Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-rz4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-26T22:09:37.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Emergence of Two First-Person Plural Pronouns in Haredi Jerusalemite Yiddish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2010

Dalit Assouline
Dalit Assouline*
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
*
Scholion – Interdisciplinary Center in Jewish Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Rabin Building, Mount Scopus, The Mandel Institute of Jewish Studies, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel, [dalitassouline@gmail.com]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the rise of a new distinction in the first-person plural pronouns in Jerusalemite Yiddish, a contemporary dialect of Yiddish spoken in Israel by ultra-orthodox (Haredi) Jews. The distinction is semantically-pragmatically motivated, where a particular pronoun is used to refer to a specific subgroup of “us” compared with “them.” This innovation evolved as a result of both dialect contact and of the special sociolinguistic characteristics of the Haredi community in Israel. A rare phenomenon in the languages of the world, it reflects the unique self-imposed seclusion that is the social reality of speakers of Haredi Yiddish.*

Information

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Assouline, Dalit. Forthcoming. “They had not changed their language”-Haredi Yiddish in Israel. Haredi society: From survival to establishment, ed. by Kaplan, Kimi & Stadler, Nurit. Jerusalem: Van Leer. [in Hebrew]Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2002. “We” rules: The impact of an inclusive/exclusive opposition on the paradigmatic structure of person marking. Pronouns-grammar and representation, ed. by Simon, Horst J., & Wiese, Heike, 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2005. A typology of honorific uses of clusivity. Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction (Typological studies in language. Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction), ed. by Filimonova, Elena, 213–230, Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glinert, Lewis, & Yosseph, Shilhav. 1991. Holy land, holy language: A study of an Ultraorthodox Jewish ideology. Language in Society 20. 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2002. Grammar and function of “we.” Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses, and cultures, ed. by Duszak, Anna, 31–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Marvin. 1965. The Yiddish language in northern Poland: Its geography and history. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Miriam. 1998. Yiddish in the orthodox communities of Jerusalem. Politics of Yiddish, ed. by Kerler, Dov-Ber, 85–96Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Miriam. 1999a. Haredi, Haymish, and Frim: Yiddish vitality and language choice in a transnational, multilingual community. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 138. 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, Miriam. 1999b. Contentious partners: Yiddish and Hebrew in Haredi Israel, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 138. 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapeliuk, Olga. 2004. Some special functions of the adnominal pronouns in neo-Semitic. Folia Orientalia 40. 7–22.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce. 1982. A note on “inclusive/exclusive” in sixteenth century Peru. International Journal of American Linguistics 48. 450–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter, & Ron, Harré. 1990. Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prilutski, Noyekh. 1924. Mame Loshn-Yidishe Shprakhvisnshaftlekhe Forarbetn (Yidishe dialektologishe forshungen, vol. 5). Warsaw: Kultur Lige.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Max. 1980. History of the Yiddish language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar