimo, J. (2021). Managing international joint ventures to improve performance: The role of structural and social mechanisms. International Business Review, 30(3), 101791.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411423.10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anker, S., & Lurie, Y. (2022). On the professional authority of quality engineers and the gaps in their epistemic and organizational authority. Journal of Professions and Organization, 9(1), 6276. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joab020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandara, A., Freeman, S., & Schroder, W. (2012). Legitimacy and accelerated internationalisation: An Indian perspective. Journal of World Business, 47, 623634.10.1016/j.jwb.2011.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99120.10.1177/014920639101700108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beamish, P. W., & Lupton, N. C. (2016). Cooperative strategies in international business and management: Reflections on the past 50 years and future directions. Journal of World Business, 51, 163175.10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, N. (2015). ‘The future of networks’. The lawyer. Retrieved 1 May 2017 from LexisNexis Academic Database.Google Scholar
Blagoeva, D. H., Jensen, PDØ, & Merchant, H. (2020). Services in international business studies: A replication and extension of Merchant and Gaur (2008). Management International Review, 60, 427457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-020-00417-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, B., Faems, D., & Noseleit, F. (2017). Alliance concentration in multinational companies: Examining alliance portfolios, firm structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 22982309.10.1002/smj.2652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boussebaa, M. (2022). Unsettling West-centrism in the study of professional service firms. Human Relations. doi: 10.1177/00187267221128262Google Scholar
Boussebaa, M., & Morgan, G. (2015). Internationalization of professional service firms. In Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J. & Hinings, B. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 7191). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795817. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20159624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broschak, J. P. (2015). Client relationships in professional service firms. In Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J. & Hinings, B. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 304326). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J.-F. (2007). Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33(3), 395425.10.1177/0149206307300817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouthers, K. D., & Nakos, G. (2004). SME entry mode choice and performance: A transaction cost perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 229247.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00041.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruneel, J., & De cock, R. (2016). Entry mode research and SMEs: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Small Business Management, 54, 135167. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, M. (2018). ‘The future of networks’. The lawyer. Retrieved 24 August 2019 from LexisNexis Academic Database.Google Scholar
Ceci, F., & Iubatti, D. (2012). Personal relationships and innovation diffusion in SME networks: A content analysis approach. Research Policy, 41(3), 565579.10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432446.10.2307/30040731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chang, F., Jack, R., & Webster, C. (2017). Pre and post-entry resource needs for international entrepreneurs: The role of government and industry networks. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(2), 186205. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2016.52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contractor, F., Kundu, S., & Hsu, C. C. (2003). A three-stage theory of international expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 518.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contractor, F. J., & Reuer, J. J. (2014). Structuring and governing alliances: New directions for research. Global Strategy Journal, 4(4), 241256.10.1002/gsj.1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deephouse, D. L., Newburry, W., & Soleimani, A. (2016). The effects of institutional development and national culture on cross-national differences in corporate reputation. Journal of World Business, 51(3), 463473.10.1016/j.jwb.2015.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devarakonda, S. V., & Reuer, J. J. (2018). Knowledge sharing and safeguarding in R&D collaborations: The role of steering committees in biotechnology alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 19121934. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The directory of the future. (2008). Legal week. Retrieved from http://www.legalweek.com/sites/legalweek/2008/02/27/the-directory-of-the-future/Google Scholar
Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J., & Hinings, B. (2015). Researching professional service firms. In Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J. & Hinings, B. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 122). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erramilli, M. K., Agarwal, S., & Dev, C. S. (2002). Choice between non-equity entry modes: An organizational capability perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 223242.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, E. (2011). The effect of strategic alliance knowledge complementarity on new product innovativeness in China. Organization Science, 22(1), 158172.10.1287/orsc.1090.0512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. (2010). Global architects: Learning and innovation through communities and constellations of practice. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42/12, 28422858.10.1068/a4311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. (2015). Knowledge and learning in professional service firms. In Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J. P., & Hinings, B. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 425451). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J., Beaverstock, J. V., Muzio, D., & Taylor, P. J. (2008). Global law firms: Globalization and organizational spaces of cross-border legal work. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 28(3), 455488.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J., Henriksen, L. F., & Seabrooke, L. (2021). How professional actions connect and protect. Journal of Professions and Organization, 8(2), 214227. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joab008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankort, H., & Hagedoorn, J. (2019). Characteristics of innovation-driven interfirm alliances, 1957–2006: Analysis and research directions. In Contractor, F. & Reuer, J. (Eds.), Frontiers of strategic alliance research: Negotiating, structuring and governing partnerships (pp. 370389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108236188.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friendly Fire. (2012). The lawyer. Retrieved April 26, 2017 (link).Google Scholar
García-Canal, E., Duarte, C. L., Criado, J. R., & Llaneza, A. V. (2002). Accelerating international expansion through global alliances: A typology of cooperative strategies. Journal of World Business, 37, 91107.10.1016/S1090-9516(02)00069-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organizations. Management Learning, 29(3), 273297.10.1177/1350507698293002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Globerman, S., & Nielsen, B. B. (2007). Equity versus non-equity international strategic alliances involving Danish firms: An empirical investigation of the relative importance of partner and host country determinants. Journal of International Management, 13, 449471.10.1016/j.intman.2007.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, E., Barnes, B. R., & Mahmood, T. (2016). A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals. International Business Review, 25, 1527.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, M. (2022). Accepting the future as ever-changing: Professionals’ sensemaking about artificial intelligence. Journal of Professions and Organization, 9(1), 7799. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joab022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481510.10.1086/228311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organisational capability as knowledge integration. Organisation Science, 7(4), 375387.10.1287/orsc.7.4.375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 6184.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Brown, J. (1990). P2 form strategic management: Corporate practices in professional partnerships. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 725755.10.2307/256288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Li, S. X., Prakash, R., & Deephouse, D. L. (2005). Reputation, diversification, and organizational explanations of performance in professional service firms. Organization Science, 16(6), 661673.10.1287/orsc.1050.0159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., & Miller, D. (2010). Tackling design anew: Getting back to the heart of organizational theory. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 7888.Google Scholar
Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Singh, H. (2009). The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 12131233.10.1002/smj.786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781814.10.2307/2393616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Q., Meadows, M., Angwin, D., Gomes, E., & Child, J. (2020). Strategic alliance research in the era of digital transformation: Perspectives on future research. British Journal of Management, 31, 589617.10.1111/1467-8551.12406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117128.10.1002/smj.4250110204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, M. (1988). The measuring of organizational effectiveness: Multiple domains and constituencies. Management International Review, 28(2), 2840.Google Scholar
Hollender, L., Zapkau, F. B., & Schwens, C. (2017). SME foreign market entry mode choice and foreign venture performance: The moderating effect of international experience and product adaptation. International Business Review, 26, 250263.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm-Petersen, C., Møller, A. M., & Buch, M. S. (2021). Hijacking institutional logics in the implementation of a cancer trial. Journal of Professions and Organization, 8(3), 295310. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joab013Google Scholar
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 5360.Google Scholar
Hoyle, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 429440.10.1037/0022-006X.62.3.429CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Griffith, D. A., Chabowski, B. R., Hamman, M. K., Dykes, B. J., … Cavusgil, S. T. (2008). An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 10641080.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hydle, K. M., & Brock, D. M. (2020). Global collaboration in knowledge intensive firms: The role of activity configurations. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(4), 519535. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, K., Gilstrap, C., Drnevich, P., & Sunny, M. (2022). The acquisition of capabilities: How firms use dynamic and ordinary capabilities to manage uncertainty. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(3), 564586. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2022.23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 623.10.1037/a0014694CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, X., Bao, Y., Xie, Y., & Gao, S. (2016). Partner trustworthiness, knowledge flow in strategic alliances, and firm competitiveness: A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69, 804814.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, X., & Li, Y. (2008). The relationship between organizational learning and firms’ financial performance in strategic alliances: A contingency approach. Journal of World Business, 43, 365379.10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22, 911945.10.2307/259249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Borgatti, S. P. (1998). Professional service constellations: How strategies and capabilities influence collaborative stability and change. Organization Science, 9(3), 396410.10.1287/orsc.9.3.396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juasrikul, S., Sahaym, A., Yim, H., & Liu, R. L. (2018). Do cross-border alliances with MNEs from developed economies create firm value for MNEs from emerging economies? Journal of Business Research, 93, 98110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanos, A. G. (2003). Complexity, identity and the value of knowledge-intensive exchanges. Journal of Management Studies, 40(7), 18711890.10.1111/1467-6486.00403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedia, B. L., & Lahiri, S. (2007). International outsourcing of services: A partnership model. Journal of International Management, 13, 2237.10.1016/j.intman.2006.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. (2021). The impact of common clients on employee mobility and organizational growth. Journal of Professions and Organization, 8(2), 109127. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joab005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B. K., & Jensen, M. (2011). How product order affects market identity: Repertoire ordering in the U.S. opera market. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 238256.10.1177/0001839211427535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., & Kim, B. (2017). Risk-based perspective on the choice of alliance governance in high-tech industries. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(5), 671688. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2016.63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., & Parkhe, A. (2009). Competing and cooperating similarity in global strategic alliances: An exploratory examination. British Journal of Management, 20, 363376.10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00580.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinbaum, D., Kupper, L., & Muller, K. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston, MA: PWS Publishing.Google Scholar
Koktener, B., & Tuncalp, D. (2021). Old game, new rules and ‘odd friends’: Digitalization, jurisdictional conflicts, and boundary work of auditors in a ‘Big Four’ professional service firm. Journal of Professions and Organization, 8(3), 349373.Google Scholar
Kurt, Y., & Kurt, M. (2020). Social network analysis in international business research: An assessment of the current state of play and future research directions. International Business Review, 29(2), 101633.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 78104.10.2307/2393534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufs, K., & Schwens, C. (2014). Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Business Review, 23, 11091126.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., Cousins, P. D., & Handfield, R. B. (2009). Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: The effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 156172.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00343.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. (2019). All roads lead to Rome: Internationalization strategies of Chinese law firms. Journal of Professions and Organization, 6(2), 156178. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joz005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Jiang, F., Pei, Y., & Jinag, N. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance success: The contingency role of relational factors. Journal of Business Research, 72, 4656.10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S., Blocq, D., Honari, A., & Au, A. (2022). Professional flows: Lateral moves of law firm partners in Hong Kong, 1994–2018. Journal of Professions and Organization, 9(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joac001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C.-L. E., Ghauri, P. N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2010). Understanding the impact of relational capital and organizational learning on alliance outcomes. Journal of World Business, 45, 237249.10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lojacono, G., Misani, N., & Tallman, S. (2017). Offshoring, local market entry, and the strategic context of cross-border alliances: The impact on the governance mode. International Business Review, 26, 435447.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Look Before You Leap. (2004). Legal week. Retrieved 1 May 2017, from LexisNexis database.Google Scholar
López-Duarte, C., González-Loureiro, M., Vidal-Suárez, M. M., & González-Díaz, B. (2016). International strategic alliances and national culture: Mapping the field and developing a research agenda. Journal of World Business, 51, 511524.10.1016/j.jwb.2016.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowendahl, B. (2000). Strategic management of professional service firms. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 565586.10.1002/smj.184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lui, S. S., & Ngo, H.-Y. (2004). The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances. Journal of Management, 30(4), 471485. doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, N. K., Agarwal, J., & Ulgado, F. M. (2003). Internationalization and entry modes: A multitheoretical framework and research propositions. Journal of International Marketing, 11(4), 131. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.11.4.1.20144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, N., & Morris, T. (2009). Heterogeneity in professional service firms. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 895922.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00826.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 7187.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mawdsley, J., & Somaya, D. (2015). Strategy and strategic alignment in professional service firms. In Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J. P. & Hinings, B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 213237). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Musteen, M., Datta, D. K., & Francis, J. (2014). Early internationalization by firms in transition economies into developed markets: The role of international networks. Global Strategy Journal, 4(3), 221237.10.1002/gsj.1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthusamy, S. K., & White, M. A. (2006). Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organization Studies, 26(3), 415441. doi: 10.1177/0170840605050874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muzio, D., & Faulconbridge, J. (2013). The global professional service firm: ‘One firm’ models versus (Italian) distant institutionalized practices. Organization Studies, 34(7), 897925.10.1177/0170840612470232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242266.10.2307/259373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Networks and Associations; Well-Connected. (2010). The lawyer. LexisNexis Academic Database accessed 10 May 2017.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. B. (2005). The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in the strategies alliances. Journal of Business Research, 58, 11941204.10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 534.10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. (2020). Protective or connective professionalism? How connected professionals can (still) act as autonomous and authoritative experts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 7(2), 205223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novarese, A. (2011). Five things…part II – the legal directories. Legal week. Retrieved from http://www.legalweek.com/sites/legalweek/2011/01/21/five-things-part-ii-the-legal-directories/Google Scholar
Oh, Y., & Yoo, N. (2022). Effective cooperation modes based on cultural and market similarities in interfirm relationships. Journal of International Management, 28, 100891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxley, J., & Wada, T. (2009). Alliance structure and the scope of knowledge transfer: Evidence from U.S.-Japan agreements. Management Science, 55(4), 635649. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y., & Tse, D. K. (2000). The hierarchical model of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 535554.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolella, L., & Durand, R. (2016). Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 330351.10.5465/amj.2013.0651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prashantham, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2015). Choose your friends carefully: Home-country ties and new venture internationalization. Management International Review, 55(2), 207234.10.1007/s11575-015-0244-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prashantham, S., & Dhanaraj, C. (2010). The dynamic influence of social capital on the international growth of new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 967994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00904.xGoogle Scholar
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229252.10.1093/jopart/mum015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., & Hinings, C. R. (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 65105.10.2307/2391262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasheed, H. S. (2005). Foreign entry mode and performance: The moderating effects of environment. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(1), 4154.10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00124.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuer, J. J., & Ariño, A. (2002). Contractual renegotiations in strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 28, 4768.10.1177/014920630202800104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, N. F., Schmidt, R., Ladwig, T. J., & Wulhorst, F. (2017). A critical perspective on the measurement of performance in the empirical multinationality and performance literature. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 13(2), 94118.10.1108/cpoib-06-2013-0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripollés, M., & Blesa, A. (2020). And yet, non-equity cooperative entries do improve international performance: Uncovering the role of networks’ social capital. Small Business Economies, 55, 761776. doi: doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00186-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, M. J., Katsikeas, C. S., & Bello, D. C. (2008). Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: The role of organizational complexity. Organization Science, 19(4), 647665.10.1287/orsc.1070.0329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (2013). Mapping world cultures: Cluster formation, sources and implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9), 867897.10.1057/jibs.2013.42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 136.10.18637/jss.v048.i02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sako, M., Qian, M., & Attolini, J. (2022). Future of professional work: Evidence from legal jobs in Britain and the United States. Journal of Professions and Organization, 9(2), 143169.10.1093/jpo/joac011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvoldi, R., & Brock, D. M. (2019). Opening the black box of PSF network internationalization: An exploration of law firm networks. Journal of Professions and Organization, 6(3), 304322.Google Scholar
Schminke, M., Cropanzano, R., & Rupp, D. E. (2002). Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 881905.10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00034-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323338.10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, M. (1998). Limits to bureaucratic growth: The density dependence of organizational rule births. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 845876.10.2307/2393618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal-Horn, S., & Dean, A. (2007). The globalization of law firms: Managerial issues. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(2), 206219. doi: 10.1108/09564230710737835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal-Horn, S., & Dean, A. (2011). The rise of super-elite law firms: Towards global strategies. The Service Industries Journal, 31(2), 195213. doi: 10.1080/02642060802706956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, V. M., & Erramilli, M. K. (2004). Resource-based explanation of entry mode choice. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 12(1), 118.10.1080/10696679.2004.11658509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebert, S. (2020). Symbolic demarcation: The role of status symbols in preserving inter-professional boundaries. Journal of Professions and Organization, 7(1), 4769. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughters and Hengeler Lock Horn Over Best Friend Choices. (2008). The lawyer. Retrieved April 27, 2017 from LexisNexis Academic Database.Google Scholar
Susskind, R. E, & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198713395.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 537556. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 3567.10.2307/2393808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hoorn, A., & Maseland, R. (2016). How institutions matter for international business: Institutional distance effects vs institutional profile effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 374381.10.1057/jibs.2016.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801814.10.2307/258398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Towards a theory and taxonomy of knowledge intensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 155174.Google Scholar
von Nordenflycht, A., Malhotra, N., & Morris, T. (2015). Sources of homogeneity and heterogeneity across professional services. In Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J. & Hinings, B. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 135160). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, , (2016). ‘The question for us will be: Does it make sense to be in London?’ European independents on Brexit. Legal week. Retrieved May 1, 2017, (link).Google Scholar
Weber, C. E., Kortkamp, C., Maurer, I., & Hummers, E. (2022). Boundary work in response to professionals’ contextual constraints: Micro-strategies in interprofessional collaboration. Organization Studies, 43(9), 14531477. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221074135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486175 10.1002/smj.4250050207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmann, C. M., Hunt, S. D., & Arnett, D. B. (2009). Explaining alliance success: Competences, resources, relational factors, and resource-advantage theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 743756.10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, N., & Wang, K. (2021). Adopting robot lawyer? The extending artificial intelligence robot lawyer technology acceptance model for legal industry by an exploratory study. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(5), 867885. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2018.81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarrow, D., & Decker, C. (2012). Assessing the economic significance of the professional legal services sector in the European Union. Retrieved from http://www.ccbe.eu/Google Scholar
Yoon, W., Lee, D., & Song, J. (2015). Alliance network size, partner diversity, and knowledge creation in small biotech firms. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(5), 614626. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2015.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar