Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T07:40:04.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reasonable Suspicion of Child abuse: Finding a Common Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Benjamin H. Levi  and
Sharon G. Portwood
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A father brings his six-year-old daughter and her older sister to their pediatrician to be evaluated for a history of cough, runny nose, and low-grade fever. In addition to signs of a cold, the girl's nasal bridge is quite swollen and bruised. When asked how her nose was injured, she shrugs, and her father's only conjecture is that she sleepwalks and might have bumped into something. The father sits impatiently and as questioning progresses becomes increasingly defensive, at one point angrily declaring, “We don't beat our kids, if that's what you’re asking.” Further complicating the situation is information from nurses that this family is “on the brink” socially and financially, and that additional stress is likely “to blow this family apart.” A careful physical exam identifies no other injuries, and a thorough review reveals no evidence of prior suspicious injuries, frequent visits to the emergency room, or bleeding abnormalities. The evidence does not point to abuse as the most likely explanation for the injury, but it clearly is not ruled out. Should one report this family for suspected abuse? Is one required to report?

Type
Independent
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , Spring 2011 , pp. 62 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonardi, D. J., Teachers’ Decisions to Report Child Abuse: The Effects of Ethnicity, Attitudes, and Experiences [Doctoral], Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, 2000; Flaherty Emalee, E. G., Jones, R., and Sege, R., “Telling Their Stories: Primary Care Practitioners’ Experience Evaluating and Reporting Injuries Caused By Child Abuse,” Child Abuse & Neglect 28, no. 9 (2004): 939–945; Flaherty, E. G., Sege, R., Mattson, C. L., and Binns, H. J., “Assessment of Suspicion of Abuse in the Primary Care Setting,” Ambulatory Pediatrics 2, no. 2 (2002): 120–126; Howe, A. C., Herzberger, S., and Tennen, H., “The Influence of Personal History of Abuse and Gender on Clinicians' Judgments of Child Abuse,” Journal of Family Violence 3, no. 2 (1988): 105–119; Melton, G. B., “Chronic Neglect of Family Violence: More Than a Decade of Reports to Guide US Policy,” Child Abuse & Neglect 26, nos. 6–7 (2002): 569–586; Tirosh, E., Offer, S. S., Cohen, A., Jaffe, M., “Attitudes towards Corporal Punishment and Reporting of Abuse,” Child Abuse & Neglect 27, no. 8 (2003): 929–937; Gunn, V. L., Hickson, G. B., and Cooper, W. O., “Factors Affecting Pediatricians' Reporting of Suspected Child Maltreatment,” Ambulatory Pediatrics 5, no. 2 (2005): 96–101.Google Scholar
Lane, W. G., Rubin, D. M., Monteith, R., and Christian, C. W., “Racial Differences in the Evaluation of Pediatric Fractures for Physical Abuse,” JAMA 288, no. 13 (2002): 1603–1609; Warner, J. E. and Hansen, D. J., “The Identification and Reporting of Physical Abuse by Physicians: A Review and Implications for Research,” Child Abuse & Neglect 18, no. 1 (1994): 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaronde, S., King, G., Bendel, R., Reece, R., “Opinions among Mandated Reporters toward Child Maltreatment Reporting Policies,” Child Abuse & Neglect 24, no. 7 (2000): 901–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applebaum, P. S., “Law & Psychiatry: Child Abuse Reporting Laws: Time for Reform?” Law & Psychiatry 50, no. 1 (1999): 27–29; Melton, G. B., “Mandated Reporting: A Policy without Reason,” Child Abuse & Neglect 29, no. 1 (2005): 9–18; Beck, K. A. and Coloff, J. R., “Child Abuse Reporting in British Columbia,” Research and Practice 26, no. 3 (1995): 245–251.Google Scholar
Levi Benjamin, B. H. and Loeben, G., “Index of Suspicion: Feeling Not Believing,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25, no. 4 (2004): 1–34.Google Scholar
Gaudiosi, J. A., Child Maltreatment 2007, US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children and Families and Youth, Children's Bureau, 2009.Google Scholar
