Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-6kn8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:52:43.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Naturalizing the market on the road to revisionism: Bruce Caldwell's Hayek's challenge and the challenge of Hayek interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

PHILIP MIROWSKI
PHILIP MIROWSKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Policy Studies, University of Notre Dame
*
*Correspondence to: Department of Economics and Policy Studies, University of Notre Dame. Email: mirowski.1@nd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Bruce Caldwell's Hayek's Challenge should be welcomed as the first serious book on one of the most important thinkers of the twentieth century. However, this review begins by pointing out a number of curious omissions and silences concerning Hayek's career in the book. We propose that the key to understanding the turns and reversals in his thought lay in his politics, and not as Caldwell has it, in some abstract philosophical doctrines. Central to that thesis is Hayek's fostering the development of Neoliberalism through such institutional structures as the Mont Pèlerin Society.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 351 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Angner, Erik 2004, ‘Did Hayek Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy?’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26: 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angner, Eric 2006, ‘Response to Caldwell and Reiss’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28: 371–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce 2001, ‘Hodgson on Hayek: A Critique’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25: 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce and Reiss, Julien 2006, ‘Did Hayek Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy?’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28: 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1963, ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in Schlipp, Paul (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Cockett, Richard 1995, Thinking the Unthinkable: Think Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–83, London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Ebenstein, Alan 2001, Friedrich Hayek: A Biography, New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald and Richardson, Alan (eds) 1996, Origins of Logical Empiricism, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Malachi, Hacohen 2000, Karl Popper: The Formative Years, 1902–45, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, Gary and Richardson, Alan (eds) 2003, Logical Empiricism in North America, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hartwell, R. Max 1995, A History of the Mont Pèlerin Society, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Harvey, David 2005, A Brief History of Neoliberalism, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich 1962, Preface to English Language Edition of Heinrich Rickert, Science and History, New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich 1967, Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich 1972, Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: Gateway.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich 1973, Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich 1979 [1952], The Counter-Revolution of Science, Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich 1982, ‘The Sensory Order after 25 Years’, in Weimer, W. and Palermo, D. (eds), Cognition and the Symbolic Process, Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey 2004, ‘Hayekian evolution reconsidered: a response to Caldwell’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28: 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klausinger, HansJorg 2006, ‘In the Wilderness: Emigration and Decline of the Austrian School’, History of Political Economy, 38: 617–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makowski, Louis and Ostroy, Joseph 2001, ‘Perfect Competition and the Creativity of the Market’, Journal of Economic Literature, 39: 479–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGucken, William 1984, Scientists, Society and the State, Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip 2002a Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip 2002b, Review of Malachi Hacohen's Karl Popper, Isis (June): 324–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip 2004, ‘The Scientific Dimensions of Social Thought and Their Distant Echoes in American 20th Century Philosophy of Science’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 283–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter (eds) forthcoming, The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip and vanHorn, Robert forthcoming, ‘The Origins of the Chicago School’, in Mirowski and Plehwe (forthcoming).Google Scholar
O'Neill, John 2003, ‘Socialism, Associations and the Market’, Economy and Society, 32: 184–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Mary 1993, Auguste Comte, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plehwe, Dieter and Walpen, Bernhard 2005, ‘Between Network and Complex Organization: The Making of Neoliberal Knowledge and Hegemony’, in Plehwe, Dieter, Walpen, Bernhard, and Neunhöffer, Gisela (eds), Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shearmur, Jeremy 1994, ‘Hayek and the Case for the Market’, in Birner, Jack and van Zijp, Rudy (eds), Hayek, Coordination and Evolution, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Vernon 1982, ‘Markets as Economizers of Information: Experimental Examination of the Hayek hypothesis’, Economic Inquiry, 20: 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Vernon 2003, ‘Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics’, American Economic Review, 93: 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, Friedrich 2001, The Vienna Circle, Vienna: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Stonier, Alfred 1943, ‘Miscellaneous Note’, Economica (May): 188.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas 1995, ‘Otto Neurath's Idealist Inheritance’, Synthese, 103: 87–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uebel, Thomas 2000, ‘Some Scientism, Some Historicism, Some Critics: Hayek's and Popper's Critiques Revisited’, in Stone, M. and Wolff, J. (eds), The Proper Ambition of Science, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weimer, W. and Palermo, D. (eds) 1982, Cognition and Symbolic Processes, vol. 2, Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wilson, David, Dietrich, Eric, and Clark, Anne 2003, ‘On the Inappropriate Use of the Naturalistic Fallacy in Evolutionary Psychology’, Biology and Philosophy, 18: 669–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar