Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T16:25:13.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the second-order solution to the Sears problem for compressible flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

R. K. Amiet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Significant simplifications and minor corrections are made to a previous second-order solution of Graham & Kullar for the lift on a flat-plate airfoil encountering a sinusoidal gust in compressible flow. The related cases of a skewed gust in incompressible flow, a parallel gust in compressible flow and the generalized case of a skewed gust in compressible flow are considered. In addition to the simplifications, the solutions are combined into a composite solution that is more accurate than the solutions from which it is composed, making it useful for numerical calculations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 254 , September 1993 , pp. 213 - 228
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adamczyk, J. J. 1974 The passage of an infinite swept airfoil through a swept gust. J. Aircraft 11, 281–287.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1974 Compressibility effects in unsteady thin-airfoil theory. AIAA J. 12, 252–255.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1975 Effects of compressibility in unsteady airfoil lift theories. In Unsteady Aerodynamics, Proc. Symp. on Unsteady Aerodynamics, March 18–20, University of Arizona (ed. R. B. Kinney), pp. 631–653.
Amiet, R. K. 1976a High frequency thin-airfoil theory for subsonic flow. AIAA J. 14, 1076–1082.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1976b Airfoil response to an incompressible skewed gust of small spanwise wavenumber. AIAA 14, 541–542.
Amiet, R. K. 1990 Gust response for flat-plate airfoils and the Kutta condition. AIAA J. 28, 1718–1727.Google Scholar
Graham, J. M. R. 1970a Lifting surface theory for an arbitrarily yawed sinusoidal gust incident on a thin airfoil in incompressible flow. Aeronaut. Q. 21, 182–198.Google Scholar
Graham, J. M. R. 1970b Similarity rules for thin airfoils in non-stationary subsonic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 43, 753–766.Google Scholar
Graham, J. M. R. & Kullar, I. 1977 Small perturbation expansions in unsteady airfoil theory. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 209–224.Google Scholar
Graham, J. M. R. & Kullar, I. 1978 Small perturbation expansion in unsteady airfoil theory. Imperial College Technical Note 78–102.
Kármán, T. von & Sears, W. R. 1938 Airfoil theory for non-uniform motion. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 5, 379–390.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1951 Quasi-stationary airfoil theory in subsonic compressible flow. Q. Appl. Math. 8, 351–358.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. 1973 Unsteady thin-airfoil theory for subsonic low. AIAA J. 11, 205–209.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. E., Runyan, H. I. & Woolston, D. S. 1955 On the kernel function of the integral equation relating the lift and downwash distributions of oscillating finite wings in subsonic flow. NACA Rep. 1234.