Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T09:00:33.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution as computation: integrating self-organization with generalized Darwinism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2011

ERIC D. BEINHOCKER
ERIC D. BEINHOCKER*
Affiliation:
McKinsey Global Institute, London, UK
*
*Email: eric.beinhocker@mckinsey.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Generalized Darwinism and self-organization have been positioned as competing frameworks for explaining processes of economic and institutional change. Proponents of each view question the ontological validity and explanatory power of the other. This paper argues that information theory, rooted in modern thermodynamics, offers the potential to integrate these two perspectives in a common and rigorous framework. Both evolution and self-organization can be generalized as computational processes that can be applied to human social phenomena. Under this view, evolution is a process of algorithmic search through a combinatorial design space, while self-organization is the result of non-zero sum gains from information aggregation. Evolution depends on the existence of self-organizing forces, and evolution acts on designs for self-organizing structures. The framework yields insights on the role of agency and the emergence of novelty. The paper concludes that information theory may provide a fundamental ontological basis for economic and institutional evolution.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 7 , Special Issue 3: Evolution of Institutions , September 2011 , pp. 393 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adleman, L. M. (1994), ‘Molecular Computation of Solutions to a Combinatorial Problem’, Science, 266 (5187): 1021–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, A. (1950), ‘Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 58 (3): 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H, Hodgson, G. M., Hull, D. L., Knudsen, T., Mokyr, J., and Vanberg, V. J. (2008), ‘In Defense of Generalized Darwinism’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18 (5): 577–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Leschhorn, H., Maass, P., Salinger, M. A., Stanley, H. E., and Stanley, M. H. R. (1997), ‘Scaling Behavior in Economics: I. Empirical Results for Company Growth’, Journal de Physique I, 7 (4): 621–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Salinger, M. A., and Stanley, H. E. (1998), ‘Power Law Scaling for a System of Interacting Units With Complex Internal Structure’, Physical Review Letters, 80 (7): 1385–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (1995), ‘Complexity in Economic and Financial Markets’, Complexity, 1 (1): 20–25.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (2009), The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B., Durlauf, S. N., and Lane, D. A. (eds.) (1997), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Axtell, R. L. (1999), ‘The Emergence of Firms in a Population of Agents: Local Increasing Returns, Unstable Nash Equilibria, and Power Law Size Distributions’, Brookings Institution, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics working paper no. 3.Google Scholar
Axtell, R. L. (2001), ‘Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes’, Science, 293 (5536): 1818–1820.Google Scholar
Bais, F. A. and Farmer, J. D. (2008), ‘The Physics of Information’, in Adriaans, P. and Benthem, J. V. (eds.), Philosophy of Information, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 609–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BauerR. J., Jr. R. J., Jr. (1994), Genetic Algorithms and Investment Strategies, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Beinhocker, E. D. (2006), The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity and the Radical Remaking of Economics, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, L. M. (2009), ‘The Rules of Information Aggregation and Emergence of Collective Intelligent Behavior’, Topics in Cognitive Science, 1 (4): 598–620.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. (2005), The Origin and Evolution of Cultures, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braha, D. and Maimon, O. (1998), A Mathematical Theory of Design: Foundations, Algorithms and Applications, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2001), Genes, Peoples, and Languages, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960), ‘Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes’, Psychological Review, 67 (6): 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, G. (2007), ‘A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World’, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, D., Goldberg, M., Haas, A., Juselius, K., Kirman, A., Lux, T., and Sloth, B. (2009), ‘The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of the Economics Profession’, Critical Review, 21 (2): 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordes., C. (2006), ‘Darwinism in Economics: from Analogy to Continuity’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16 (5): 529–541.Google Scholar
Cover, T. M. and Thomas, J. A. (2008), Elements of Information Theory, 2nd edn, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crutchfield, J. P. and Schuster, P. (2003), Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Interplay of Selection, Accident, Neutrality, and Function, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, H. E. (1999), Ecological Economics and the Ecology of Economics, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Davies, P. and Gregersen, N. H. (eds.) (2010), Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Jong, K. A. (2006), Evolutionary Computation: A Unified Approach, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1995), Darwin's Dangerous Idea, New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Dopfer, K and Potts, J. (2004), ‘Evolutionary Realism: a New Ontology for Economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11 (2): 195–212.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1927), The Nature of the Physical World, 1935 edn, Folcroft, PA: Folcroft Library.Google Scholar
Epstein, J. M. (ed.) (2006), Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Flake, G. W. (1998), The Computational Beauty of Nature: Computer Explorations of Fractals, Chaos, Complex Systems, and Adaptation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friedberg, R. (1959), ‘A Learning Machine: Part I’, IBM Research Journal, 3 (7): 282–287.Google Scholar
Friedman, G. (1956), ‘Selective Feedback Computers for Engineering Synthesis and Nervous System Analogy’, Master's thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Fogel, L., Owens, A., and Walsh, M. (1966), Artificial Intelligence Through Simulated Evolution, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Foster, J. (1997), ‘The Analytical Foundations of Evolutionary Economics: From Biological Analogy to Economic Self-Organization’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8 (4): 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, J. (2000), ‘Competitive Selection, Self-Organisation and Joseph A. Schumpeter’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10 (3): 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenken, K. (2006a), ‘Technological Innovation and Complexity Theory’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15 (2): 137–155.Google Scholar
Frenken, K. (2006b), Innovation, Evolution and Complexity Theory, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Geisendorf, S. (2009), ‘The Economic Concept of Evolution: Self-organization or Universal Darwinism?’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 16 (4): 377–391.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971), The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haken, H. (2000), ‘Information and Self-Organization: A Macroscopic Approach to Complex Systems’, 2nd edn, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hanappi, H. and Elsner, W. (eds.) (2008), Advances in Evolutionary Institutional Economics: Evolutionary Mechanisms, Non-Knowledge, and Strategy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. H. (1977), ‘The Population Ecology of Organizations’, American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5): 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1948), Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1960), The Constitution of Liberty, London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1973), Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. I, Rules and Order, London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1988), The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure, and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2006), ‘The Nature and Units of Social Selection’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16 (5): 477–489.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2010), Darwin's Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holland, J. H. (1962), ‘Outline for a Logical Theory of Adaptive Systems’, JACM, 9: 297–314.Google Scholar
Holland, J. H. (1967), ‘Nonlinear Environments Permitting Efficient Adaptation’, in Tou, J. T. (ed.), Computer and Information Sciences II, Burlington, MA: Academic Press, pp. 147–164.Google Scholar
Holland, J. H. (1975), Adaption in Natural and Artificial Systems, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Holland, J. H. (1995), Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1988), Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M. J. (2005), Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karp, R. M. (1972), ‘Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems’, in Miller, R. E. and Thatcher, J. W. (eds.), Complexity of Computer Computations: Proceedings of a Symposia on the Complexity of Computer Computations, New York: Plenum, pp. 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, S. (1993), The Origins of Order, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. (1995), At Home in the Universe, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, C. and Caballero, G. (2009), ‘Comparing Theories of Institutional Change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5 (2): 151–180.Google Scholar
Klaes, M. (2004), ‘Ontological Issues in Evolutionary Economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11 (2): 121–124.Google Scholar
Koza, J. R. (1992), Genetic Programming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. (1969), Prometheus Unbound: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to Present, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landweber, L. F. and Winfree, E. (eds.) (2002), Evolution as Computation, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Amaral, L. A., Canning, D., Meyer, M., and Stanley, H. E. (1998), ‘Universal Features in the Growth of Complex Organizations’, Physical Review Letters, 81 (15): 3275–3278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, S. (1992), Artificial Life: The Quest for a New Creation, New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. A. (1985), ‘On Effectively Computable Realizations of Choice Functions’, Mathematical Social Sciences, 10 (1): 43–80.Google Scholar