Crume, T. L., DiGuiseppi, C., Byers, T., Sirotnak, A. P., and Garrett, C. J., “Underascertainment of Child Maltreatment Fatalities by Death Certificates, 1990–1998,” Pediatrics 110, no. 2, Pt. 1 (2002): e18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMillan, H. L., Fleming, J. E., Trocme, N., Boyle, M. H., Wong, M., and Racine, Y. A. et al., “Prevalence of Child Physical and Sexual Abuse in the Community: Results from the Ontario Health Supplement,” JAMA 278, no. 2 (1997): 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Gaudiosi, , supra note 6; Wyatt, G. E., Loeb, T. B., Solis, B., and Carmona, J. V., “The Prevalence and Circumstances of Child Sexual Abuse: Changes across a Decade,” Child Abuse & Neglect 23, no. 1 (1999): 45–60.Google Scholar
See Warner, and Hansen, , supra note 2; Gaudiosi, , supra note 6; Drake, B. and Zuravin, A., “Bias in Child Maltreatment Reporting: Revisiting the Myth of Classlessness,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 68, no. 2 (1998): 295–304; Finkelhor, D. and Jones, L., “Why Have Child Maltreatment and Child Victimization Declined?” Journal of Social Issues 62, no. 4 (2006): 685–716; Mersky, J. P., Berger, L. M., Reynolds, A. J., and Gromoske, A. N., “Risk Factors for Child and Adolescent Maltreatment A Longitudinal Investigation of a Cohort of Inner-City Youth,” Child Maltreatment 14, no. 1 (2009): 73–88.Google Scholar
Diaz, A., Simantov, E., Rickert, V. I., “Effect of Abuse on Health,” Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 156, no. 8 (2002): 811–817; Lansford, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., Crozier, J., and Kaplow, J., “A 12-Year Prospective Study of the Long-Term Effects of Early Child Physical Maltreatment on Psychological, Behavioral, and Academic Problems in Adolescence,” Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 156, no. 8 (2002): 824–830; MacMillan, H. L., Fleming, J. E., Streiner, D. L., Elizabeth, Lin, Boyle, M. H., and Jamieson, E. et al., “Childhood Abuse and Lifetime Psychopathology in a Community Sample,” American Journal of Psychiatry 158, no. 11 (2001): 1878–1883; Scheid, J. M., “Recognizing and Managing Long-Term Sequelae of Childhood Maltreatment,” Pediatric Annals 32, no. 6 (2003): 391–401; Widom, C. A., “Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Abused and Neglected Children Grown Up,” American Journal of Psychiatry 156, no. 8 (1999): 1223–1229; Gilbert, R., Widom, C. S., Browne, K., Fergusson, D., Webb, E., and Janson, S., “Child Maltreatment 1 Burden and Consequences of Child Maltreatment in High-Income Countries,” The Lancet 373, no. 9657 (2009): 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.-T. and Holton, J., “Total Estimated Cost of Child Abuse and Neglect in the United States,” Prevent Child Abuse America, Economic Impact Study, 2007, available at <http://www.preventchildabuse.org/about_us/media_releases/pcaa_pew_economic_impact_study_final.pdf> (last visited January 10, 2011).Google Scholar
See Melton, , supra note 4; Flaherty, E. G. and Sege, R., “Barriers to Physician Identification and Reporting of Child Abuse,” Pediatric Annals 34, no. 5 (2005): 349–356; Renke, W. N., “The Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse under the Child Welfare Act,” Health Law Journal 7, (1999): 91–140.Google Scholar
See Gaudiosi, , supra note 6.Google Scholar
Gateway Child Welfare Information, Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.Google Scholar
Saul Ornelas and Ismael Ornelas-Ledesma v. United States, 517 US 690 (1996); Myers, J. E. B., “Medicolegal Aspects of Suspected Child Abuse,” in Reece, R. M., Ludwig, S., eds., Child Abuse: Medical Diagnosis and Treatment (Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins, 2001): At 545–563.Google Scholar
See Applebaum, , supra note 4; Levi, , supra note 5; Deisz, R., Doueck, H., and George, N., “Reasonable Cause: A Qualitative Study of Mandated Reporting,” Child Abuse & Neglect 20, no. 4 (1996): 275–287; Kalichman, S. C., Mandated Reporting of Suspected Child Abuse: Ethics, Law, & Policy, 2nd ed. (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1999).Google Scholar
