Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T16:17:04.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turbulent channel flow of suspensions of neutrally buoyant particles over porous media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2022

Parisa Mirbod Open the ORCID record for Parisa Mirbod [Opens in a new window] ,
Seyedmehdi Abtahi ,
Abbas Moradi Bilondi Open the ORCID record for Abbas Moradi Bilondi [Opens in a new window] ,
Marco Edoardo Rosti Open the ORCID record for Marco Edoardo Rosti [Opens in a new window]  and
Luca Brandt Open the ORCID record for Luca Brandt [Opens in a new window]
Parisa Mirbod*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
Seyedmehdi Abtahi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
Abbas Moradi Bilondi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
Marco Edoardo Rosti
Affiliation:
Complex Fluids and Flows Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan
Luca Brandt
Affiliation:
FLOW, Department of Engineering Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
*
†Email address for correspondence: pmirbod@uic.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study discusses turbulent suspension flows of non-Brownian, non-colloidal, neutrally buoyant and rigid spherical particles in a Newtonian fluid over porous media with particles too large to penetrate and move through the porous layer. We consider suspension flows with the solid volume fraction ${{\varPhi _b}}$ ranging from 0 to 0.2, and different wall permeabilities, while porosity is constant at 0.6. Direct numerical simulations with an immersed boundary method are employed to resolve the particles and flow phase, with the volume-averaged Navier–Stokes equations modelling the flow within the porous layer. The results show that in the presence of particles in the free-flow region, the mean velocity and the concentration profiles are altered with increasing porous layer permeability because of the variations in the slip velocity and wall-normal fluctuations at the suspension-porous interface. Furthermore, we show that variations in the stress condition at the interface significantly affect the particle near-wall dynamics and migration toward the channel core, thereby inducing large modulations of the overall flow drag. At the highest volume fraction investigated here, ${{\varPhi _b}}= 0.2$, the velocity fluctuations and the Reynolds shear stress are found to decrease, and the overall drag increases due to the increase in the particle-induced stresses.

JFM classification

Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Particle/fluid flow Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 954 , 10 January 2023 , A8
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Alazmi, B. & Vafai, K. 2001 Analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer interfacial conditions between a porous medium and a fluid layer. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 44 (9), 1735–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alghalibi, D., Rosti, M.E. & Brandt, L. 2019 Inertial migration of a deformable particle in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (10), 104201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardekani, M.N., Al Asmar, L., Picano, F. & Brandt, L. 2018 Numerical study of heat transfer in laminar and turbulent pipe flow with finite-size spherical particles. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 71, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardekani, M.N. & Brandt, L. 2019 Turbulence modulation in channel flow of finite-size spheroidal particles. J. Fluid Mech. 859, 887–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardekani, M.N., Costa, P., Breugem, W.P. & Brandt, L. 2016 Numerical study of the sedimentation of spheroidal particles. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 87, 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardekani, M.N., Costa, P., Breugem, W.-P., Picano, F. & Brandt, L. 2017 Drag reduction in turbulent channel flow laden with finite-size oblate spheroids. J. Fluid Mech. 816, 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardekani, M.N., Rosti, M.E. & Brandt, L. 2019 Turbulent flow of finite-size spherical particles in channels with viscous hyper-elastic walls. J. Fluid Mech. 873, 410–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagheri, M., Kang, C. & Mirbod, P. 2019 Suspension flows in a pipe covered with permeable surfaces. In APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstract no. NP05.020.Google Scholar
Bagheri, M. & Mirbod, P. 2022 Effect of porous media models on rheological properties of suspensions. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 307, 104876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagheri, M., Moradi Bilondi, A., Taheri, E., Anand, A., Schatz, M.F. & Mirbod, P. 2022 An experimental analysis of flow transitions in a periodically grooved channel. In APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstract no. J32.00009.Google Scholar
Bear, J. 1988 Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