Lindgren, K. and Nordahl, M. G. (1994), ‘Evolutionary Dynamics of Spatial Games’, Physica D, 75: 292–309.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (1989), More Heat Than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. (1996), An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1990), The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2000), ‘Natural History and Economic History: Is Technological Change an Evolutionary Process?’, Northwestern University Working Paper.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (2003), ‘Physical and Social Technologies and Their Evolution’, Columbia University Working Paper.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (2005), Technology, Institutions and Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (2006), ‘Evolutionary Social Science and Universal Darwinism’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16 (5): 491–510.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A. (2006), Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T. (1952), ‘Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm’, American Economic Review, 42 (5): 804–819.Google Scholar
Percus, A., Istrate, G., and Moore, C. (2006), Computational Complexity and Statistical Physics, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potts, J. (2000), The New Evolutionary Microeconomics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. (1976), Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, 3rd edn, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rechenberg, I. (1965), ‘Cybernatic Solution Path of an Experimental Problem’, Library Translation 1122, Farnborough: Royal Aircraft Establishment.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J. and Boyd, R. (2005), Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1990), ‘Endogenous Technological Change’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): S71–S102.Google Scholar
Safarzynska, K. and van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2010), ‘Evolutionary Models in Economics: A Survey of Methods and Building Blocks’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20 (3): 329–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödenger, E. (1944), What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. ([1934]1983), The Theory of Economic Development, London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1948), ‘A Mathematical Theory of Communications’, The Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423, 623–656.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1996), The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, M. H. R., Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Leschhorn, H., Maass, P., Salinger, M. A., and Stanley, H. E. (1996), ‘Scaling Behavior in the Growth of Companies’, Nature, 379: 804–806.Google Scholar
Stoelhorst, J. W. (2008), ‘The Explanatory Logic and Ontological Commitments of Generalized Darwinism’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 15 (4): 343–363.Google Scholar
Stolarz, P. (1992), ‘Recasting Deterministic Annealing as Constrained Optimisation’, Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 92-04-019.Google Scholar
Suh, N. P. (1990), The Principles of Design, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K. L. (eds.) (2006), Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent-Based Computational Economics, vol. 2, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Turing, A. M. (1936), ‘On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungs Problem’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society [Online], 42: 230–265, available at Com Lab: http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/activities/ieg/e-library/sources/tp2-ie.pdf (accessed 11 February 2010).Google Scholar
Vedral, V. (2010), Decoding Reality: The Universe as Quantum Information, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vellupillai, K. V. (2005), Computability, Complexity, and Constructability in Economic Analysis, London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vincenti, W. G. (1994), ‘The Retractable Airplane Landing Gear and the Northrop “Anomaly”: Variation-Selection and the Shaping of Technology’, Technology and Culture, 35 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J. ([1966]2002), Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata, 2002 edn, UMI reprint, Burks, A. W. (ed.), Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Weise, P. (1996), ‘Evolution and Self-Organization’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152: 716–722.Google Scholar
Whitley, L. D. (ed.) (1993), Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 2, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Wiggins, R. R. and Ruefli, T. W. (2002), ‘Sustained Competitive Advantage: Temporal Dynamics and the Incidence and Persistence of Superior Economic Performance’, Organization Science, 13 (1): 81–105.Google Scholar
Wiggins, R. R. and Ruefli, T. W. (2005), ‘Schumpeter's Ghost: Is Hypercompetition Making the Best of Times Shorter?’, Strategic Management Journal, 26 (10): 887–911.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (3): 595–613.Google Scholar
Witt, U. (1992), Explaining Process and Change: Approaches to Evolutionary Economics, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Witt, U. (1997), ‘Self-Organization and Economics – ‘What's New?’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8 (4): 489–507.Google Scholar
Witt, U. (2003), The Evolving Economy: Essays on the Evolutionary Approach to Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Witt, U. (2004), ‘On the Proper Interpretation of ‘Evolution’ in Economics and its Implications for Production Theory’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11 (2): 125–126.Google Scholar
Witt, U. (2008), ‘Observational Learning, Group Selection, and Societal Evolution’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 4 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1932), ‘The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding and Selection in Evolution’, Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics, 1: 356–366.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. (2000), Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar