Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T03:04:08.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Structure of Wuchereria bancrofti Adults from India, with a Note on Male Specimens from British Guiana and Fiji

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

J. J. C. Buckley  and
S. N. Singh
J. J. C. Buckley
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
S. N. Singh
Affiliation:
Osmania University, Hyderabad-Deccan, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present study of the morphology of a few specimens of W. bancrofti from India reveals no significant differences from previous published descriptions, with the exception of those of Maplestone (1929) and Maplestone & Rao (1939), which were also concerned with Indian specimens. In the writers' opinion, the male tail does not possess caudal alae supported by pedunculated papillae; moreover the grouping of the papillae in the Indian specimens follows the pattern originally outlined by Leiper (1913), and not the conjectured pattern of Maplestone (1929, 1939). The present description confirms that (1) there are 8 circumoral papillae forming 2 circles, an inner and an outer of 4 each, and that there are 2 lateral amphids; (2) there is an unpaired papilla immediately anterior to the cloacal aperture in the male; (3) There are cuticular striations in the male on the ventral surface only, anterior to the cloacal apertur; (4) there is a subterminal triangular piece, heavily cuticularised, at the distal end of the right spicule; (5) the female tail bears numerous minute cuticular bosses and on the left side, posterior to the anus, there is a single phasmid.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 39 , Issue 2-3 , June 1965 , pp. 127 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buckley, J. J. C., 1952.—“Filariasis in Fiji: addendum.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 46, 321–324.Google Scholar
Buckley, J. J. C., 1952a.—“Demonstrations of cuticular bosses in Wuchereria bancrofti.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 46, 374 (Demonstration).Google Scholar
Buckley, J. J. C., 1958.—“On a new genus, Brugia, for Wuchereria spp. of the malayi group.” Proc. 6th Int. Congr. trop. Med. Mal.,Lisbon, 2, 385–391.Google Scholar
Buckley, J. J. C. and Edeson, J. F. B., 1956.—“On the adult morphology of Wuchereria sp. (malayi?) from a monkey (Macaca irus) and from cats in Malaya, and on Wuchereria pahangi n.sp. from a dog and a cat.” J. Helminth., 30, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fain, A., 1951.—“Étude morphologique des formes parentales de Wuchereria bancrofti (Cobbold, 1877) récoltées au Congo Beige.” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 26, 228–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1913.—“Observations on certain helminths of man.” Trans. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 6, 265–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maplestone, P. A., 1929.—“A re-description of Wuchereria bancrofti (Cobbold, 1877) with special reference to the tail of the male.” Ind. J. Med. Res., 16, 683–686.Google Scholar
Maplestone, P. A. and Rao, S. S., 1939.—“The tail of the male of Wuchereria bancrofti.” Rec. Ind. Mus., 41, 35–36.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. S., 1965.—“Filarial infections as zoonoses.” J. Helminth., 39, 229–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacher, J. F., 1962.—“Developmental stages of Brugia pahangi in the final host.” J. Parasit., 48, 693–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed