Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T08:00:34.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accounting for non-constituents in hybrid quotations: Why unquotation is not the answer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2022

PHILIPPE DE BRABANTER Open the ORCID record for PHILIPPE DE BRABANTER [Opens in a new window]
PHILIPPE DE BRABANTER*
Affiliation:
LaDisco centre for linguistic research, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP 175, Avenue F. Roosevelt, 50, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium, Philippe.De.Brabanter@ulb.be.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper addresses a serious challenge to some recent semantic accounts of quotation: the existence of ‘non-constituent hybrid quotations’, as in Vera said she was ‘very happy and incredibly relieved’ by the supreme court’s decision. These pose a threat to theories that have to make the assumption that hybrid quotations must be co-extensive with syntactic constituents. Responses to the challenge have been proposed, first a quote-breaking procedure, and subsequently unquotation. I argue that these responses fall short of providing empirically satisfactory accounts of the phenomena. Other theories of quotation are not under threat of non-constituent hybrid quotations. I single out a particular family of theories, depiction theories, which have the added advantage of doing justice to the core mechanisms at the heart of quoting.

Keywords

depictionhybrid quotationmixed quotationnon-constituentsyntactic constituentunquotation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 1 - 22
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the F.R.S.-FNRS research project T.0184.16, 2016–2021. I also wish to thank the three Journal of Linguistics referees for their helpful suggestions and challenges.

References

Abbott, Barbara. 2005. Some notes on quotation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbaji, Yitzhak. 2004. A demonstrative analysis of ‘open quotation’. Mind & Language 19, 534–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbaji, Yitzhak. 2005. Who needs semantics of quotation marks? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brendel, Elke, Meibauer, Jörg & Steinbach, Markus (eds.). 2011. Understanding quotation. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bringhurst, Robert. 2004. The elements of typographic style, version 3.0. Vancouver: Hartley & Marks.Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie. 1997. Varieties of quotation. Mind 106, 429–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie. 2005. Varieties of quotation revisited. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chicago Manual of Style . 2010. The Chicago manual of style, 16th edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2016. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123, 324–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, Herbert H. & Gerrig, Richard J.. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66, 764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, Samuel. 2005. Two accounts of indexicals in mixed quotation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1979. Quotation. Theory and Decision 11, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Brabanter, Philippe. 2010. The semantics and pragmatics of hybrid quotations. Language and Linguistics Compass 4, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Brabanter, Philippe. 2013. François Recanati’s radical pragmatic theory of quotation. Teorema 32.2, 109–128.Google Scholar
De Brabanter, Philippe. 2017. Why quotation is not a semantic phenomenon, and why it calls for a pragmatic theory. In Depraetere, Ilse and Salkie, Raphael (eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line, 227–254. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Brabanter, Philippe. 2020. The interpretation of indexicals in hybrid quotation: A pragmatic account. Anglophonia 28. doi:10.4000/anglophonia.2646.Google Scholar
De Brabanter, Philippe. 2022. Quotation does not need marks of quotation. Ms. Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2005. Double-duty quotation: The deferred ostension account. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2011. Double-duty quotation, conventional implicatures and what is said. In Brendel et al. (eds.), 107–138.Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart & Maier, Emar. 2005. Quotation in context. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Torrente, Mario. 2005. Remarks on impure quotation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17, 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Torrente, Mario. 2017. Semantics vs. pragmatics in impure quotation. In Saka & Johnson (eds.), 135–167.Google Scholar
Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2017. Quotation in dialogue. In Saka & Johnson (eds.), 195–255.Google Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert. 1963. From Galileo to Newton 1630–1720. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, David. 1996. Therapy. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Maier, Emar. 2007. Mixed quotation: Between use and mention. Proceedings of the 4th International Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics workshop (LENLS 2007). Miyazaki, Japan.Google Scholar
Maier, Emar. 2008. Breaking quotations. In Satoh, Ken, Inokuchi, Akihiro, Nagao, Katashi & Kawamura, Takahiro (eds.), New frontiers in artificial intelligence, 187–200. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Emar. 2014. Mixed quotation: The grammar of apparently transparent opacity. Semantics & Pragmatics 7, art. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Emar. 2015. Quotation and unquotation in free indirect discourse. Mind & Language 30, 345–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Emar. 2017. The pragmatics of attraction: Explaining unquotation in direct and free indirect discourse. In Saka & Johnson (eds.), 259–280.Google Scholar
McCullagh, Mark. 2007. Understanding mixed quotation. Mind 116, 927–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullagh, Mark. 2017. Scare-quoting and incorporation. In Saka & Johnson (eds.), 3–34.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. 1937. The physical treatises of Pascal: The equilibrium of the fluids and the weight of the mass of the air, translated by Isidore Henry Bowles Spiers & Alexander Guy Holborn Spiers. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Charles Sanders, Peirce 1998. The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings, volume 2 Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Perrin, Robert. 2010. Pocket guide to APA style, 4th edn. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2007. The dimensions of quotation. In Barker, Chris & Jacobson, Pauline (eds.), Direct compositionality, 405–431. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Predelli, Stefano. 2003. Scare quotes and their relation to other semantic issues. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1940. Mathematical logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2000. Oratio obliqua, oratio recta: An essay on metarepresentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François. 2001. Open quotation. Mind 110, 637–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saka, Paul. 1998. Quotation and the use–mention distinction. Mind 107, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saka, Paul. 2011a. The act of quotation. In Brendel et al. (eds.), 303–322.Google Scholar
Saka, Paul. 2011b. Quotation and conceptions of language. Dialectica 65, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saka, Paul. 2011c. Does ‘“quotation”’ quote ‘quotation’? Protosociology Reviews, 1–8.Google Scholar
Saka, Paul. 2017. Blah, blah, blah: Quasi-quotation and unquotation. In Saka & Johnson (eds.), 35–63.Google Scholar
Saka, Paul & Johnson, Michael (eds.). 2017. The semantics and pragmatics of quotation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salkie, Raphael. 2016. The Proper Name Theory of quotation and indirect reported speech. In Capone, Alessandro, Kiefer, Ferenc & Piparo, Franco Lo (eds.), Indirect reports and pragmatics, 631–648. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality. An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, Chung-chieh. 2011. The character of quotation. Linguistics and Philosophy 33, 417–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsohatzidis, Savas L. 2005. Lost hopes and mixed quotes. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, Washington. 1992. Identity theory of quotation. Journal of Philosophy 89, 582–605.Google Scholar