Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T14:32:03.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanisms of inkjet printing in a liquid environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2022

Dege Li Open the ORCID record for Dege Li [Opens in a new window] ,
Haoren Li ,
Guodong Yang ,
Yi Cao ,
Bingfang Huang ,
Xinlei Wu Open the ORCID record for Xinlei Wu [Opens in a new window] ,
Qiang Sun ,
Chi Ma ,
Yu Zhou  and
Yonghong Liu Open the ORCID record for Yonghong Liu [Opens in a new window]
...Show all authors
Dege Li
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
Haoren Li
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
Guodong Yang
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
Yi Cao
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
Bingfang Huang
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
Xinlei Wu
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
Qiang Sun
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
Chi Ma
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
Yu Zhou
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, PR China
Yonghong Liu*
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
Yanzhen Zhang*
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, PR China
*
†Email addresses for correspondence: liuyhupc@163.com, zhangyanzhen@upc.edu.cn
†Email addresses for correspondence: liuyhupc@163.com, zhangyanzhen@upc.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inkjet printing, originally invented for text and pattern printing, is now central to many industrial applications, such as printed electronics, flexible electronics, 3-D printing of mechanical and even biological devices. However, constrained by the droplets’ ejection mechanism, the accuracy of traditional inkjet printing is limited by the size of its orifice, and it is difficult to achieve a volume of droplets at the femtolitre scale, which hinders its further application in the above fields. To this end, we propose the confined interface vibration inkjet printing (CIVIJP) technique, which is capable of printing patterns in a liquid environment with droplet size much smaller than the orifice from which they are dispensed. Here, further systematic study of the mechanism of printing in a liquid environment was carried out with the assistance of a high-speed imaging technique. It is found for the first time that a single pulse stimulation applied on the piezo-ceramic of the inkjet nozzle can trigger damping oscillations of the oil/water interface confined by the orifice, which can last more than 500 $\mathrm {\mu }$s. By adjusting the intensity of single pulse stimulation, the size and quantity of the dispensed droplets can be controlled in a wide range, which is obviously different from traditional droplet ejection in a gaseous environment. This work reveals the underlying physics between the pulse stimulation and the interface behaviours, as well as the physics between the interface behaviours and the size and number of dispensed droplets, enriching the fundamental theory of the inkjet printing in liquid phase.

JFM classification

Micro-/Nano-fluid dynamics: Microfluidics Drops and Bubbles: Drops Drops and Bubbles: Breakup/coalescence

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 948 , 10 October 2022 , A40
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abdolmaleki, H., Kidmose, P. & Agarwala, S. 2021 Droplet-based techniques for printing of functional inks for flexible physical sensors. Adv. Mater. 33 (20), 2006792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashgriz, N. 2011 Handbook of Atomization and Sprays: Theory and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basaran, O.A. 2002 Small-scale free surface flows with breakup: drop formation and emerging applications. AIChE J. 48 (9), 1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basaran, O.A., Gao, H. & Bhat, P.P. 2013 Nonstandard inkjets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berggren, W.T., Westphall, M.S. & Smith, L.M. 2002 Single-pulse nanoelectrospray ionization. Analyt. Chem. 74 (14), 3443–3448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogy, D.B. & Talke, F.E. 1984 Experimental and theoretical study of wave propagation phenomena in drop-on-demand ink jet devices. IBM J. Res. Dev. 28 (3), 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, P. 2007 Printing cells. Science 318 (5848), 208–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, A.U. & Basaran, O.A. 2002 A new method for significantly reducing drop radius without reducing nozzle radius in drop-on-demand drop production. Phys. Fluids 14 (1), L1–L4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Liu, W., Dong, B., Lee, J., Ware, H.O.T., Zhang, H.F. & Sun, C. 2018 High-speed 3D printing of millimeter-size customized aspheric imaging lenses with sub 7 nm surface roughness. Adv. Mater. 30 (18), 1705683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, E., Ahmadi, A. & Cheung, K.C. 2015 Measurement of the oscillatory flow field inside tapered cylindrical inkjet nozzles using micro-particle image velocimetry. Microfluid Nanofluid 19 (3), 635–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derby, B. 2010 Inkjet printing of functional and structural materials: fluid property requirements, feature stability, and resolution. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 40, 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkink, R. & Ohl, C.-D. 2008 Laser-induced cavitation based micropump. Lab on a Chip 8 (10), 1676–1681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijksman, J.F. 1984 Hydrodynamics of small tubular pumps. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elrod, S.A., Hadimioglu, B., Khuri-Yakub, B.T., Rawson, E.G., Richley, E., Quate, C.F., Mansour, N.N. & Lundgren, T.S. 1989 Nozzleless droplet formation with focused acoustic beams. J. Appl. Phys. 65 (9), 3441–3447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erb, R.M., Obrist, D., Chen, P.W., Studer, J. & Studart, A.R. 2011 Predicting sizes of droplets made by microfluidic flow-induced dripping. Soft Matt. 7 (19), 8757–8761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoath, S.D. 2016 Fundamentals of Inkjet Printing: The Science of Inkjet and Droplets. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, H.H., Patankar, N.A. & Zhu, M.Y. 2001 Direct numerical simulations of fluid–solid systems using the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian technique. J. Comput. Phys. 169 (2), 427–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S.-H., Kim, S., Sohn, D.K. & Ko, H.S. 2020 Analysis of drop-on-demand piezo inkjet performance. Phys. Fluids 32 (2), 022007.Google Scholar
Kang, D., Park, J.A., Kim, W., Kim, S., Lee, H.-R., Kim, W.-J., Yoo, J.-Y. & Jung, S. 2021 All-inkjet-printed 3d alveolar barrier model with physiologically relevant microarchitecture. Adv. Sci. 8 (10), 2004990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, B.H., et al. 2015 High-resolution patterns of quantum dots formed by electrohydrodynamic jet printing for light-emitting diodes. Nano Lett. 15 (2), 969–973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, D., et al. 2021 Confined interface vibration for femtoliter droplets generation and manipulation. Nano Select 2 (2), 338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, S., Tao, Y., Du, W. & Wang, Y. 2018 Interfacial emulsification: an emerging monodisperse droplet generation method for microreactors and bioanalysis. Langmuir 34 (39), 11655–11666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y. & Derby, B. 2019 Experimental study of the parameters for stable drop-on-demand inkjet performance. Phys. Fluids 31 (3), 032004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., et al. 2019 Inkjet-printed unclonable quantum dot fluorescent anti-counterfeiting labels with artificial intelligence authentication. Nat. Commun. 10 (1), 2409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohse, D. 2022 Fundamental fluid dynamics challenges in inkjet printing. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54, 349–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlroy, C. & Harlen, O.G. 2019 Effects of drive amplitude on continuous jet break-up. Phys. Fluids 31 (6), 064104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meacham, J.M., Varady, M.J., Degertekin, F.L. & Fedorov, A.G. 2005 Droplet formation and ejection from a micromachined ultrasonic droplet generator: visualization and scaling. Phys. Fluids 17 (10), 100605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman, M. 1965 Sudden steam printer. US Patent 3, 179, 042.Google Scholar
Nield, D.A. & Kuznetsov, A.V. 2007 Forced convection with laminar pulsating flow in a channel or tube. Intl J. Therm. Sci. 46 (6), 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onses, M.S., Sutanto, E., Ferreira, P.M., Alleyne, A.G. & Rogers, J.A. 2015 Mechanisms, capabilities, and applications of high-resolution electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Small 11 (34), 4237–4266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J.-U., et al. 2007 High-resolution electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Nat. Mater. 6 (10), 782–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, S.-Y., Wu, T.-H., Chen, Y., Teitell, M.A. & Chiou, P.-Y. 2011 High-speed droplet generation on demand driven by pulse laser-induced cavitation. Lab on a Chip 11 (6), 1010–1012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, M., Haverinen, H.M., Dhagat, P. & Jabbour, G.E. 2010 Inkjet printing–process and its applications. Adv. Mater. 22 (6), 673–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Switzer, G.L. 1991 A versatile system for stable generation of uniform droplets. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62 (11), 2765–2771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Zhong, Y. & Fang, H. 2019 Deformation characteristics of a single droplet driven by a piezoelectric nozzle of the drop-on-demand inkjet system. J. Fluid Mech. 869, 634–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijshoff, H. 2008 Structure-and fluid-dynamics in piezo inkjet printheads. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wijshoff, H. 2010 The dynamics of the piezo inkjet printhead operation. Phys. Rep. 491 (4-5), 77–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Q. & Basaran, O.A. 2007 Computational analysis of drop-on-demand drop formation. Phys. Fluids 19 (10), 102111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yue, P., Feng, J.J., Liu, C. & Shen, J. 2004 A diffuse-interface method for simulating two-phase flows of complex fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 515, 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yue, P., Zhou, C., Feng, J.J., Ollivier-Gooch, C.F. & Hu, H.H. 2006 Phase-field simulations of interfacial dynamics in viscoelastic fluids using finite elements with adaptive meshing. J. Comput. Phys. 219 (1), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Li, D., Liu, Y. & Wittstock, G. 2018 a Inkjet printing in liquid environments. Small 14 (27), 1801212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y., Li, D., Liu, Y. & Wittstock, G. 2018 b Printing with satellite droplets. Small 14 (39), 1802583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y., Zhu, B., Liu, Y. & Wittstock, G. 2016 Hydrodynamic dispensing and electrical manipulation of attolitre droplets. Nat. Commun. 7 (1), 12424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, Y., Fang, H., Ma, Q. & Dong, X. 2018 Analysis of droplet stability after ejection from an inkjet nozzle. J. Fluid Mech. 845, 378–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, P. & Wang, L. 2017 Passive and active droplet generation with microfluidics: a review. Lab on a Chip 17 (1), 34–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoltan, S.I. 1972 Pulsed droplet ejecting system. US Patent 3, 683, 212.Google Scholar

Li et al. Supplementary Movie 1

The relationship between the interface vibration and the driving waveform.

Download Li et al. Supplementary Movie 1(Video)
Video 8.2 MB

Li et al. Supplementary Movie 2

Different interface behavior driven by the different waveforms in Figure 8.

Download Li et al. Supplementary Movie 2(Video)
Video 23.2 MB

Li et al. Supplementary Movie 3

Single big droplet dispensed by regulating the driving waveform.

Download Li et al. Supplementary Movie 3(Video)
Video 12.2 MB

Li et al. Supplementary Movie 4

Different droplet formation conditions triggered by a single waveform.

Download Li et al. Supplementary Movie 4(Video)
Video 27.1 MB