Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-30T17:57:21.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The (proper) microfoundations of routines and capabilities: a response to Winter, Pentland, Hodgson and Knudsen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2011

TEPPO FELIN  and
NICOLAI J. FOSS
TEPPO FELIN*
Affiliation:
Organizational Leadership and Strategy, Marriott School, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
NICOLAI J. FOSS*
Affiliation:
Department of Strategic Management and Globalization, Copenhagen Business School, Kilevej 14, 2 fl., 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark and Department of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Breiviksveien 40, N-5045, Bergen, Norway
*
*Email: teppo.felin@byu.edu
**Email: njf.smg@cbs.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Sidney Winter (2011), Brian Pentland (2011), and Geoffrey Hodgson and Thorbjørn Knudsen (2011) take issue with the arguments in Teppo Felin and Nicolai J. Foss (2011), along with more generally critiquing the ‘microfoundations project’ related to routines and capabilities. In this rejoinder we argue that the responses of our critics reinforce a number of the points stated in our writings on the routines and capabilities literature. In response to their many points we address the following key issues in the debate: (1) lack of construct clarity; (2) universal mechanisms or comparative chauvinism; (3) models of mind and man; (4) levels of analysis; (5) agency and uncaused causes; and then further discuss (6) a rationalist alternative.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 271 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abell, P., Felin, T., and Foss, N. J. (2008), ‘Building Microfoundations for the Routines, Capabilities and Performance Link’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 29 (6): 489–502.Google Scholar
Agassi, J. (1975), ‘Institutional Individualism’, British Journal of Sociology, 26 (2): 144–155.Google Scholar
Aldrich, H., Hodgson, G. M., Hull, D. J., Knudsen, T., Mokyr, J., and Vanberg, V. (2008), ‘In Defence of Generalized Darwinism’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18 (5): 577–596.Google Scholar
Archer, M. (1995), Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. (2004), ‘Organizational Routines: A Review of the Literature’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13 (4): 643–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, M. (1990), ‘The Unsatisfactoriness of Satisficing: From Bounded Rationality to Innovative Rationality’, Review of Political Economy, 2 (2): 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B. (2004), Hayek's Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. and Morris, C. (1969), Foundations of the Unity of Science, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Casson, M. (1996), ‘Economics and Anthropology – Reluctant Partners’, Human Relations, 49 (9): 1151–1180.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959), ‘A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior’, Language, 35 (1): 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2003) [1966]), Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, Christchurch, New Zealand: Cybereditions Corp.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1986), Individual Interests and Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (1969 [1840]), The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, H. (2005), Herbert A. Simon: The Bounds of Reason in Modern America, Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm [Reprint], Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. and Martin, J. A. (2000), ‘Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?’, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10/11): 1105–1121.Google Scholar
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2005), ‘Strategic Organization: A Field in Search of Microfoundations’, Strategic Organization, 3 (4): 441–455.Google Scholar
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2009), ‘Organizational Routines: Historical Drift, a Course-Correction, and Prospects for Future Work’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25 (2): 157–167.Google Scholar
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2011), ‘The Endogenous Origins of Experience, Routines and Organizational Capabilities: The Poverty of Stimulus’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7 (2): 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Zenger, T. R. (2009), ‘Entrepreneurs as Theorists: On the Origins of Collective Beliefs and Novel Strategies’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3 (2): 127–146.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. and Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2010), What Darwin Got Wrong, London: Picador.Google Scholar
Gavetti, G. and Levinthal, D. (2000), ‘Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experimental Search’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (1): 113–137.Google Scholar
Grandori, A. (2010), ‘A Rational Heuristic Model of Economic Decision Making’, Rationality and Society, 22 (4): 477–504.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1952), The Counter-Revolution of Science [Reprint], Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2010), Darwin's Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2011), ‘Poverty of Stimulus and the Absence of Cause: Some Questions for Felin and Foss’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7 (2): 295–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1994), ‘The Nature of Man’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7 (2): 4–19.Google Scholar
King, B. G., Felin, T., and Whetten, D. A. (2010), ‘Finding the Organization in Organization Theory. A Meta-Theory of the Organization as a Social Actor’, Organization Science, 21 (1): 290–305.Google Scholar
Langlois, R. N. and Csontos, L. (1993), ‘Optimization, Rule-Following, and the Methodology of Situational Analysis’, in Mäki, U., Gustafsson, B., and Knudsen, C. (eds.), Rationality, Institutions, and Economic Methodology, London: Routledge, pp. 57–80.Google Scholar
Latsis, S. J. (1983), ‘The Role and Status of the Rationality Principle in the Social Sciences’, in Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Epistemology, Methodology and the Social Sciences, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leijonhufvud, A. (1976), ‘Schools, Revolutions, and Scientific Research Programmes in Economics’, In Lakatos, I. (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–108.Google Scholar
Levitt, B. and March, J. G. (1988), ‘Organizational Learning’, Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–340.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1897), The Analysis of Sensations, Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlup, F. (1967), ‘Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral and Managerial’, American Economic Review, 57 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2005), Economic Foundations of Strategy, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. and Simon, H. A. (1958), Organization, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Murmann, J. P., Aldrich, H., Levinthal, D., and Winter, S. (2003), ‘Evolutionary Thought in Management and Organization Theory at the Beginning of the New Millennium’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12 (1): 22–40.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, G. and Rizzo, M. (1985), The Economics of Time and Ignorance, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T. (2011), ‘The Foundation is Solid, if You Know Where to Look: Comment on Felin and Foss’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7 (2): 279–293.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. L., Boerner, C. S., and Teece, D. J. (2008), ‘Dynamic Capabilities, Competence and the Behavioral Theory of the Firm’, In Teece, D. J. (ed.), Technological Know-How, Organizational Capabilities, and Strategic Management, New Jersey: World Scientific, pp. 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1972), Objective Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. (2001), Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955), ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1): 99–118.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1969), The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R. (2010), ‘Editor's Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization’, The Academy of Management Review, 35 (3): 346–357.Google Scholar
Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997), ‘Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7): 509–533.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1999), ‘Strategy Research: Governance and Competence Perspectives’, Strategic Management Journal, 20 (12): 1087–1108.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (1964), ‘Economic Natural Selection and the Theory of the Firm’, Yale Economic Essays, 4 (1): 225–272.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (1987), ‘Natural Selection and Evolution’, in Eatwell, H., Milgate, M., and Newman, P. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan, pp. 614–617.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2003), ‘Understanding Dynamic Capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10): 991–995.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2011), ‘Problems at the Foundation? Comments on Felin and Foss’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7 (2): 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar