Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-w6wnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T00:17:48.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation explantation in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2024

Zachary Chu
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Chen Zhang
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Enoch Kwok
Affiliation:
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Yaoyi Ng
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Tony Tang
Affiliation:
Yale-NUS College, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Song Tar Toh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Singhealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore
Shaun Loh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Singhealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore
John Loh*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
*
Corresponding author: John Loh; Email: john.loh.m.r@singhealth.com.sg

Abstract

Objective

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for obstructive sleep apnoea patients who are intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure therapy. This paper aimed to explore reasons for hypoglossal nerve stimulation device explantation and associated complications.

Methods

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search across Embase Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane library yielded 14 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were (1) systematic reviews and meta-analyses, conference posters and editorials; (2) non-English studies; and (3) studies published before 2010.

Results

Of the 121 patients identified as having undergone hypoglossal nerve stimulation device explantation, 126 reasons were identified for the procedure. The primary reasons included device malfunction (19.8 per cent), infection (19.0 per cent) and device migration (18.3 per cent). Other reasons included discomfort (9.5 per cent), improper placement (6.3 per cent) and ineffective devices (6.3 per cent). Complications were infrequent (2.48 per cent).

Conclusion

Device malfunction, infection and device migration were prominent reasons for hypoglossal nerve stimulation device explantation. Complications post-explantation were rare but included temporary hypoglossal paresis.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

John Ming Ren Loh takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Presented at event title, date month year, town/city, state abbreviation (if in USA), country.

References

Jordan, AS, McSharry, DG, Malhotra, A. Adult obstructive sleep apnoea. Lancet 2014;383:736–47Google Scholar
Yu, JL, Thaler, ER. Hypoglossal nerve (cranial nerve XII) stimulation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2020;53:157–69Google Scholar
Olson, MD, Junna, MR. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Neurotherapeutics 2021;18:91–9Google Scholar
Patel, AU, Yalamanchi, P, Peddireddy, NS, Hoff, PT. Hypoglossal nerve stimulator explantation: a case series. OTO Open 2022;6:2473974X221106778Google Scholar
Arens, P, Penzel, T, Fietze, I, Blau, A, Weller, B, Olze, H, et al. Safety and effectiveness in explantation and re-implantation of hypoglossal nerve stimulation devices. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021;278:477–83Google Scholar
Bestourous, DE, Pasick, LJ, Benito, DA, Zapanta, PE. Adverse events associated with the Inspire implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulator: a MAUDE database review. Am J Otolaryngol 2020;41:102616Google Scholar
Deep, NL, Hines, JP, Parish, JM, Hinni, ML, Bansberg, SF. Subpectoral implantation of the hypoglossal nerve stimulator: an effective technical modification. Laryngoscope 2019;129:2420–3Google Scholar
Kezirian, EJ, Goding, GS, Jr., Malhotra, A, O’Donoghue, FJ, Zammit, G, Wheatley, JR, et al. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation improves obstructive sleep apnea: 12-month outcomes. J Sleep Res 2014;23:7783Google Scholar
Macielak, RJ, Olson, EJ, Junna, MR, Olson, MD. Contralateral rerouting of hypoglossal nerve implant pulse generator and stimulation lead. Laryngoscope 2021;131:E240912Google Scholar
Pomerantz, J, Freedom, T, Nickley, K, Bhayani, M, Gerber, M, Freedman, N, et al. 0540 upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 2018;41(suppl 1):A202Google Scholar
Steffen, A, Sommer, JU, Hofauer, B, Maurer, JT, Hasselbacher, K, Heiser, C. Outcome after one year of upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea in a multicenter German post-market study. Laryngoscope 2018;128:509–15Google Scholar
Suurna, MV, Steffen, A, Boon, M, Chio, E, Copper, M, Patil, RD, et al. Impact of body mass index and discomfort on upper airway stimulation: ADHERE Registry 2020 update. Laryngoscope 2021;131:2616–24Google Scholar
Tabatabai, GM, Karempelis, P, Hsia, JC. Hypoglossal nerve stimulator generator migration: INSPIRE device reimplantation with parallels to cardiac implantable electronic devices. Am J Otolaryngol 2018;39:639–41Google Scholar
Taylor Ii, J, Yu, JL. Hypoglossal nerve stimulator explantation technique and outcomes: a retrospective case series. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2023;85:248–52Google Scholar
Urban, MJ, Calder, A, Jhaveri, M, LoSavio, P. Computed tomography scanning of implanted hypoglossal nerve stimulators and approach to device malfunction: case series. J Laryngol Otol 2023;137:231–6Google Scholar
Vasconcellos, AP, Huntley, CT, Schell, AE, Soose, RJ, Boon, MS. Dysfunctional hypoglossal nerve stimulator after electrical cardioversion: a case series. Laryngoscope 2019;129:1949–53Google Scholar
Woodson, BT, Soose, RJ, Gillespie, MB, Strohl, KP, Maurer, JT, de Vries, N, et al. Three-year outcomes of cranial nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: the STAR trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;154:181–8Google Scholar
Strohl, MM, Yamauchi, M, Peng, Z, Strohl, KP. Insights since FDA approval of hypoglossal nerve stimulation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Curr Sleep Med Rep 2017;3:133–41Google Scholar
Maurer, JT, Van de Heyning, P, Lin, H-S, Baskin, J, Anders, C, Hohenhorst, W, et al. Operative technique of upper airway stimulation: an implantable treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;23:227–33Google Scholar
Tarakji, KG, Mittal, S, Kennergren, C, Corey, R, Poole, JE, Schloss, E, et al. Antibacterial envelope to prevent cardiac implantable device infection. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1895–905Google Scholar
Korotun, M, Quintero, L, Shikowitz, M, Mayo, P, Greenberg, H. Optimization of hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea with ultrasound assessment of tongue movement. Am J Ther 2021;29:e20511Google Scholar
Miglani, A, Mecham, JC, Hines, JP, Hinni, ML, Miller, BW, Bansberg, SF. Hypoglossal nerve stimulator twiddler’s syndrome. Laryngoscope 2021;131:E101921Google Scholar
Mashaqi, S, Patel, SI, Combs, D, Estep, L, Helmick, S, Machamer, J, et al. The hypoglossal nerve stimulation as a novel therapy for treating obstructive sleep apnea – a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:1642Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chu et al. supplementary material

Chu et al. supplementary material
Download Chu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 42.3 KB