No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The impact of disaggregated formal institutional distance variables on entry mode decision: Evidence from Japan
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2023
Abstract
Grounded in the organizational legitimacy perspective, this study examines the influence of formal institutional distance (FID) on the entry mode choice of Japanese cross-border acquirers. By disaggregating the FID variable using the Worldwide Governance Indicators, we provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship between FID dimensions and acquisition behavior. We find that out of the six disaggregated FID measures, three dimensions significantly impact acquisition decisions. Specifically, FID related to ‘regulatory quality’ and ‘control of corruption’ negatively affects the likelihood of full acquisitions, while FID related to the ‘rule of law’ positively influences full acquisitions. Our findings challenge the use of aggregated measures and highlight the importance of considering institutional variations. Japanese acquirers demonstrate a preference for higher control in uncertain legal environments. This study contributes to the literature by offering insights into the specific FID dimensions that drive the choice between partial and full acquisitions for Japanese firms.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management
References
Agarwal, S., & Ramaswami, S. N. (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1–27.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agostino, M., Di Tommaso, M. R., Nifo, A., Rubini, L., & Trivieri, F. (2020). Institutional quality and firms’ productivity in European regions. Regional Studies, 54(9), 1275–1288.10.1080/00343404.2020.1712689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilera, R. V., & Grøgaard, B. (2019). The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahammad, M. F., Leone, V., Tarba, S. Y., Glaister, K. W., & Arslan, A. (2017). Equity ownership in cross‐border mergers and acquisitions by British firms: An analysis of real options and transaction cost factors. British Journal of Management, 28(2), 180–196.10.1111/1467-8551.12215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, K., & Bebenroth, R. (2019). Acquisition behavior of emerging versus developed market multinationals. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 10(1), 9–30.10.15388/omee.2019.10.00001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, K., & Bebenroth, R. (2022). Entry mode decisions in cross-border acquisitions: The role of strategic consistency and flexibility. Journal for Global Business Advancement, 15(2), 130–154.10.1504/JGBA.2022.127996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, K., Bebenroth, R., & Hennart, J. F. (2020). Formal institutional uncertainty and equity sought on foreign market entry: Does industry matter? Review of International Business and Strategy, 30(3), 421–440.10.1108/RIBS-01-2020-0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albassam, B. A. (2015). The influence of budget transparency on quality of governance. International Journal on Governmental Financial Management, 15(2), 89–109.Google Scholar
Amar, J., Arouri, M., Dufrénot, G., & Lecourt, C. (2023). Determinants of partial versus full cross-border acquisitions for Sovereign Wealth Funds. Review of World Economics. doi:10.1007/s10290-023-00504-6Google Scholar
Ando, N. (2012). The ownership structure of foreign subsidiaries and the effect of institutional distance: A case study of Japanese firms. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(2), 259–274.10.1080/13602381.2010.502315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ang, S. H., & Michailova, S. (2008). Institutional explanations of cross-border alliance modes: The case of emerging economies firms. Management International Review, 48(5), 551–576.Google Scholar
Aybar, B., & Ficici, A. (2009). Cross-border acquisitions and firm value: An analysis of emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1317–1338.10.1057/jibs.2009.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belderbos, R. (2003). Entry mode, organizational learning, and R&D in foreign affiliates: Evidence from Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3), 235–259.10.1002/smj.294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berden, K., Bergstrand, J. H., & Van Etten, E. (2014). Governance and globalisation. The World Economy, 37(3), 353–386.10.1111/twec.12135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480.10.1057/jibs.2010.28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beugelsdijk, S., Ambos, B., & Nell, P. C. (2018). Conceptualizing and measuring distance in international business research: Recurring questions and best practice guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 1113–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandl, K., Darendeli, I., & Mudambi, R. (2019). Foreign actors and intellectual property protection regulations in developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(5), 826–846.10.1057/s41267-018-0172-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, M., Hoshi, A., Inoue, K., & Suzuki, K. (2017). Uncertainty avoiding behavior and cross-border acquisitions in the Asia-Pacific region. Japan and the World Economy, 41, 99–112.10.1016/j.japwor.2017.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203–221.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Werner, S. (2003). Transaction cost‐enhanced entry mode choices and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1239–1248.10.1002/smj.362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J. F. (2007). Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33(3), 395–425.10.1177/0149206307300817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y. C., Kao, M. S., Kuo, A., & Chiu, C. F. (2012). How cultural distance influences entry mode choice: The contingent role of host country’s governance quality. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1160–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. M., & Makino, S. (2007). Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 621–638.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, M. C. H., & Kumar, V. (2010). The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity–performance relationship. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 93–103.10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chari, M. D., & Chang, K. (2009). Determinants of the share of equity sought in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1277–1297.10.1057/jibs.2008.103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. F. S. (2008). The motives for international acquisitions: Capability procurements, strategic considerations, and the role of ownership structures. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 454–471.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. F. S., & Hennart, J. F. (2004). A hostage theory of joint ventures: Why do Japanese investors choose partial over full acquisitions to enter the United States? Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1126–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chidlow, A., Ghauri, P. N., & Hadjikhani, A. (2019). Internationalization of service firms and their interactions with socio-political actors. Management International Review, 59(4), 499–514.10.1007/s11575-019-00388-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chikhouni, A., Edwards, G., & Farashahi, M. (2017). Psychic distance and ownership in acquisitions: Direction matters. Journal of International Management, 23(1), 32–42.10.1016/j.intman.2016.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, T., Huang, F., Liu, Y., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). The impact of non-timely 10-Q filings and audit firm size on audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journals, 33(5), 503–516.10.1108/MAJ-10-2017-1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contractor, F. J., Lahiri, S., Elango, B., & Kundu, S. K. (2014). Institutional, cultural and industry related determinants of ownership choices in emerging market FDI acquisitions. International Business Review, 23(5), 931–941.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Gaur, A., & Singh, D. (2019). Pro-market institutions and global strategy: The pendulum of pro-market reforms and reversals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4), 598–632.10.1057/s41267-019-00221-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 957–979.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, L., & Jiang, F. (2010). Behind ownership decision of Chinese outward FDI: Resources and institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4), 751–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuypers, I. R., Ertug, G., & Hennart, J. F. (2015). The effects of linguistic distance and lingua franca proficiency on the stake taken by acquirers in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(4), 429–442.10.1057/jibs.2014.71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, M., & Henry, D. (2016). Partial-control versus full-control acquisitions: Does target corporate governance matter? Evidence from eight East and Southeast Asian countries. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 40(Part B), 251–265.10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.12.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beule, F., Klein, M., & Verwaal, E. (2020). Institutional quality and inclusive strategies at the base of the pyramid. Journal of World Business, 55, 101066.10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 915–933.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199910)20:10<915::AID-SMJ51>3.0.CO;2-03.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. (2003). Political hazards, experience, and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980-1998. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1153–1164.10.1002/smj.355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirbag, M., Glaister, K. W., & Tatoglu, E. (2007). Institutional and transaction cost influences on MNEs’ ownership strategies of their affiliates: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 418–434.10.1016/j.jwb.2007.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K. W. (2010). Institutional and transaction cost influences on partnership structure of foreign affiliates. Management International Review, 50(6), 709–745.10.1007/s11575-010-0055-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikova, D., Panibratov, A., & Veselova, A. (2019). Investment motives, ownership advantages and institutional distance: An examination of Russian cross-border acquisitions. International Business Review, 28(4), 625–637.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doh, J. P., Rodriguez, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Collins, J., & Eden, L. (2003). Coping with corruption in foreign markets. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(3), 114–127.10.5465/ame.2003.10954775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, D., Cuypers, I. R., & Ertug, G. (2016). The effects of within-country linguistic and religious diversity on foreign acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 319–346.10.1057/jibs.2016.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H., Kim, Z. K., & Lee, C.-I. (2007). Restructuring the regional distribution of FDI: The case of Japanese and US FDI. Japan and the World Economy, 19(1), 26–47.10.1016/j.japwor.2005.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elango, B., Lahiri, S., & Kundu, S. K. (2013). How does firm experience and institutional distance impact ownership choice in high‐technology acquisitions? R&D Management, 43(5), 501–516.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. A., Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2017). Portable country governance and cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(2), 148–173.10.1057/s41267-016-0029-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrin, S., Baghdasaryan, D., & Meyer, K. E. (2009). The impact of institutional and human resource distance on international entry strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 46(7), 1171–1196.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00838.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentelsaz, L., Garrido, E., & González, M. (2020). Ownership in cross-border acquisitions and entry timing of the target firm. Journal of World Business, 55(2), 101046.10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, A. (2020). The effects of M&A on corporate performance in Japan: DID Analysis in the era of corporate governance reform. Japan and the World Economy, 55, 101013.10.1016/j.japwor.2020.101013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. (2007). Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1), 84–110.10.1177/0149206306295203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geleilate, J. M. G., Andrews, D. S., & Fainshmidt, S. (2020). Subsidiary autonomy and subsidiary performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of World Business, 55(4), 101049.Google Scholar
Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2003). Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 19–39.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godinez, J. R., & Liu, L. (2015). Corruption distance and FDI flows into Latin America. International Business Review, 24(1), 33–42.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gölgeci, I., Assadinia, S., Kuivalainen, O., & Larimo, J. (2019). Emerging-market firms’ dynamic capabilities and international performance: The moderating role of institutional development and distance. International Business Review, 28(6), 101593.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, D. R., Veliyath, R., & George, R. (2018). Influence of national culture on IPO activity. Journal of Business Research, 90, 226–246.10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Jo, G. S., & Kang, J. (2018). Is high-quality knowledge always beneficial? Knowledge overlap and innovation performance in technological mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2), 258–278.10.1017/jmo.2016.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, X., Brouthers, K. D., & Filatotchev, I. (2018). Market orientation and export performance: The moderation of channel and institutional distance. International Marketing Review, 35(2), 258–279.10.1108/IMR-09-2015-0194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for multinational investment. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16(2), 334–364.10.1093/jleo/16.2.334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennart, J. F. (1991). The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, 37(4), 483–497.10.1287/mnsc.37.4.483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ho, M. H. W., Ghauri, P. N., & Kafouros, M. (2019). Knowledge acquisition in international strategic alliances: The role of knowledge ambiguity. Management International Review, 59(3), 439–463.10.1007/s11575-019-00383-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, M. H. W., Ghauri, P. N., & Larimo, J. A. (2018). Institutional distance and knowledge acquisition in international buyer-supplier relationships: The moderating role of trust. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(2), 427–447.10.1007/s10490-017-9523-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Q., Jiang, F., Lie, E., & Yang, K. (2014). The role of investment banker directors in M&A. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(2), 269–286.10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 177–202.10.2307/259228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2019). Comparing capitalisms and taking institutional context seriously. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1), 4–19.10.1057/s41267-018-0206-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jean, D. A., & Lohmann, G. (2016). Revisiting the airline business model spectrum: The influence of post global financial crisis and airline mergers in the US (2011−2013). Research in Transportation Business & Management, 21, 76–83.10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, G. F., Holburn, G. L., & Beamish, P. W. (2014). The impact of vicarious experience on foreign location strategy. Journal of International Management, 20(3), 345–358.10.1016/j.intman.2013.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jory, S. R., & Ngo, T. N. (2015). The wealth effects of acquiring foreign divested assets. International Business Review, 24(2), 235–245.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2007). Governance Matters VI: Aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996–2006. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4280. Washington, D.C.,: World Bank.Google Scholar
Keig, D. L., Brouthers, L. E., & Marshall, V. B. (2019). The impact of formal and informal institutional distances on MNE corporate social performance. International Business Review, 28(5), 101584.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. Y., Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (2011). When firms are desperate to grow via acquisition: The effect of growth patterns and acquisition experience on acquisition premiums. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(1), 26–60.10.2189/asqu.2011.56.1.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konara, P., & Shirodkar, V. (2018). Regulatory institutional distance and MNCs’ subsidiary performance: Climbing up vs. climbing down the institutional ladder. Journal of International Management, 24(4), 333–347.10.1016/j.intman.2018.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostova, T., Beugelsdijk, S., Scott, W. R., Kunst, V. E., Chua, C. H., & van Essen, M. (2020). The construct of institutional distance through the lens of different institutional perspectives: Review, analysis, and recommendations. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 467–497.10.1057/s41267-019-00294-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006.10.5465/amr.2008.34422026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotler, P., Manrai, L. A., Lascu, D. N., & Manrai, A. K. (2019). Influence of country and company characteristics on international business decisions: A review, conceptual model, and propositions. International Business Review, 28(3), 482–498.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottaridi, C., Giakoulas, D., & Manolopoulos, D. (2019). Escapism FDI from developed economies: The role of regulatory context and corporate taxation. International Business Review, 28(1), 36–47.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, H. J., & Kim, E. (2014). Poverty reduction and good governance: Examining the rationale of the Millennium Development Goals. Development and Change, 45(2), 353–375.10.1111/dech.12084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, S., Elango, B., & Kundu, S. K. (2014). Cross-border acquisition in services: Comparing ownership choice of developed and emerging economy MNEs in India. Journal of World Business, 49(3), 409–420.10.1016/j.jwb.2013.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, J. H., Lin, W. C., & Chen, L. Y. (2017). The influence of CEO overconfidence on ownership choice in foreign market entry decisions. International Business Review, 26(4), 774–785.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, X., Musteen, M., & Datta, D. K. (2009). Strategic orientation and the choice of foreign market entry mode: An empirical examination. Management International Review, 49(3), 269–290.Google Scholar
Lindner, T., Puck, J., & Verbeke, A. (2020). Misconceptions about multicollinearity in international business research: Identification, consequences, and remedies. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 283–298.10.1057/s41267-019-00257-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makino, S., & Delios, A. (1996). Local knowledge transfer and performance: Implications for alliance formation in Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5), 905–927.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, S., & Gaur, A. S. (2014). Spatial geography and control in foreign acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2), 191–210.10.1057/jibs.2013.50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariotti, S., Piscitello, L., & Elia, S. (2014). Local externalities and ownership choices in foreign acquisitions by multinational enterprises. Economic Geography, 90(2), 187–211.10.1111/ecge.12039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengistu, A. A., & Adhikary, B. K. (2011). Does good governance matter for FDI inflows? Evidence from Asian economies. Asia Pacific Business Review, 17(3), 281–299.10.1080/13602381003755765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61–80.10.1002/smj.720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. (2005). Foreign investment strategies and sub‐national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 63–93.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00489.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morschett, D., Schramm-Klein, H., & Swoboda, B. (2010). Decades of research on market entry modes: What do we really know about external antecedents of entry mode choice? Journal of International Management, 16(1), 60–77.10.1016/j.intman.2009.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muralidharan, E., & Pathak, S. (2017). Informal institutions and international entrepreneurship. International Business Review, 26(2), 288–302.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Norton.10.1017/CBO9780511808678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y. R., Yul Lee, J., & Hong, S. (2011). Effects of international entry-order strategies on foreign subsidiary exit: The case of Korean chaebols. Management Decision, 49(9), 1471–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattnaik, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2014). Distance and divestment of Korean MNC affiliates: The moderating role of entry mode and experience. Asia Pacific Business Review, 20(1), 174–196.10.1080/13602381.2013.815454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, S., Paliwoda, S., & Slater, J. (2006). The erosion of stable shareholder practice in Japan (‘Anteikabunushi Kosaku’). International Business Review, 15(6), 618–640.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, G. Z., & Beamish, P. W. (2019). Subnational FDI legitimacy and foreign subsidiary survival. Journal of International Management, 25(3), 100662.10.1016/j.intman.2018.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poynter, T. A. (2013). Multinational enterprises and government intervention. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rabbiosi, L., & Santangelo, G. D. (2019). Host country corruption and the organization of HQ–subsidiary relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1), 111–124.10.1057/s41267-018-0169-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero-Martínez, A. M., García-Muiña, F. E., Chidlow, A., & Larimo, J. (2019). Formal and informal institutional differences between home and host country and Location Choice: Evidence from the Spanish Hotel Industry. Management International Review, 59(1), 41–65.10.1007/s11575-018-0369-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. A., & Gray, C. D. (1994). Ranking or rating? Some data and their implications for the measurement of evaluative response. British Journal of Psychology, 85(1), 79–92.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02509.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, R., & Wu, Z. (2012). Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 343–367.10.1057/jibs.2012.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartor, M. A., & Beamish, P. W. (2018). Host market government corruption and the equity-based foreign entry strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(3), 346–370.10.1057/s41267-017-0115-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartor, M. A., & Beamish, P. W. (2020). Private sector corruption, public sector corruption and the organizational structure of foreign subsidiaries. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 725–744.10.1007/s10551-019-04148-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwens, C., Eiche, J., & Kabst, R. (2011). The moderating impact of informal institutional distance and formal institutional risk on SME entry mode choice. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 330–351.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00970.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirodkar, V., & Konara, P. (2017). Institutional distance and foreign subsidiary performance in emerging markets: Moderating effects of ownership strategy and host-country experience. Management International Review, 57(2), 179–207.10.1007/s11575-016-0301-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirodkar, V., Konara, P., & McGuire, S. (2017). Home‐institutional imprinting and lobbying expenditure of foreign firms: Moderating effects of experience and technological intensity. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 589–608.10.1111/1467-8551.12252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slangen, A. H., & Van Tulder, R. J. (2009). Cultural distance, political risk, or governance quality? Towards a more accurate conceptualization and measurement of external uncertainty in foreign entry mode research. International Business Review, 18(3), 276–291.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.02.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slesman, L., Abubakar, Y. A., & Mitra, J. (2021). Foreign direct investment and entrepreneurship: Does the role of institutions matter? International Business Review, 30(4), 101774.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taiwan, G. D. P. (2018). In trading economics. Retrieved November 2 , 2018, from https://tradingeconomics.com/taiwan/gdp.Google Scholar
Tang, R. W. (2019). FDI expansion speed of state-owned enterprises and the moderating role of market capitalism: Evidence from China. International Business Review, 28(6), 101596.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanganelli, D., Schaan, J. L., & Cook, S. (2014). Japanese subsidiaries in the European Union: Entry modes and performance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 2(1), 920270.10.1080/23322039.2014.920270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashman, P., Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153–171.10.1057/s41267-018-0171-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trąpczyński, P., Halaszovich, T. F., & Piaskowska, D. (2020). The role of perceived institutional distance in foreign ownership level decisions of new MNEs. Journal of Business Research, 108, 435–449.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, A., Schmitt, J., Koch, B., & Nell, P. C. (2019). Leaving home: An institutional perspective on intermediary HQ relocations. Journal of World Business, 54(4), 273–284.10.1016/j.jwb.2018.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hoorn, A., & Maseland, R. (2016). How institutions matter for international business: Institutional distance effects vs institutional profile effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 374–381.10.1057/jibs.2016.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasudeva, G., Nachum, L., & Say, G. D. (2018). A signaling theory of institutional activism: How Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund investments affect firms’ foreign acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1583–1611.10.5465/amj.2015.1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57(2), 307–333.10.2307/1912557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., & Schaan, J. L. (2008). How much distance do we need? Revisiting the ‘national cultural distance paradox’. Management International Review, 48(3), 263–278.10.1007/s11575-008-0015-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waqar, W. T. (2020). Board size and acquisition outcome: The moderating role of home country formal institutional development. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(4), 529–541.10.1002/mde.3118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. O. III, Fainshmidt, S., & Rajwani, T. (2018). Antecedents and outcomes of political tie intensity: Institutional and strategic fit perspectives. Journal of International Management, 24(1), 1–15.10.1016/j.intman.2017.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C., Martinez, C., Gastelaars, E., Galesloot, L., & van de Kerke, D. (2011). Dutch MNE foreign expansion into developed and developing economies. Management International, 16(1), 31–44.10.7202/1006916arCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooster, R. B., Blanco, L., & Sawyer, W. C. (2016). Equity commitment under uncertainty: A hierarchical model of real option entry mode choices. International Business Review, 25(1), 382–394.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X., Liu, X., & Huang, Q. (2012). Impact of the institutional environment on the choice of entry mode: Evidence from Chinese enterprises. China: An International Journal, 10(1), 28–50.10.1353/chn.2012.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D., Pan, Y., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies. Management International Review, 44(3), 285–307.Google Scholar
Yiu, D., & Makino, S. (2002). The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13(6), 667–683.10.1287/orsc.13.6.667.494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, H., Peillex, J., & Buckley, P. J. (2021). Friends or foes? Bilateral relationships and ownership choice in cross‐border acquisitions by emerging market firms. British Journal of Management, 32(3), 852–871.10.1111/1467-8551.12442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.10.2307/256683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. S., & Nachum, L. (2012). Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 18–27.10.1057/jibs.2011.43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M. M., & Beamish, P. W. (2019). An institutional response model to economic liberalization: Japanese MNEs’ ownership choices in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(1), 33–59.10.1007/s10490-017-9549-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubair, S. S., & Khan, M. (2014). Good governance: Pakistan’s economic growth and Worldwide Governance Indicators. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 8(1), 274–287.Google Scholar