Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-vhqbp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T05:13:54.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-term results of revision stapes surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Eero Vartiainen ,
Juhani Nuutinen  and
Jukka Virtaniemi
Eero Vartiainen*
Affiliation:
Kuopio, Finland
Juhani Nuutinen
Affiliation:
Kuopio, Finland
Jukka Virtaniemi
Affiliation:
Kuopio, Finland
*
Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital of Kuopio, SF-70200 Kuopio, Finland. Fax: 358-71-172509
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results of 45 re-operations for persistent or recurrent conductive deafness after primary stapes surgery were studied. The mean follow-up period after the revision surgery was 7.6 years. Long-term hearing results were found to be disappointing, air-bone gap to within 10 dB was achieved in only 46 per cent of the patients. Mean hearing levels improved by 11 dB or more in 73 per cent. Outcome of surgery was dependent on the surgical pathology, the best hearing results were obtained in cases with re-fixation after stapes mobilization operation. Sensorineural hearing loss as a result of surgical trauma to the inner ear occurred in revision surgery more frequently than in primary operations, cases with regrowth of otosclerotic bone to the oval window after stapedectomy having the greatest risk of labyrinthine trauma.

Keywords

OtosclerosisStapes surgerySurgical revision

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 106 , Issue 11 , November 1992 , pp. 971 - 973
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bhardwaj, B. K., Kacker, S. K. (1988) Revision stapes surgery. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 102: 20–24.Google Scholar
Crabtree, J. A., Britton, B. H., Powers, W. H. (1980) An evaluation of revision stapes surgery. Laryngoscope, 90, 224–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derlacki, E. L. (1985) Revision stapes surgery: problems with some solutions. Laryngoscope, 95, 1047–1053.Google Scholar
Farrior, J., Sutherland, A. (1991) Revision stapes surgery. Laryngoscope, 101, 1155–1161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glasscock, M. E., McKennan, K. X., Levine, S. C. (1987) Revision stapedectomy surgery. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 96, 141–148.Google Scholar
Palva, T., Ramsay, H. (1990) Revision surgery for otosclerosis. Ada Oto-Laryngologica, 110, 416–420.Google Scholar
Pearman, K., Dawes, D. K. (1982) Post-stapedectomy conductive deafness and results of revision surgery. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 96, 405–410.Google Scholar
Shea, J. J. (1988) Thirty years of stapes surgery. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 102: 14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, G. D. L. (1982) Recent and future trends in the management of otosclerotic conductive hearing loss. Clinical Otolaryngology, 7, 153–160.Google Scholar