597 U.S. __ (2022).Google Scholar

Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance Act (EACH Act). H.R.2234 - EACH Act of 2021. The EACH Act ends the Hyde Amendment and guarantees coverage for abortion in all federal government-sponsored health plans. The EACH Act was reintroduced in the House of Representatives on January 26, 2023, available at < https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2234/text> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

“Tracking the States Where Abortion Is Now Banned,” New York Times, September 19, 2023.Google Scholar

Society of Family Planning, #WeCount Report: April 2022 to March 2023 (2023), available at <https://societyfp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/WeCountReport_6.12.23.pdf> (last visited September 20, 2023).+(last+visited+September+20,+2023).>Google Scholar

Supra note 2.Google Scholar

Guttmacher Institute, “An Overview of Abortion Laws,” June 1, 2023, available at <https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

See generally Guttmacher Institute, “Regulating Insurance Coverage of Abortion,” February 1, 2023, available at <https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/regulating-insurance-coverage-abortion> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. L. No. 116-260, div. H, tit. V, §§ 506-507. The current version of the Hyde Amendment reads, [N]one of the [Hyde Amendment] limitations shall apply “(1) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or (2) In the case where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself that would, as certified by a physician place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed [emphasis added].Google Scholar

J. Rovner, “Abortion Funding Ban has Evolved Over the Years” NPR, Dec. 14, 2009, available at <https://www.npr.org/2009/12/14/121402281/abortion-funding-ban-has-evolved-over-the-years> (last visited February 17, 2023); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention “Surveillance Summary Abortion Surveillance: Preliminary Analysis, 1979-1980 -- United States,” MMWR 32, no. 5 (1983): 62-4, available at <https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001243.htm> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+February+17,+2023);+Centers+for+Disease+Control+and+Prevention+“Surveillance+Summary+Abortion+Surveillance:+Preliminary+Analysis,+1979-1980+--+United+States,”+MMWR+32,+no.+5+(1983):+62-4,+available+at++(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

KFF, “Births Financed by Medicaid,” 2020, available at <https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/births-financed-by-medicaid/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D (last visited June 21, 2023).Google Scholar

Guttmacher Institute, “The Hyde Amendment: A Discriminatory Ban on Insurance Coverage of Abortion,” May 2021, available at <https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/hyde-amendment> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

J. Jerman, R.K. Jones, and T. Onda, “Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients in 2014 and Changes Since 2008,” Guttmacher Institute, May 2016, available at <www.guttmacher.org/report/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014> (last visited November 1, 2022).+(last+visited+November+1,+2022).>Google Scholar

Finer, L.B. and Zolna, M.R., “Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011,” New England Journal Medicine 374, no. 9 (2016): 843–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

See Jerman et al., supra note 15.Google Scholar

R. Bleiweis, D. Boesch, and A. Cawthorne Gaines, “The Basic Facts About Women in Poverty,” Center for American Progress, Aug. 3, 2020, available at <https://www.americanprogress.org/article/basic-facts-women-poverty/> (last visited Nov. 2, 2022).+(last+visited+Nov.+2,+2022).>Google Scholar

Roberts, S.C.M., Berglas, N. F., and Kimport, K., “Complex Situations: Economic Insecurity, Mental Health, and Substance Use Among Pregnant Women who Consider - But Do Not Have – Abortions,” PLoS One 15, no. 1 (2020): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Upadhyay, U.D., McCook, A.A., Bennett, A. H., Cartwright, A. F., and Roberts, S.C.M., “State Abortion Policies and Medicaid Coverage of Abortion are Associated with Pregnancy Outcomes Among Individuals Seeking Abortion Recruited using Google Ads: A National Cohort Study,” Social Science and Medicine (2021): 274–276.Google Scholar

See generally, Guttmacher Institute, “State Funding of Abortion Under Medicaid,” June 1, 2023, available at <https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-funding-abortion-under-medicaid> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

Roberts, S.C.M., Kimport, K., Kriz, R., et al., “Consideration of and Reasons for Not Obtaining Abortion Among Women Entering Prenatal Care in Southern Louisiana and Baltimore, Maryland,” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 16 (2019): 476–487; S.K. Henshaw, T.J. Joyce, A. Dennis, L.B. Finer, and K. Blanchard, “Restrictions on Medicaid Funding for Abortions: A Literature Review,” Guttmacher Institute, June 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, A. and Blanchard, K., “Abortion Providers’ Experiences with Medicaid Abortion Coverage Policies: a Qualitative Multistate Study,” Health Services Research 48, no. 1 (2013): 236–252; D. Bessett, K. Gorski, D. Jinadasa, M. Ostrow, and M.J. Peterson, “Out of Time and Out of Pocket: Experiences of Women Seeking State-subsidized Insurance for Abortion Care in Massachusetts,” Women’s Health Issues 21, no. 3 Supp (2011): S21-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

W.H. Frey, “Six Maps that Reveal America’s Expanding Racial Diversity. A Pre-2020 Census Look at the Wide Dispersal of the Nation’s Hispanic, Asian, and Black Populations,” Brookings, September 5, 2019, available at <https://www.brookings.edu/research/americas-racial-diversity-in-six-maps/> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

See Guttmacher Institute, supra note 21.Google Scholar

U. Ranji, K. Diep, and A. Salganicoff, “Key Facts on Abortion in the United States,” Kaiser Family Foundation, May 11, 2023, available at <https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/report/key-facts-on-abortion-in-the-united-states/> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

Upadhyay, U.D., Ahlbach, C., Kaller, S., Cook, C., and Muñoz, I., “Trends In Self-Pay Charges And Insurance Acceptance For Abortion In The United States, 2017-20,” Health Affairs (Millwood) 41, no. 4 (2022): 507–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, “Economic well-being of U.S Households in 2020-May 2021,” available at <https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/2021-economic-well-being-of-us-households-in-2020-dealing-with-unexpected-expenses.htm> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

Rice, W.S., Labgold, K., Peterson, Q.T., Higdon, M., and Njoku, O., “Sociodemographic and Service Use Characteristics of Abortion Fund Cases from Six States in the U.S. Southeast,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 7 (2021): 3813–3839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reproductive Justice, SisterSong available at <https://www.sistersong.net/reproductive-justice> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

Addante, A.N., Eisenberg, D.L., Valentine, M.C., Leonard, J., Maddox, K.E.J., and Hoofnagle, M.H., “The Association Between State-level Abortion Restrictions and Maternal Mortality in the United States, 1995-2017,” Contraception 104, no. 5 (2021): 496–501; D. Vilda, M.E. Wallace, C. Daniel, M.G. Evans, C. Stoecker, and K.P. Theall, “State Abortion Policies and Maternal Death in the United States, 2015–2018,” American Journal of Public Health 111, no. 9 (2021): 1696-1704; R. Pabayo, A. Ehntholt, D.M. Cook, M. Reynolds, P. Muennig, and S.Y. Liu, “Laws Restricting Access to Abortion Services and Infant Mortality Risk in the United States,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 11 (2020): 3773-3787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

See Addante et al., supra note 31.Google Scholar

See Pabayo et al., supra note 31.Google Scholar

“Maternal Mortality rate by State 2022,” available at <https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/maternal-mortality-rate-by-state> (last visited June 21, 2023).+(last+visited+June+21,+2023).>Google Scholar

U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, “VA Will Offer Abortion Counseling and — in Certain Cases — Abortions to Pregnant Veterans and VA Beneficiaries,” Press Release, September 2 2022, available at <https://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=5820> (last visited August 17, 2023).+(last+visited+August+17,+2023).>Google Scholar

See 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.Google Scholar

See U.S. Dep’t Health & Human Serv., Dear State Medicaid Director Letter (Dec. 28, 1993); U.S. Dep’t Health & Human Serv., Dear State Medicaid Director Letter (Feb. 12, 1998).Google Scholar

See, e.g., Elizabeth Blackwell Health Ctr. For Women v. Knoll, 61 F.3d 170 (3d Cir. 1995).Google Scholar

See, e.g., Hern v. Beye, 57 F.3d 906, 909 (10th Cir. 1995).Google Scholar

U.S. Dep’t Health & Human Serv., Dear State Medicaid Director (Feb. 12, 1998).Google Scholar

See, e.g., Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Mich. v. Engler, 73 F.3d 634 (6th Cir. 1996).Google Scholar

But see, e.g., Hope Med. Grp. For Women v. Edwards, 63 F.3d 418 (5th Cir. 1995) (holding that the Hyde Amendment does not create any independent obligations on States participating in the Medicaid Program to fund abortions permitted by the Amendment. Nevertheless, the court ultimately held that Louisiana’s abortion funding restriction still violated Title XIX. The court explained that Louisiana’s restriction was inconsistent with the objectives of the Medicaid Act, because the restriction “categorically limit[ed] abortions offered through the state’s Medicaid program to life and death situations without regard to the medical necessity of abortions in rape and incest cases”).Google Scholar

Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Mich. v. Engler, 73 F.3d 634 (6th Cir. 1996).Google Scholar

See “Tracking the States Where Abortion Is Now Banned,” supra note 3; Society of Family Planning, supra note 4; The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, ACOG Statement on the Decision in Dobbs v. Jackson, June 24, 2022, available at <https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2022/06/acog-statement-on-the-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson> (last visited June 21, 2023); D. Grossman, C. Joffe, S. Kaller, K. Kimport, E. Kinsey, K. Lerma, N. Morris, and K. White, “Care Post-Roe: Documenting Cases of Poor-Quality Care Since the Dobbs Decision, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH),” University of California, San Francisco, 2023; Stephenson-Famy, A., Sonn, T., Baecher-Lind, L., Bhargava, R., Chen, K.T., Fleming, A., Kang Morgan, H., Morosky, C.M., Schaffir, J.A., Madani Sims, S., Sutton, J.M., and Royce, C.S., “Undergraduate Medical Education Committee of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics. The Dobbs Decision and Undergraduate Medical Education: The Unintended Consequences and Strategies to Optimize Reproductive Health and a Competent Workforce for the Future,” Academic Medicine 98, no. 4 (2023): 431–435; A. Seitz, “As South Bans Abortion, Thousands Turn to Illinois Clinics,” AP News, March 25, 2023, available at <https://apnews.com/article/abortion-bans-illinois-clinic-south-travel-demand-a30afcbd022cdeeb92b9aa5788421687> (last visited August 17, 2023); T. Johnson and K. Butler, “Abortion ‘Desert’ in US South is Hurting Black Women the Most,” Al Jazeera, Aug 23 2022, available at <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/23/abortion-desert-in-us-south-is-hurting-black-women-the-most> (last visited August 17, 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biggs, M.A., Upadhyay, U., McCulloch, C.E., and Foster, D.G., “Women’s Mental Health and Well-Being Five Years after Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study,” JAMA Psychology 74, no. 2 (2017): 169–178; M.A. McCarthy, U. Upadhyay, L. Ralph, M.A. Biggs, and D.G. Foster, “The Effect of Receiving Versus Being Denied an Abortion on Making and Achieving Aspirational 5-year Life Plans,” BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health 46, no. 3 (2020): 177-183; S. Miller, L. Wherry, and D.G. Foster, “The Economic Consequences of Being Denied an Abortion,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 15, no. 1 (2023): 394-437; D.G. Foster, L.J. Ralph, M.A. Biggs, C. Gerdts, S.C.M. Roberts, and M.A. Glymour, “Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women who Receive and Women who are Denied Wanted Abortions,” American Journal of Public Health 108, no. 3 (2018): 407-413.Google ScholarPubMed