Beavers, G.S. & Joseph, D.D. 1967 Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall. J. Fluid Mech. 30 (1), 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A., Musacchio, S. & Toschi, F. 2007 Heavy particle concentration in turbulence at dissipative and inertial scales. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (8), 084502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellani, G., Byron, M.L., Collignon, A.G., Meyer, C.R. & Variano, E.A. 2012 Shape effects on turbulent modulation by large nearly neutrally buoyant particles. J. Fluid Mech. 712, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biegert, E., Vowinckel, B. & Meiburg, E. 2017 A collision model for grain-resolving simulations of flows over dense, mobile, polydisperse granular sediment beds. J. Comput. Phys. 340, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, H. 1961 The slow motion of a sphere through a viscous fluid towards a plane surface. Chem. Engng Sci. 16 (3–4), 242–251.Google Scholar
Breugem, W.-P. 2012 A second-order accurate immersed boundary method for fully resolved simulations of particle-laden flows. J. Comput. Phys. 231 (13), 4469–4498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breugem, W.-P. & Boersma, B.-J. 2005 Direct numerical simulations of turbulent flow over a permeable wall using a direct and a continuum approach. Phys. Fluids 17 (2), 025103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breugem, W.P., Boersma, B.J. & Uittenbogaard, R.E. 2004 Direct numerical simulations of plane channel flow over a 3D Cartesian grid of cubes. In Proc. Intl Conf. on Applications of Porous Media (ed. A.H. Reis & A.F. Miguel), pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Breugem, W.P., Boersma, B.J. & Uittenbogaard, R.E. 2006 The influence of wall permeability on turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 562, 35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkman, H.C. 1947 Fluid flow in a porous medium. Appl. Sci. Res. A 27 (143149), 42.Google Scholar
Carotenuto, C. & Minale, M. 2011 Shear flow over a porous layer: velocity in the real proximity of the interface via rheological tests. Phys. Fluids 23 (6), 063101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandesris, M. & Jamet, D. 2006 Boundary conditions at a planar fluid–porous interface for a Poiseuille flow. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 49 (13–14), 2137–2150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandesris, M. & Jamet, D. 2007 Boundary conditions at a fluid–porous interface: an a priori estimation of the stress jump coefficients. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 50 (17–18), 3422–3436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., Wang, J. & Yang, K. 2016 Analysis of the momentum transport boundary conditions at a fluid-porous interface. In Heat Transfer Summer Conference, vol. 50329, p. V001T03A006. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.Google Scholar
Costa, P., Boersma, B.J., Westerweel, J. & Breugem, W.-P. 2015 Collision model for fully resolved simulations of flows laden with finite-size particles. Phys. Rev. E 92 (5), 053012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P., Picano, F., Brandt, L. & Breugem, W.-P. 2016 Universal scaling laws for dense particle suspensions in turbulent wall-bounded flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (13), 134501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P., Picano, F., Brandt, L. & Breugem, W.-P. 2018 Effects of the finite particle size in turbulent wall-bounded flows of dense suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 843, 450–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, H.P.G. 1856 Les Fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon. Exposition et application des principes à suivre et des formules à employer dans les questions de distribution d'eau, etc.. V. Dalamont.Google Scholar
Deng, C. & Martinez, D.M. 2005 Viscous flow in a channel partially filled with a porous medium and with wall suction. Chem. Engng Sci. 60 (2), 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francesco Lucci, A.F. & Elghobashi, S. 2010 Modulation of isotropic turbulence by particles of Taylor length-scale size. J. Fluid Mech. 650, 5–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, T. 1997 Derivation of the Forchheimer law via matched asymptotic expansions. Transp. Porous Media 29 (2), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-de Segura, G., Sharma, A. & García-Mayoral, R. 2017 Turbulent drag reduction by anisotropic permeable coatings. In 10th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena – TSFP10.Google Scholar
Goyeau, B., Lhuillier, D., Gobin, D. & Velarde, M.G. 2003 Momentum transport at a fluid–porous interface. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 46 (21), 4071–4081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffner, E., Kang, C., Shapley, N. & Mirbod, P. 2019 Experimental and numerical studies of particle-laden fluid flows over a porous media model. In APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstract no. B04.005.Google Scholar
Haffner, E.A. & Mirbod, P. 2020 Velocity measurements of dilute particulate suspension over and through a porous medium model. Phys. Fluids 32 (8), 083608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, S., Je, J. & Choi, H. 2002 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow with permeable walls. J. Fluid Mech. 450, 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herwig, A., Kempe, T. & Fröhlich, J. 2011 Phase resolved DNS of the turbulent flow over a sediment bed and analysis of the erosion process. Proc. Appl. Maths Mech. 11 (1), 611–612.Google Scholar
Hooshyar, S., Yoshikawa, H.N. & Mirbod, P. 2022 The impact of imposed Couette flow on the stability of pressure-driven flows over porous surfaces. J. Engng Maths 132 (1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoh, M., Tamano, S., Iguchi, R., Yokota, K., Akino, N., Hino, R. & Kubo, S. 2006 Turbulent drag reduction by the seal fur surface. Phys. Fluids 18 (6), 065102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izbassarov, D., Rosti, M.E., Ardekani, M.N., Sarabian, M., Hormozi, S., Brandt, L. & Tammisola, O. 2018 Computational modeling of multiphase viscoelastic and elastoviscoplastic flows. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 88 (12), 521–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, R., Tschisgale, S. & Fröhlich, J. 2020 Effect of particle shape on bedload sediment transport in case of small particle loading. Meccanica 55 (2), 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, R., Tschisgale, S. & Fröhlich, J. 2021 Impact of shape: DNS of sediment transport with non-spherical particles. J. Fluid Mech. 916, A38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimenez, J., Uhlmann, M., Pinelli, A. & Kawahara, G. 2001 Turbulent shear flow over active and passive porous surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 442, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, D.D., Nield, D.A. & Papanicolaou, G. 1982 Nonlinear equation governing flow in a saturated porous medium. Water Resour. Res. 18 (4), 1049–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, C. & Mirbod, P. 2019 Porosity effects in laminar fluid flow near permeable surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 100 (1), 013109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, C. & Mirbod, P. 2021 Pressure-driven pipe flow of semi-dilute and dense suspensions over permeable surfaces. Rheol. Acta 60 (11), 711–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempe, T., Vowinckel, B. & Fröhlich, J. 2014 On the relevance of collision modeling for interface-resolving simulations of sediment transport in open channel flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 58, 214–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidanemariam, A.G., Chan-Braun, C., Doychev, T. & Uhlmann, M. 2013 Direct numerical simulation of horizontal open channel flow with finite-size, heavy particles at low solid volume fraction. New J. Phys. 15 (2), 025031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidanemariam, A.G. & Uhlmann, M. 2014 Direct numerical simulation of pattern formation in subaqueous sediment. J. Fluid Mech. 750, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köllner, T., Meredith, A., Nokes, R. & Meiburg, E. 2020 Gravity currents over fixed beds of monodisperse spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 901, A32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, F. & Schetz, J. 1982 Turbulent boundary layer over porous surfaces with different surface geometries. In 20th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, p. 30.Google Scholar
Kuwata, Y. & Suga, K. 2016 Lattice Boltzmann direct numerical simulation of interface turbulence over porous and rough walls. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 61, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuwata, Y. & Suga, K. 2017 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence over anisotropic porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 831, 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lage, J. 1998 The fundamental theory of flow through permeable media from Darcy to turbulence. Transp. Phenom. Porous Media 1.Google Scholar
Lashgari, I., Picano, F., Breugem, W.-P. & Brandt, L. 2014 Laminar, turbulent, and inertial shear-thickening regimes in channel flow of neutrally buoyant particle suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (25), 254502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lashgari, I., Picano, F., Costa, P., Breugem, W.-P. & Brandt, L. 2017 Turbulent channel flow of a dense binary mixture of rigid particles. J. Fluid Mech. 818, 623–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loisel, V., Abbas, M., Masbernat, O. & Climent, E. 2013 The effect of neutrally buoyant finite-size particles on channel flows in the laminar–turbulent transition regime. Phys. Fluids 25 (12), 123304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matas, J.-P., Morris, J.F. & Guazzelli, É. 2004 Inertial migration of rigid spherical particles in Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 515, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Min, J.Y. & Kim, S.J. 2005 A novel methodology for thermal analysis of a composite system consisting of a porous medium and an adjacent fluid layer. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 127 (6), 648–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minale, M. 2014 a Momentum transfer within a porous medium. I. Theoretical derivation of the momentum balance on the solid skeleton. Phys. Fluids 26, 123101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minale, M. 2014 b Momentum transfer within a porous medium. II. Stress boundary condition. Phys. Fluids 26, 123102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirbod, P., Andreopoulos, Y. & Weinbaum, S. 2009 On the generation of lift forces in random soft porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 619, 147–166.Google Scholar
Mirbod, P. & Shapley, N.C. 2022 Particle migration of suspensions in a pressure-driven flow over and through a porous structure. J. Rheol. arXiv:2212.02550.Google Scholar
Mirbod, P., Wu, Z. & Ahmadi, G. 2017 Laminar flow drag reduction on soft porous media. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittal, R. & Iaccarino, G. 2005 Immersed boundary methods. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moradi Bilondi, A., Mastroianni, N., Brandt, L. & Mirbod, P. 2022 Turbulent flow of polymer solutions in a square duct roughened with transverse ribs. In APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstract no. S01.0020.Google Scholar
Neale, G. & Nader, W. 1974 Practical significance of Brinkman's extension of Darcy's law: coupled parallel flows within a channel and a bounding porous medium. Can. J. Chem. Engng 52 (4), 475–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochoa-Tapia, J.A. & Whitaker, S. 1995 Momentum transfer at the boundary between a porous medium and a homogeneous fluid – I. Theoretical development. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 38 (14), 2635–2646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y. & Banerjee, S. 1996 Numerical simulation of particle interactions with wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 8 (10), 2733–2755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, K., Nikora, V., Vowinckel, B., Cameron, S., Jain, R., Stewart, M., Gibbins, C. & Fröhlich, J. 2020 Double-averaged kinetic energy budgets in flows over mobile granular beds: insights from DNS data analysis. J. Hydraul. Res. 58 (4), 653–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, C., Ayala, O.M. & Wang, L.-P. 2019 A direct numerical investigation of two-way interactions in a particle-laden turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 875, 1096–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, C. & Wang, L.-P. 2020 Force-amplified, single-sided diffused-interface immersed boundary kernel for correct local velocity gradient computation and accurate no-slip boundary enforcement. Phys. Rev. E 101 (5), 053305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perot, B. & Moin, P. 1995 Shear-free turbulent boundary layers. Part 1. Physical insights into near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 295, 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskin, C.S. 1972 Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J. Comput. Phys. 10 (2), 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picano, F., Breugem, W.-P. & Brandt, L. 2015 Turbulent channel flow of dense suspensions of neutrally buoyant spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 764, 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintard, M. & Whitaker, S. 1994 Transport in ordered and disordered porous media II: generalized volume averaging. Transp. Porous Media 14 (2), 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeks, M.W. 1983 The transport of discrete particles in inhomogeneous turbulence. J. Aerosol. Sci. 14 (6), 729–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosti, M.E. & Brandt, L. 2017 Numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow over a viscous hyper-elastic wall. J. Fluid Mech. 830, 708–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosti, M.E. & Brandt, L. 2020 Increase of turbulent drag by polymers in particle suspensions. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 (4), 041301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosti, M.E., Brandt, L. & Pinelli, A. 2018 Turbulent channel flow over an anisotropic porous wall-drag increase and reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 842, 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosti, M.E., Cortelezzi, L. & Quadrio, M. 2015 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow over porous walls. J. Fluid Mech. 784, 396–442.Google Scholar
Rosti, M.E., Mirbod, P. & Brandt, L. 2021 The impact of porous walls on the rheology of suspensions. Chem. Engng Sci., 116178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosti, M.E., Pramanik, S., Brandt, L. & Mitra, D. 2020 The breakdown of Darcy's law in a soft porous material. Soft Matt. 16 (4), 939–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, J.F. & Gelhar, L.W. 1972 Turbulent shear flow in porous boundary. J. Engng Mech. ASCE 504 (98), 975.Google Scholar
Sardina, G., Schlatter, P., Brandt, L., Picano, F. & Casciola, C.M. 2012 Wall accumulation and spatial localization in particle-laden wall flows. J. Fluid Mech. 699 (1), 50–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, X., Wu, T. & Yu, Z. 2012 Fully resolved numerical simulation of particle-laden turbulent flow in a horizontal channel at a low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 693, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, W., Jinzhou, Z. & Yongming, L. 2014 Hydraulic fracturing simulation of complex fractures growth in naturally fractured shale gas reservoir. Arabian J. Sci. Engng 39 (10), 7411–7419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suga, K., Matsumura, Y., Ashitaka, Y., Tominaga, S. & Kaneda, M. 2010 Effects of wall permeability on turbulence. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 31 (6), 974–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suga, K., Nakagawa, Y. & Kaneda, M. 2017 Spanwise turbulence structure over permeable walls. J. Fluid Mech. 822, 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilton, N. & Cortelezzi, L. 2008 Linear stability analysis of pressure-driven flows in channels with porous walls. J. Fluid Mech. 604, 411–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toschi, F. & Bodenschatz, E. 2009 Lagrangian properties of particles in turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, M. 2005 An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows. J. Comput. Phys. 209 (2), 448–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vafai, K. & Kim, S.J. 1990 Fluid mechanics of the interface region between a porous medium and a fluid layer – an exact solution. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 11 (3), 254–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vafai, K. & Thiyagaraja, R. 1987 Analysis of flow and heat transfer at the interface region of a porous medium. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 30 (7), 1391–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés-Parada, F.J., Aguilar-Madera, C.G., Ochoa-Tapia, J.A. & Goyeau, B. 2013 Velocity and stress jump conditions between a porous medium and a fluid. Adv. Water Resour. 62, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés-Parada, F.J., Alvarez-Ramírez, J., Goyeau, B. & Ochoa-Tapia, J.A. 2009 Computation of jump coefficients for momentum transfer between a porous medium and a fluid using a closed generalized transfer equation. Transp. Porous Media 78 (3), 439–457.Google Scholar
Valdés-Parada, F.J., Goyeau, B. & Ochoa-Tapia, J.A. 2007 Jump momentum boundary condition at a fluid–porous dividing surface: derivation of the closure problem. Chem. Engng Sci. 62 (15), 4025–4039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowinckel, B., Biegert, E., Luzzatto-Fegiz, P. & Meiburg, E. 2019 a Consolidation of freshly deposited cohesive and noncohesive sediment: particle-resolved simulations. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (7), 074305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowinckel, B., Biegert, E., Meiburg, E., Aussillous, P. & Guazzelli, É. 2021 Rheology of mobile sediment beds sheared by viscous, pressure-driven flows. J. Fluid Mech. 921, A20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowinckel, B., Kempe, T. & Fröhlich, J. 2014 Fluid–particle interaction in turbulent open channel flow with fully-resolved mobile beds. Adv. Water Resour. 72, 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowinckel, B., Nikora, V., Kempe, T. & Fröhlich, J. 2017 Momentum balance in flows over mobile granular beds: application of double-averaging methodology to DNS data. J. Hydraul. Res. 55 (2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowinckel, B., Withers, J., Luzzatto-Fegiz, P. & Meiburg, E. 2019 b Settling of cohesive sediment: particle-resolved simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 858, 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, S. 1969 Advances in theory of fluid motion in porous media. Ind. Engng Chem. 61 (12), 14–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, S. 1986 Flow in porous media I: a theoretical derivation of Darcy's law. Transp. Porous Media 1 (1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, S. 1996 The Forchheimer equation: a theoretical development. Transp. Porous Media 25 (1), 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z. & Mirbod, P. 2018 Experimental analysis of the flow near the boundary of random porous media. Phys. Fluids 30 (4), 047103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z. & Mirbod, P. 2019 Instability analysis of the flow between two parallel plates where the bottom one coated with porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 130, 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, K., Dong, S., Climent, E. & Maxey, M.R. 2010 Modulation of homogeneous turbulence seeded with finite size bubbles or particles. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 36 (3), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, K. & Maxey, M.R. 2010 Dynamics of concentrated suspensions of non-colloidal particles in Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 649, 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousefi, A., Ardekani, M.N., Picano, F. & Brandt, L. 2021 Regimes of heat transfer in finite-size particle suspensions. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 177, 121514.Google Scholar
Yu, Z., Wu, T., Shao, X. & Lin, J. 2013 Numerical studies of the effects of large neutrally buoyant particles on the flow instability and transition to turbulence in pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 25 (4), 043305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zade, S., Costa, P., Fornari, W., Lundell, F. & Brandt, L. 2018 Experimental investigation of turbulent suspensions of spherical particles in a square duct. J. Fluid Mech. 857, 748–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagni, A.F.E. & Smith, K.V.H. 1976 Channel flow over permeable beds of graded spheres. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 102 (2), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhai, Z., et al. 2005 A new approach to modeling hydraulic fractures in unconsolidated sands. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zippe, H.J. & Graf, W.H. 1983 Turbulent boundary-layer flow over permeable and non-permeable rough surfaces. J. Hydraul. Res. 21 (1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar