Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T03:35:20.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transient flow in a side-heated cavity at high Rayleigh number: a numerical study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

S. G. Schladow ,
J. C. Patterson  and
R. L. Street
S. G. Schladow
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–4020, USA
J. C. Patterson
Affiliation:
Center for Water Research, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
R. L. Street
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–4020, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of two- and three-dimensional numerical simulations of transient flow in a side-heated cavity has been conducted. The motivation for the work has been to resolve discrepancies between a flow description based on scaling arguments and one based on laboratory experiments, and to provide a more detailed description of the approach to steady state. All simulations were for a Rayleigh number of 2 × 109, and a water-filled cavity of aspect ratio 1. The simulations (beginning with an isothermal fluid at rest) generally agree with the results of the scaling arguments. In addition, the experimental observations are entirely accounted for by the position of the measurement instruments and the presence of an extremely weak, stabilizing temperature gradient in the vertical.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 200 , March 1989 , pp. 121 - 148
Copyright
© 1989 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K.: 1954 Heat transfer by free convection across a closed cavity between vertical boundaries at different temperatures. Q. Appl. Maths 12, 209–2233.Google Scholar
Elder, J. W.: 1965 Turbulent free convection in a vertical slot. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 99–111.Google Scholar
Freitas, C. J., Street, R. L., Findikakis, A. N. & Koseff, J. R., 1985 Numerical simulation of three-dimensional flow in a cavity. Intl J. Num. Methods Fluids 5, 561–575.Google Scholar
Gill, A. E.: 1966 The boundary layer regime for convection in a rectangular cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 515–536.Google Scholar
Gill, A. E. & Davey, A., 1969 Instabilities of a buoyancy-driven system. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 775–798.Google Scholar
Henderson, F. M.: 1966 Open Channel Flow. Macmillan. 522 pp.
Hurle, D. T. J., Jakeman, E. & Johnson, C. P., 1974 Convective temperature oscillations in molten gallium. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 565–576.Google Scholar
Ivey, G. N.: 1984 Experiments on transient natural convection in a cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 389–401.Google Scholar
Koseff, J. R. & Street, R. L., 1984 On end wall effects in a lid-driven cavity flow. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 106, 385–389.Google Scholar
Leonard, B. P.: 1979 A stable and accurate convective modeling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engng. 19, 59–98.Google Scholar
Mallinson, G. D. & De Vahl Davis, G. 1977 Three-dimensional natural convection in a box: a numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 1–31.Google Scholar
McGuirk, J. J., Taylor, A. M. K. P. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1982 The assessment of numerical diffusion in upwind difference calculations of turbulent recirculating flows. In Turbulent Shear Flows, vol. 3 (ed. L. J. S. Bradbury et al.). Springer.
Morton, B. R.: 1984 The generation and decay of vorticity. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 28, 277–308.Google Scholar
Ostrach, S. & Raghavan, C., 1979 Effect of stabilizing thermal gradients on natural convection in rectangular cavities. Trans. ASME C: J. Heat Transfer 101, 238–243.Google Scholar
Patankar, S. V.: 1980 Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill. 289 pp.
Patterson, J. C.: 1984 On the existence of an oscillatory approach to steady natural convection in cavities. Trans. ASME C: J. Heat Transfer 106, 104–108.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. C. & Imberger, J., 1980 Unsteady natural convection in a rectangular cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 100, 65–86.Google Scholar
Perng, C. Y. & Street, R. L., 1988 Three-dimensional unsteady flow simulations: alternative strategies for a volume-averaged calculation. Intl J. Num. Methods Fluids (in press).Google Scholar
Prasad, A. K., Perng, C. Y. & Koseff, J. R., 1988 Some observations on the influence of longitudinal vortices in a lid-driven cavity flow. AIAA/ASME/SIAM/APS 1st National Fluid Dynamics Congress July 25–28, 1988, Cincinnati, Ohio, pp. 288–295.Google Scholar
Tabaczynski, R. S., Hoult, D. P. & Keck, J. C., 1970 High Reynolds number flow in a moving corner. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 249–256.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S.: 1973 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge Universtiy press. 368 pp.
Van Doormaal, J. P. & Raithby, G. D. 1984 Enhancements of the SIMPLE Method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numer. Heat Transfer 7, 147–163.Google Scholar
Worster, M. G. & Leitch, A. M., 1985 Laminar free convection in confined regions. J. Fluid Mech. 156, 301–319.Google Scholar
Yewell, R., Poulikakos, D. & Bejan, A., 1982 Transient natural convection experiments in shallow enclosures. Trans. ASME C: J. Heat Transfer 104, 533–538.Google Scholar