Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T17:37:08.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors influencing governance choice and human resource management within services franchising networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Scott Weaven  and
Carmel Herington
Scott Weaven
Affiliation:
Griffith Business School, Department of Marketing, Griffith University, – Gold Coast campus, Southport QLD, Australia
Carmel Herington
Affiliation:
Griffith Business School, Department of Marketing, Griffith University, – Gold Coast campus, Southport QLD, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research provides a better understanding of the factors driving the choice of governance structures and human resource management (HRM) practices within services franchising arrangements. A qualitative multiple case study approach was favoured so as to obtain a clearer picture of the main issues and parameters. Nineteen franchisors using predominantly pure franchising, predominantly pure company-owned, plural, and predominantly multiple unit growth strategies were interviewed. Major contrasts have been identified, suggesting that system size, industry maturity and the nature of market demand impacts upon the choice of system governance structure. Generally, less mature and smaller networks rely upon predominantly single unit franchising strategies and less sophisticated HRM practices to foster local market innovation, build brand value and support rapid unit growth, while predominantly company owned strategies are favoured in environments of low competition and minimal demand uncertainty. In comparison, more mature systems use hybridised franchising forms and sophisticated HRM strategies to accommodate the competing demands of local market innovation, systemwide adaptation and system uniformity.

Keywords

franchisingpluralmultiple unitHRMmutual learning

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 126 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achrol, RS (1996) The franchise as a network organisation. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Society of Franchising Conference, Partners for Progress…a World of Opportunities, Dugan, A (Ed.), Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Alchian, AA and Demsetz, H (1972) Production, information costs, and economics organisation, American Economic Review, 62: 777–795.Google Scholar
Bergen, M, Dutta, S and Walker, O (1992) Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories, Journal of Marketing, 56(1):1–24.Google Scholar
Birley, G and Moreland, N (1998) A Practical Guide to Academic Research, London, Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Bradach, JL (1998) Franchise Organisations, Boston, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bradach, JL (1997) Using the plural form in the management of restaurant chains, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 276–303.Google Scholar
Bradach, J L (1995) Chains within chains: The role of multi-unit franchisees, Journal of Marketing Channels, 4(1/2): 65–81.Google Scholar
Brickley, J, Dark, F & Weisbach, M (1991) An agency perspective on franchising, Financial Management, 20(1): 27–35.Google Scholar
Carson, D, Gilmore, D, Perry, C and Gronhaug, K (2001) Qualitative Marketing Research, London, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Castrogiovanni, G and Justis, RT (1998) Franchising configurations and transitions, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(2): 170–190.Google Scholar
Caves, R and Murphy, WII (1976) Franchising: firms, markets and tangible assets, Southern Economic Journal, 42(4): 572–586.Google Scholar
Chow, L and Frazer, L (2003) Servicing customers directly: Mobile franchising arrangements in Australia’, European Journal of Marketing 37(3/4): 594–613.Google Scholar
Cliquet, G (2000) Plural form in store networks: A model for store network evolution, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 10(4): 369–87.Google Scholar
Cliquet, G and Croizean, J (2002) Towards plural forms, franchising/company-owned systems in the French cosmetics retail industry. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 30(5): 238–250.Google Scholar
Combs, JG and Castrogiovanni, G (1994) Franchisor strategy: A proposed model and empirical test of franchise vs. company ownership, Journal of Small Business Management, 32(2): 37–48.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, R and Nygaard, A (1994) A preliminary investigation of franchised oil distribution in Norway, Journal of Retailing, 70(2): 179–191.Google Scholar
Dant, RP (1995) Motivation for franchising: Rhetoric vs. reality, International Small Business Journal, 14(1):10–32.Google Scholar
Dant, RP and Gundlach, GT (1998) The challenge of autonomy and dependence in franchised channels of distribution, Journal of Business Venturing, 14(1): 35–67.Google Scholar
Dant, RP and Nasr, NI (1998) ‘Control Techniques and Upward Flow of Information in Franchising in Distant Markets: Conceptualization and Preliminary Evidence’, Journal of Business Venturing 13(1): 3–28.Google Scholar
Deshpande, R (1983) “Paradigms lost”: On theory and method in research marketing, Journal of Marketing, 47 (Fall):101–110.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, KM (1989) Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.Google Scholar
Elango, B and Fried, V (1997) Franchising research: A literature review and synthesis, Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3): 68–81.Google Scholar
Feagin, J, Orum, A and Sjoberg, G (Eds) (1991) A case for case study, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill NC.Google Scholar
Frazer, L (2000) Assessing franchising sector maturity: Australian evidence, Australasian Marketing Journal, 8(2): 33–46.Google Scholar
Frazer, L and Weaven, S (2004) Franchising Australia 04. Brisbane, Griffith University: 1–71.Google Scholar
Frazer, L, Weaven, S and Wright, S (2006) Franchising Australia06, Griffith University/Franchise Council of Australia: Brisbane: 1–71.Google Scholar
Glaser, B and Strauss, A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
Gibb, S (2001) The state of human resource management: evidence from employees' views of HRM systems and staff, Employee Relations, 23(4/5): 318–336.Google Scholar
Goulding, C (2002) Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide For Management, Business and Market Researchers, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Hunt, SD (1973) The trends toward company operated units in franchise chains, Journal of Retailing, 49(2): 2–12.Google Scholar
Jain, S (1989) Standardisation of international marketing strategy: Some research hypotheses, Journal of Marketing, 53: 70–79.Google Scholar
Jambulingam, T and Nevin, JR (1999) Influence on franchisee selection criteria on outcomes desired by the franchisor, Journal of Business Venturing, 14: 363–395.Google Scholar
Johnson, BR (1997) Examining the validity structure of qualitative research, Education, 118(2): 282–292.Google Scholar
Kalnins, A and Lafontaine, F (1999) Incentive and strategic motives for vertical separation: Evidence from location patterns in the Texan fast food industry, Working paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, PJ (1996) The state of research in franchising. Franchising Research: An International Journal, 1(1): 4–7.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, PJ (1992) The impact of managerial performance decay on franchisors' store allocation strategies, Journal of Marketing Channels, 1(4): 51–80.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, PJ and Dant, RP (1998) Franchising and the domain of entrepreneurship research, Journal of Business Venturing, 14(1): 5–16.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, PJ and Dant, RP (1996) Multi-unit franchising: growth and management issues, Journal of Business Venturing, 11(5): 343–358.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, PJ and Ergolu, S (1998) Standardisation and adaptation in business format franchising, Journal of Business Venturing, 14(1): 69–85.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, PJ and Kim, SH (1995) Master franchising and system growth rates. In Franchising: Contemporary Issues and Research, (Eds) Kaufmann, PJ and Dant, RP, Harword Press, New York: 49–64.Google Scholar
Koch, MJ and McGrath, RG (1996) Improving Labor Productivity: Human resource management policies do matter, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 335–354.Google Scholar
Kvale, S (1989) Issues of Validity in Qualitative Research, Krieger Malabar FL.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, F (1999) Franchising: myth, reality and what it may all mean to you, Financial Times, Mastering Strategy Series, 11 22 1999.Google Scholar
Litz, RA and Stewart, AC (2000) Research Note: Trade name franchise membership as a human resource management strategy: Does buying group training deliver ‘true value’ for small retailers?’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(1): 125–136.Google Scholar
Mathewson, GF and Winter, RA (1985) The economics of franchise contracts, Journal of Law and Economics. 28 (10): 503–526.Google Scholar
McCosker, C (1994) The growth and ongoing development of franchising as a business method: the Australian experience. Proceedings of the Culture of Business: The Russian and World Experience International Conference. 11. Moscow: 1–27.Google Scholar
Merriam, SB (1985) The case in educational research: A review of selected literature, Journal of Educational Thought 19(3):4–17.Google Scholar
Miles, MB and Huberman, AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: a Sourcebook for New Methods, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H (1979) Structuring of Organizations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.Google Scholar
Norton, S (1988) An empirical look at franchising as an organisational form, Journal of Business, 61(2): 197–217.Google Scholar
Oxenfeldt, AR and Kelly, AO (1968) Will successful franchise systems ultimately become wholly owned chains? Journal of Retailing, 44(4): 69–83.Google Scholar
Patton, M (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.Google Scholar
Perry, C, Riege, A and Brown, L (1999) Realism's role among scientific paradigms in marketing research, Irish Marketing Review, 12(2).Google Scholar
Robicheaux, RA, Dant, R and Kaufmann, PJ (1994) Multiple unit franchising in the fast food industry in the united states: incidence and operating characteristics. Proceedings of the Society of Franchising, in Understanding and Accepting Different Perspectives…Empowering Relationships in 1994 and Beyond, Swerdlow, S (Ed.), Las Vegas, Nevada, 13–14th02.Google Scholar
Rubin, P (1978) The theory of the firm and the structure of the franchise contract, Journal of Law and Economics, 21(1): 223–233.Google Scholar
Sen, KC (2001) Information asymmetry and the franchise decision, Journal of Marketing Channels, 8(1/2): 91–109.Google Scholar
Shane, SA (1996) Hybrid organisational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival: A study of new franchisors, Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 216–228.Google Scholar
Shane, SA and Foo, M (1998) New firm survival: institutional explanations for new franchisor mortality, Working Paper. Cambridge, Sloan School of Management, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sorenson, JB (1999) The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance, Working paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Sorenson, O and Sørensen, J (2001) Finding the right mix: franchising, organizational learning and chain performance, Strategic Management Journal, 22 (Summer): 713–724.Google Scholar
Stake, RE (1990) Situational context as influence on evaluation design and use, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 16: 231–246.Google Scholar
Stanworth, J (1995) The franchise relationship: Entrepreneurship or dependence, Journal of Marketing Channels, 4(1/2): 161–176.Google Scholar
Terry, A (1993) The distribution of goods and services through business format franchising {part 1}, Current Commercial Law, 1(1) 03: 18–23.Google Scholar
Thomas, WL, Ohara, MJ and Musgrave, FW (1990) The effects of ownership and investment on the performance of franchise systems, American Economist, 34(1): 54–61.Google Scholar
Wattel, H (1968) Are franchisors realistic and successful in their selection of franchisees? Journal of Retailing, 44(4) (Winter): 54–68.Google Scholar
Weaven, S and Frazer, L (2003) Predicting multiple unit franchising: a franchisor and franchisee perspective, Journal of Marketing Channels, 10(3): 53–82.Google Scholar
Westhead, P and Storey, DJ (1999) Training provision and the development of small and medium-sized enterprise: A critical review, Scottish Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 5(1): 35–41.Google Scholar
Wolcott, HE (1994) Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis and Interpretations, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
Yin, RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
Zarco, R and Einhorn, RM (1999) The Franchise Handbook, viewed 1st September04, <http://www.zarcolaw.com/CM/Articles/articles57.asp>..>Google Scholar
Zerbe, W, Dobni, D and Harel, G (1998) ‘Promoting employee service behaviour: The role of perceptions of human resource management practices and service culture’, Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 15(2): 165–179.Google Scholar