Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T04:10:01.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shift in Harmonic Serialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

FREDERICK GIETZ ,
PETER JURGEC  and
MAIDA PERCIVAL
FREDERICK GIETZ
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, 100 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada frederick.gietz@utoronto.ca
PETER JURGEC
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, 100 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada peter.jurgec@utoronto.ca
MAIDA PERCIVAL
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, 100 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada maida.percival@mail.utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Harmonic Serialism is a serial version of Optimality Theory in which Gen is restricted to one operation at a time. What constitutes one operation has been a key question in the literature. This paper asks whether shift, in which a feature moves/flops from one segment to another, should be considered an operation. We review three pieces of evidence that suggest so. We show that only the one-step shift analysis can capture the tonal patterns in Kibondei and the segmental patterns in Halkomelem; grammars that rely on spreading or floating features cannot. We complement these findings with a factorial typology in which the one-step shifting grammars predict several attested patterns that the grammars without one-step shift cannot. We conclude that shift must be a single operation in Harmonic Serialism.

Keywords

Autosegmental Phonologyfactorial typologyHalkomelem (Hul’q’umi’num’)KibondeiOptimality Theorytone
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 23 - 59
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Michael Becker, Elizabeth Cowper, B. Elan Dresher, Christopher Green, Larry Hyman, Sharon Inkelas, Keren Rice, the audiences at the 3rd Annual Meeting on Phonology in Vancouver and the 46th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society in Montreal, six anonymous reviewers and two editors for their comments and suggestions that helped improve this paper. Thanks also to Ruby Peter and Delores Louie for reviewing some of the Hul’q’umi’num’ data.

References

Adler, Jeffrey & Zymet, Jesse. 2021. Irreducible parallelism in phonology: Evidence for lookahead in Mohawk, Maragoli, Sino-Japanese, and Lithuanian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39.2, 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderete, John D. 1999. Morphologically governed accent in Optimality Theory. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas. 2002. Kinande vowel harmony: Domains, grounded conditions and one-sided alignment. Phonology 19.2, 139–188.Google Scholar
Baković, Eric. 2000. Harmony, dominance, and control. Dissertation, Rutgers University. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 360, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael & Jurgec, Peter. 2017. Interactions of tone and ATR in Slovenian. In Kehrein, Wolfgang, Köhnlein, Björn, Boersma, Paul & van Oostendorp, Marc (eds.), Segmental structure and tone, 11–26. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Michael & Jurgec, Peter. 2020. Positional faithfulness drives laxness alternations in Slovenian. Phonology 37.3, 335–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. 1997. Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14.1, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. 1998. Positional faithfulness. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 234, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan & Henderson, Robert. 2013. Accent in Uspanteko. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31.3, 589–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benua, Laura. 1997. Transderivational Identity: Phonological relations between words. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bessell, Nicola J. 1998. Local and non-local consonant-vowel interaction in Interior Salish. Phonology 15.1, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianco, Violet. 1998. Stress assignment in Halkomelem-Cowichan roots. Proceedings of the International Conference on Salish and Neighbo(u)ring Languages 33, 60–76.Google Scholar
Bickmore, Lee S. 1995. Tone and stress in lamba. Phonology 12.3, 307–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaho, Sylvia. 2008. The syntax of phonology: A radically substance-free approach. Dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Blaho, Sylvia & Rice, Curt. 2014. Overgeneralization and falsifiability in phonological theory. In Durand, Jacques, Kristoffersen, Gjert & Laks, Bernard (eds.), La phonologie de français: Normes, périphéries, modélisation, 101–120. Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris Ouest.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, Lev A. 2006. Constraints on phonological interactions. Dissertation, Stanford University. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 877, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Breteler, Jeroen. 2017a. Deriving bounded tone with layered feet in Harmonic Serialism: The case of Saghala. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2.1, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breteler, Jeroen. 2017b. A foot-based typology of tonal reassociation: Perspectives from synchrony and learnability. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cassimjee, Farida & Kisseberth, Charles. 1992. The tonology of depressor consonants: Evidence from Mijikenda and Nguni. Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 18, 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassimjee, Farida & Kisseberth, Charles. 1998. Optimal Domains Theory and Bantu tonology: A case study from Isixhosa and Shingazidja. In Hyman, Larry & Kisseberth, Charles (eds.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu tone, 33–132. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 176, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1984. Principles of tone assignment in Kikuyu. In Clements, George N. & Goldsmith, John A. (eds.), Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone, 281–339. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. 1991. Vowel height assimilation in Bantu languages. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 5, 37–74.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. & Ford, Kevin C.. 1979. Kikuyu tone shift and its synchronic consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 10.2, 179–210.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine. 2001. Vowel reduction in Optimality Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Lacy, Paul. 2006. Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Simon Scurr. 2007. Aspects of tone and voice in Phuthi. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J. 1990. Local and metrical tone shift in Nguni. Studies in African Linguistics 21.3, 261–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Raymond A., Edmondson, Jerold A. & Cruz, Fausto Sandoval. 2016. Chicahuaxtla Triqui. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 46.3, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukazawa, Haruka. 1999. Theoretical implications of OCP effects on features in Optimality Theory. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 307, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. [1996] 1999. The articulatory basis of locality in phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Hinkson, Mercedes Q.. 2003. An applicative use of the Halkomelem lexical suffix FACE. Proceedings of the International Conference on Salish and neighbo(u)ring Languages 38, 65–90.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Werle, Adam. 2014. Halkomelem clitic types. Morphology 24.3, 245–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hagberg, Lawrence Raymond. 2006. An autosegmental theory of stress. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Hall, Erin, Jurgec, Peter & Kawahara, Shigeto. 2018. Opaque allomorph selection in Japanese and Harmonic Serialism: A reply to Kurisu (2012). Linguistic Inquiry 49.3, 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hukari, Thomas E. & Peter, Ruby. 1995. The Cowichan dictionary of the Hul’qumi’num’ dialect of the Coast Salish people. Duncan, Canada: Cowichan Tribes.Google Scholar
Hyde, Brett. 2007. Non-finality and weight-sensitivity. Phonology 24.2, 287–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Brett. 2012a. Alignment constraints. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30.3, 789–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Brett. 2012b. The odd-parity input problem in metrical stress theory. Phonology 29.3, 383–431.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 1988. Underspecification and vowel height transfer in Esimbi. Phonology 5.2, 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 2011. Tone: is it different? In Riggle, Jason & Alan, C. L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 197–239. Chichester: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin. 1998. Markedness and word structure: OCP effects in Japanese. Ms. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 255, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin. 1999. Realignment. In Kager, René, van der Hulst, Harry & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.), The prosody–morphology interface, 188–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin. 2020. Match Theory and prosodic wellformedness constraints. In Zhang, Hongming & Qian, Youyong (eds.), Prosodic studies: Challenges and prospects, 252–274. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, Mester, Armin & Padgett, Jaye. 1995. Licensing and underspecification in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26.4, 571–631.Google Scholar
Jesney, Karen. 2011. Positional faithfulness, non-locality, and the Harmonic Serialism solution. In Lima, Susi, Mullin, Kevin & Smith, Brian (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 39), 429–440. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Jurgec, Peter. 2010. Disjunctive lexical stratification. Linguistic Inquiry 41.1, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurgec, Peter. 2011. Feature spreading 2.0: A unified theory of assimilation. Dissertation, University of Tromsø. Available on LingBuzz, http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/001281.Google Scholar
Kanerva, Jonni. 1990. Focus and phrasing in Chichewa phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1996. Base identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity. In Durand, Jacques & Laks, Bernard (eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, 366–396. Salford: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1997. Quality-sensitive stress. Rivista di Linguistica 9.1, 157–187.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Kisseberth, Charles. 1990. Chizigula tonology: The word and beyond. In Inkelas, Sharon & Zec, Draga (eds.), The phonology-syntax connection, 163–194. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kimper, Wendell. 2011a. Competing triggers: Transparency and opacity in vowel harmony. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kimper, Wendell. 2011b. Locality and globality in phonological variation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29.2, 423–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimper, Wendell. 2012. Harmony is myopic. Linguistic Inquiry 43.2, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles. 1984. Digo tonology. In Clements, George N. and Goldsmith, John A. (eds.), Autosegmental Studies in Bantu Tone, 105–182. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles. 1994. On domains. In Cole, Jennifer & Kisseberth, Charles (eds.), Perspectives in phonology, 133–166. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles & Odden, David. 2003. Tone. In Nurse, Derek & Philippson, Gérard (eds.), The Bantu languages, 59–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kula, Nancy C. & Bickmore, Lee S.. 2015. Phrasal phonology in Copperbelt Bemba. Phonology 32.1, 147–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landaburu, Jon. 1979. La langue des Andoke, Amazonie colombienne. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Landaburu, Jon. 2000. La lengua Andoque. In María Stella González de Pérez & María Luisa Rodrguez de Montes (eds.), Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: Una visión descriptiva, 275–288. Santa Fe, Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Leben, William. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Lee, Minkyung & Lee, Yongsung. 2002. Abstract tone in Kibondei verbal morphology: An OT account. Western Conference on Linguistics 2000 Proceedings (WECOL 2000) 12, 342–350.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark. 1975. The intonational system of English. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8.2, 249–336.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda. 1998. Evidence for MaxFeature constraints from Japanese. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 41–62. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 247, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Longachre, Robert E. 1959. Trique tonbe morphemics. Anthropological Linguistics 1.4, 5–42.Google Scholar
Mahanta, Shakuntala. 2008. Directionality and locality in vowel harmony: With special reference to vowel harmony in Assamese. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap (LOT).Google Scholar
Mahanta, Shakuntala. 2012. Locality in exceptions and derived environments in vowel harmony. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30.4, 1109–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, Violeta & Kager, René. 2015. The binary-to-ternary rhythmic continuum in stress typology: Layered feet and non-intervention constraints. Phonology 32.3, 459–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17.2, 207–264.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1997. Process–specific constraints in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 28.2, 231–251.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2003. OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20.1, 75–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2006. Restraint of analysis. In Baković, Eric, Ito, Junko & McCarthy, John J. (eds.), Wondering at the natural fecundity of things: Essays in honor of Alan Prince. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2007. Slouching towards optimality: Coda reduction in OT-CC. Phonological Studies (Journal of the Phonological Society of Japan) 7, 89–104.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2008a. The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology 25.2, 271–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2008b. The serial interaction of stress and syncope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26.3, 499–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2010a. Harmonic Serialism supplement to Doing Optimality Theory. Ms. University of Massachussets Amherst. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 1099, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2010b. An introduction to Harmonic Serialism. Language and Linguistics Compass 10.4, 1010–1018.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2010c. Studying Gen. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 13.2, 3–12.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2011. Autosegmental spreading in Optimality Theory. In Goldsmith, John A., Hume, Elizabeth & Wetzels, Leo (eds.), Tones and features, Clements memorial volume, 195–222. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2016. The theory and practice of Harmonic Serialism. In McCarthy, John J. & Pater, Joe (eds.), Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism, 47–87. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., Kimper, Wendell & Mullin, Kevin. 2012a. Reduplication in Harmonic Serialism. Morphology 22.2, 173–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J., Mullin, Kevin & Smith, Brian W.. 2012b. Implications of Harmonic Serialism for lexical tone association. In Botma, Bert & Noske, Roland (eds.), Phonological explorations, 265–297. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1993. Generalized Alignment. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook in morphology 1993, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, Jill N., Walsh, Laura & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 60, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Pruitt, Kathryn. 2013. Sources of prosodic structure. In Broekhuis, Hans & Vogel, Ralf (eds.), Linguistic derivations and filtering: Minimalism and Optimality Theory, 110–135. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Morén, Bruce. [1999] 2001. Distinctiveness, coercion and sonority: A unified theory of weight. New York: Routledge. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 349, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott. 1997. OCP effects in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15.4, 847–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Scott. 1998. Surface underspecification of tone in Chichewa. Phonology 15.3, 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Scott. 1999. Tone association and F0 timing in Chichewa. Studies in African Linguistics 28.2, 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2010. Locality in vowel harmony. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ní Chiosáin, Máire & Padgett, Jaye. 2001. Markedness, segment realization, and locality of spreading. In Lombardi, Linda (ed.), Segmental phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and representations, 118–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odden, David. 1986. On the role of the Obligatory Contour Principle in phonological theory. Language 62.2, 353–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odden, David. 1988. Anti antigemination and the OCP. Linguistic Inquiry 19.3, 451–476.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2000. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17.2, 237–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2007. The locus of exceptionality: Morpheme–specific phonology as constraint indexation. In Bateman, Leah, O’Keefe, Michael, Reilly, Ehren & Werle, Adam (eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 32: Papers in Optimality Theory III, 259–296. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 866, http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Poletto, Robert E. 1998. Topics in Runyankore phonology. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan. 1983. Relating to grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14.1, 19–100.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. [1993] 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 537, http://roa.rutgers.edu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, Kathryn. 2010. Serialism and locality in constraint-based metrical parsing. Phonology 27.3, 481–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, Kathryn. 2012. Stress in Harmonic Serialism. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1986. Tone in lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ruth. 1992. A non-metrical theory of Sukuma tone. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 41, 183–235.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In Goldsmith, John A., Riggle, Jason & Alan, C. L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn, 435–484. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snider, Keith L. 1999. The geometry of features of tone. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Staubs, Robert, Becker, Michael, Potts, Christopher, Pratt, Patrick, McCarthy, John J. & Pater, Joe. 2010. OT-Help 2.0: Software package, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2001. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: A perceptual account. In Hume, Elizabeth V. & Johnson, Keith (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology, 219–250. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2008. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In Hanson, Kristin & Inkelas, Sharon (eds.), The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, 151–180. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, John M. 1993. Dschang and Ebrie as Akan-type total downstep languages. In van der Hulst, Harry & Snider, Keith L. (eds.), The phonology of tone: The representation of tonal register, 185–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Suttles, Wayne. 2004. Musqueam reference grammar. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Tadejeu, Maurice. 1974. Floating tones, shifting rules, and downstep in Dschang-Bamileke. Studies in African Linguistics (suppl.) 5, 283–290.Google Scholar
Toporišič, Jože. [1976] 2000. Slovenska slovnica. Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Torres-Tamarit, Francesc & Jurgec, Peter. 2015. Lapsed derivations: Ternary stress in Harmonic Serialism. Linguistic Inquiry 46.2, 376–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oostendorp, Marc. 2005. Expressing inflection tonally. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Rachel. 2001. Round licensing, harmony, and bisyllabic triggers in Altaic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19.4, 827–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Rachel. 2011. Vowel patterns in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Rachel. 2014. Nonlocal trigger-target relations. Linguistic Inquiry 45.3, 501–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Colin. 2000. Targeted constraints: An approach to contextual neutralization in Optimality Theory. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1988. The Obligatory Contour Principle and phonological rules: A loss of identity. Linguistic Inquiry 19.1, 65–100.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zec, Draga. 1999. Footed tones and tonal feet: Rhythmic consistency in a pitch-accent language. Phonology 16.2, 225–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerbian, Sabiane. 2006. High tone spread in the Sotho verb. In Mugane, John, Hutchison, John P. & Worman, Dee A. (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 35th annual conference of African linguistics: African languages and linguistics in broad perspectives, 147–157. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gietz et al. supplementary material

Gietz et al. supplementary material

Download Gietz et al. supplementary material(File)
File 67 KB