We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Agud, A. (1980). Historia y teoria de los casos. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1977). On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In Li, C. (ed.) Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 317–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language67. 547–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. L. (1982). Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. Work Papers of Summer Institute of Linguistics – Australian Aborigines Branch. A6. 217–315.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1976). Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Li, C. (ed.) Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. 303–334.Google Scholar
Maling, J. & Zaenen, A. (eds.) (1990). Syntax and semantics 24: Modern Icelandic syntax. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. (1888). A first Greek course. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Smyth, H. W. (1956). Greek grammar. (Revised by Gordon Messing.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar