Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-27T10:36:52.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation of vocal cord palsy aetiology: timing and relevance of imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2024

Bahareh Bakhshaie Philipsen Open the ORCID record for Bahareh Bakhshaie Philipsen [Opens in a new window] ,
Jacob Mølstrøm ,
Camilla Slot Mehlum  and
Gitte Bjørn Hvilsom
Bahareh Bakhshaie Philipsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, ZL, Denmark
Jacob Mølstrøm
Affiliation:
Department of Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, SYD, Denmark
Camilla Slot Mehlum
Affiliation:
Department of Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, SYD, Denmark
Gitte Bjørn Hvilsom
Affiliation:
Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, ZL, Denmark
*
Corresponding author: Bahareh Bakhshaie Philipsen; Email: bphilipsen@health.sdu.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate imaging modalities utilized in patients with vocal cord palsy (VCP) of unknown aetiology, emphasizing the significance of timing and diagnostic yield.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients diagnosed with VCP of unknown aetiology after their initial clinical examination between 2005 and 2016.

Results

In our cohort, 46 out of 173 (27 per cent) patients were diagnosed with malignancies. All malignancies were identified during the initial imaging examination, except for one patient. Diagnostic imaging facilitated the diagnosis in 36 per cent of the patients. Computed tomography (CT) of the neck and chest and full-body positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) presented the highest overall diagnostic yield of 36 per cent and 35 per cent, respectively.

Conclusion

We recommend that patients with initial CT of the neck and upper chest or PET-CT combined with magnetic resonance imaging without pathological findings, are followed without additional imaging examinations, unless new relevant symptoms arise.

Keywords

CTfollow-up MRIPETultrasoundvocal cord palsyvocal cord paralysisvocal cord paralyses

Information

Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , First View , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Bahareh Bakhshaie Philipsen takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Chen, HC, Jen, YM, Wang, CH, Lee, JC, Lin, YS. Etiology of vocal cord paralysis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2007;69:167–71Google Scholar
Chen, Z, King, W, Pearcey, R, Kerba, M, Mackillop, WJ. The relationship between waiting time for radiotherapy and clinical outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Radiother Oncol 2008;87:3–16Google Scholar
El Badawey, MR, Punekar, S, Zammit-Maempel, I. Prospective study to assess vocal cord palsy investigations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:788–90Google Scholar
Gupta, J, Varshney, S, Bist, SS, Bhagat, S. Clinico-etiolological study of vocal cord paralysis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65:16–19Google Scholar
Mehlum, CS, Faber, CE, Grøntved, AM, Andersen, P. [Vocal fold palsy–investigation and follow-up]. Ugeskr Laeger 2009;171:113–17Google Scholar
Bilici, S, Yildiz, M, Yigit, O, Misir, E. Imaging modalities in the etiologic evaluation of unilateral vocal fold paralysis. J Voice 2019;33:813.e1–e5Google Scholar
Noel, JE, Jeffery, CC, Damrose, E. Repeat imaging in idiopathic unilateral vocal fold paralysis: is it necessary? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2016;125:1010–14Google Scholar
Paddle, PM, Mansor, MB, Song, PC, RA, Franco Jr. Diagnostic yield of computed tomography in the evaluation of idiopathic vocal fold paresis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;153:414–19Google Scholar
MacGregor, FB, Roberts, DN, Howard, DJ, Phelps, PD. Vocal fold palsy: a re-evaluation of investigations. J Laryngol Otol 1994;108:193–6Google Scholar
Roennegaard, AB, Rosenberg, T, Bjørndal, K, Sørensen, JA, Johansen, J, Godballe, C. The Danish Head and Neck Cancer fast-track program: a tertiary cancer centre experience. Eur J Cancer 2018;90:133–9Google Scholar
Sorensen, JR, Johansen, J, Gano, L, Sørensen, JA, Larsen, SR, Andersen, PB, et al. A “package solution” fast track program can reduce the diagnostic waiting time in head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:1163–70Google Scholar
Terris, DJ, Arnstein, DP, Nguyen, HH. Contemporary evaluation of unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;107:84–90Google Scholar
Seyed Toutounchi, SJ, Eydi, M, Golzari, SE, Ghaffari, MR, Parvizian, N. Vocal cord paralysis and its etiologies: a prospective study. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2014;6:47–50Google Scholar
Kang, BC, Roh, J-L, Lee, JH, Jung, JH, Choi, SH, Nam, SY, et al. Usefulness of computed tomography in the etiologic evaluation of adult unilateral vocal fold paralysis. World J Surg 2013;37:1236–40Google Scholar
Glazer, HS, Aronberg, DJ, Lee, JK, Sagel, SS. Extralaryngeal causes of vocal cord paralysis: CT evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;141:527–31Google Scholar
Wang, C-P, Chen, T-C, Lou, P-J, Yang, T-L, Hu, Y-L, Shieh, M-J, et al. Neck ultrasonography for the evaluation of the etiology of adult unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Head Neck 2012;34:643–8Google Scholar
Badia, PI, Hillel, AT, Shah, MD, MM, Johns III, Klein, AM. Computed tomography has low yield in the evaluation of idiopathic unilateral true vocal fold paresis. Laryngoscope 2013;123:204–7Google Scholar
Dankbaar, JW, Pameijer, FA. Vocal cord paralysis: anatomy, imaging and pathology. Insights Imaging 2014;5:743–51Google Scholar
Rohde, M, Nielsen, AL, Pareek, M, Johansen, J, Sørensen, JA, Diaz, A, et al. A PET/CT-based strategy is a stronger predictor of survival than a standard imaging strategy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2018;59:575–81Google Scholar
Thomassen, A, Nielsen, AL, Lauridsen, JK, Blomberg, BA, Hess, S, Petersen, H, et al. FDG-PET/CT can rule out malignancy in patients with vocal cord palsy. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014;4:193–201Google Scholar
Heller, MT, Meltzer, CC, Fukui, MB, Rosen, CA, Chander, S, Martinelli, MA, et al. Superphysiologic FDG uptake in the non-paralyzed vocal cord. Resolution of a false-positive PET result with combined PET-CT imaging. Clin Positron Imaging 2000;3:207–11Google Scholar
Minamimoto, R, Kubota, K, Morooka, M, Ito, K, Mitsumoto, T, Okasaki, M, et al. Reevaluation of FDG-PET/CT in patients with hoarseness caused by vocal cord palsy. Ann Nucl Med 2012;26:405–11Google Scholar
Rohde, M, Dyrvig, A-K, Johansen, J, Sørensen, JA, Gerke, O, Nielsen, AL, et al. 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:2271–9Google Scholar
Tsikoudas, A, Paleri, V, El-Badawey, MR, Zammit-Maempel, I. Recommendations on follow-up strategies for idiopathic vocal fold paralysis: evidence-based review. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:570–3Google Scholar