Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:49:39.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Merging low vowels in metropolitan French

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2015

JANINE BERNS
JANINE BERNS*
Affiliation:
Radboud University
*
Address for correspondence: Radboud University Nijmegen, Centre for Language Studies, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD NijmegenNetherlands e-mail: j.berns@let.ru.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prescriptive pronunciation manuals of French generally present a vocalic inventory with two low vowels: front [a] and back [ɑ]. At the same time, descriptive overviews of modern French note the tendency of the posterior vowel to merge with the anterior token, especially in unstressed position. The actual spread and conditioning factors of this alleged merger are nevertheless unknown: we are ignorant about the degree of neutralization, and it is not clear whether it is a change affecting all regions and generations in France.

This article studies the French low vowels from a sociolinguistic perspective, by analyzing metropolitan French corpus data.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , November 2015 , pp. 317 - 338
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Berns, J. (2013). Velar variation in French. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 30: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. and Weenink, D.. (2013). Praat. Doing Phonetics by Computer. University of Amsterdam. (www.praat.org)Google Scholar
Brun, A. (1931). Le français de Marseille. Marseille: Institut Historique de Provence.Google Scholar
Detey, S., Durand, J., Laks, B. and Lyche, C. (eds). (2010). Les variétés du français parlé dans l’espace francophone. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Durand, J. (1995). Alternances vocaliques en français du midi et phonologie du gouvernement. Lingua, 95: 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, J. (2009). Essai de panorama critique des accents du Midi. In: Baronian, L. and Martineau, F. (eds), Le français d’un continent à l’autre: Mélanges offerts à Yves Charles Morin. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval, pp. 123–170.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Laks, B. and Lyche, C. (2002). La phonologie du français contemporain: usages, variétés et structure. In: Pusch, C. and Raible, W. (eds), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik – Korpora und Gesprochene Sprache/Romance Corpus Linguistics – Corpora and Spoken Language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Laks, B. and Lyche, C. (2005). Un corpus numérisé pour la phonologie du français. In: Williams, G. (ed.), La Linguistique de Corpus. Actes du Colloque ‘La linguistique de Corpus’, Lorient, 12–14 septembre 2002. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, pp. 205–217.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Laks, B. and Lyche, C. (2009). Le projet PFC: une source de données primaires structurées. In: Durand, J., Laks, B. and Lyche, C. (eds), Phonologie, Variation et Accents du Français. Paris: Hermès, pp. 19–61.Google Scholar
Durand, J. and Lyche, C. (2004). Structure et variation dans quelques systèmes vocaliques du français: l’enquête Phonologie du français contemporain (PFC). In: Coveney, A. and Sanders, C. (eds), Variation et Francophonie. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 217–240.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Slater, C. and Wise, H. (1987). Observations on schwa in Southern French. Linguistics, 25: 983–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, Y. (2006). Dynamique et changement. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Grammont, M. (1922). Traité pratique de prononciation française. Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Hansen, A. B. and Juillard, C. (2011). La phonologie parisienne à trente ans d’intervalle – Les voyelles à double timbre. Journal of French Language Studies, 21: 313–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J. (2010). Phonetic Analysis of Speech Corpora. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume I: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lennig, M. (1978). Acoustic measurement of linguistic change. The modern Paris vowel system. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Léon, P. (1966). Prononciation du français standard. Aide-mémoire d’orthoépie. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Léon, P. (1992). Phonétisme et prononciations du français. Paris: Editions Nathan.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. and Walter, H. (1973). Dictionnaire de la prononciation française dans son usage réel. Paris: France-Expansion.Google Scholar
Nguyen, N. and Fagyal, Z. (2007). Acoustic aspects of vowel harmony in French. Journal of Phonetics, 36: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pustka, E. (2007). Phonologie et variétés en contact: Aveyronnais et Guadeloupéens à Paris. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Rietveld, A. C. M. and van Heuven, V. J. (2001). Algemene fonetiek. Bussum: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Tranel, B. (1987). The Sounds of French. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traunmüller, H. (1990). Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88.1: 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdman, A. 1982. Français standard et français populaire. The French Review, 56.2: 218–227.Google Scholar
Walter, H. (1977). La phonologie du français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Walter, H. (1988). Le français dans tous les sens. Paris: Editions Robert Laffont.Google Scholar