Levi, B. H. and Brown, G., “Reasonable Suspicion: A Study of Pennsylvania Pediatricians Regarding Child Abuse,” Pediatrics 116, no. 1 (2005): e5-e12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, B. H. and Crowell, K., “Child Abuse Experts Disagree about the Threshold for Mandated Reporting,” Clinical Pediatrics (published online December 6, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, B. H., Brown, G., and Erb, C., “Reasonable Suspicion: A Pilot Study of Pediatric Residents,” Child Abuse & Neglect 30, no. 4 (2006): 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, H. B., Markovic, J., Chaudhry, U., Ahart, S., and Torres, H., “Reabuse Rates in a Sample of Children Followed for 5 Years after Discharge from a Child Abuse Inpatient Assessment Program,” Child Abuse & Neglect 19, no. 11 (1995): 1363–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Though many states also stipulate that known abuse requires reporting, in all such instances the state statute identifies an additional threshold considerably lower than knowledge. As such, it is the lower threshold that defines mandated reporting.Google Scholar
See Levi, , supra note 5.Google Scholar
See Myers, , supra note 16.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Lowell Grover, 437 N.W.2d 60, 63 (MN S. Ct. 1989); Carl E. Gray v. State of Florida, 520 So2d 584 (FL S. Ct. 1988); People of the State of Michigan v. Alfred Cavaiani, 432 N.W.2d 409, 413 (MI App. Ct. 1988).Google Scholar
State of Missouri v. Leslie A. Brown, 140 SW3d 51 (MO S. Ct. 2004).Google Scholar
See Kalichmann, , supra note 17Google Scholar
See Levi, , supra note 5.Google Scholar
See Levi, , supra notes 18 and 20.Google Scholar
Connally v. General Construction Company, 269 U.S. 385, 391(S. Ct. 1926).Google Scholar
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1; 88 (S. Ct. 1968). Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Benjamin R. Reppert. 383 A.2d (PA Super 2001).Google Scholar
Of course, one might argue that reports of suspected abuse are different in that they merely initiate investigations, not prosecutions. As such, due process is not violated because (as for law enforcement) rigorous standards do exist for scrutinizing the actions of child protection services officials. What this argument ignores, however, is that child abuse investigations are not only invasive, they are often accusational, typically disruptive, and almost always very stressful. The constitutional protections contained in the fourth and fifth amendments to the U.S. Constitution recognize the significant hardships that can arise from unreasonable searches and indictments, even if no conviction ensues. In this regard, mandated reporters' apprehensions parallel those of police officers. The crucial difference is that police officers can be held accountable for their exercise of judgment, while mandated reporters enjoy almost unassailable immunity.Google Scholar
See Renke, , supra note 13; Wexler, R., Wounded Innocents: The Real Victims of the War Against Child Abuse (New York: Prometheus Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Richman, H. A., Neuhauser Lecture, “From a Radiologist's Judgment to Public Policy on Child Abuse and Neglect: What Have We Wrought?” Pediatric Radiology 30, no. 4 (2000): 219–228; Dupuy v. Samuels, F3d 493 (IL 7th Cir. Ct. 2005); Coleman, D., “Storming the Castle to Save the Children: The Ironic Costs of a Child Welfare Exception to the Fourth Amendment,” William and Mary Law Review 47, no. 94 (2005): 413–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Levi, , supra note 5; White, A. R., “Suspicion,” in Canfield, J. V., ed., Wittgenstein's Intentions (Hamden: Garland, 1993): At 81–85.Google Scholar
Schul, Y., Mayo, R., and Burnstein, E., “Encoding under Trust and Distrust: The Spontaneous Activation of Incongruent Cognitions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86, no. 5 (2004): 668–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, A. E. and Holden, G. W., “The Co-Occurrence of Spouse and Physical Child Abuse: A Review and Appraisal,” Journal of Family Psychology 12, no. 4 (1998): 578–599; Edleson, J. L., “The Overlap between Child Maltreatment and Woman Battering,” Violence Against Women 5, no. 2 (1999): 134–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., Cohen, P., Johnson, J. G., and Salzinger, S., “A Longitudinal Analysis of Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment: Findings of a 17-Year Prospective Study of Officially Recorded and Self-Reported Child Abuse and Neglect,” Child Abuse & Neglect 2, no. 11 (1998): 1065–1078; Giardino, A. P. and Giardino, E. R., Recognition of Child Abuse for the Mandated Reporter, 3rd ed. (St. Louis: G. W. Medical Publishing, Inc., 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id. (Giardino).Google Scholar
Sinai, S. H., Lawless, M. R., Rainey, D. Y., Everett, V. D., Runyan, D. K., and Frothingham, T. et al., “Clinician Agreement on Physical Findings in Child Sexual Abuse Cases,” Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 151, no. 5 (1997): 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, M. J., Hill, T. D., Siegel, R. M., “Barriers to Domestic Violence Screening in the Pediatric Setting,” Pediatrics 108, no. 1 (2001): 98–102; Van Haeringen, A. R., Dadds, M., and Armstrong, K. L., “The Child Abuse Lottery: Will the Doctor Suspect and Report? Physician Attitudes Towards and Reporting of Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect,” Child Abuse & Neglect 22, no. 3 (1998): 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Deisz, et al., supra note 17Google Scholar
Blacker, D. M., Reporting of Child Sexual Abuse: The Effects of Varying Definitions of Reasonable Suspicion on Psychologists' Reporting Behavior [Doctoral], California School of Professional Psychology, Berkeley/Alameda, 1998.Google Scholar
See Applebaum, , supra note 4; Melton, , supra note 4; Wexler, , supra note 34; Richman, , supra note 35; Coleman, , supra note 35; Singley, S. J., “Failure to Report Suspect Child Abuse: Civil Liability of Mandated Reporters,” Journal of Juvenile Law 19 (1998): 236–271.Google Scholar
Nelson, W., Reyna, V. F., Fagerlin, A., Lipkus, I., Peters, E., “Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice,” Annals of Behavioral Medicine 35, no. 3 (2008): 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teigen, K. H., “When Are Low-Probability Events Judged to Be “Probable”? Effects of Outcome-set Characteristics on Verbal Probability Estimates,” Acta Pschologica 68, no. 2 (1988): 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelli, J. S., “Communicating Forecast Uncertainty: Public Perception of Weather Forecast Uncertainty,” Meteorological Applications 17, no. 2 (2010): 180–195; Morss, R. E., Lazo, J. K., and Demuth, J. L., “Examining the Use of Weather Forecasts in Decision Scenarios: Results from a US Survey with Implications for Uncertainty Communication,” Meteorological Applications 17, no. 2 (2010): 149–162.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A., Death Foretold: Prophecy and Prognosis in Medical Care (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
See Blacker, , supra note 44; Flieger, C. L., Reporting Child Physical Abuse: The Effects of Varying Legal Definitions of Reasonable Suspicion on Psychologists' Child Abuse Reporting [Doctoral], Berkeley/Alameda, The California School of Professional Psychology, 1998.Google Scholar
Kagehiro, D. K., “Defining the Standard of Proof in Jury Instructions,” Psychological Science 1, no. 3 (1990): 194–200; Kagehiro, D. K. and Stanton, W. C., “Legal vs Quantified Definitions of Standards of Proof,” Law and Human Behavior 9, no. 2 (1985): 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. J. and Budescu, D. V., “Patterns of Preference for Numerical and Verbal Probabilities,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 10, no. 2 (1997): 117–131; Rapoport, A., Wallsten, T. S., Erev, I., and Cohen, B. L., “Revision of Opinion with Verbally and Numerically Expressed Uncertainties,” Acta Psychologica 74, no. 1 (1990): 61–79.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Levi, , supra notes 18, 19, and 20; Blacker, , supra note 44; and Flieger, , supra 50.Google Scholar