Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-5mwv9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-24T21:00:37.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lift and thrust generation by a butterfly-like flapping wing–body model: immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2015

Kosuke Suzuki ,
Keisuke Minami  and
Takaji Inamuro
Kosuke Suzuki
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan
Keisuke Minami
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan
Takaji Inamuro*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan Advanced Research Institute of Fluid Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan
*
†Email address for correspondence: inamuro@kuaero.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The flapping flight of tiny insects such as flies or larger insects such as butterflies is of fundamental interest not only in biology itself but also in its practical use for the development of micro air vehicles (MAVs). It is known that a butterfly flaps downward for generating the lift force and backward for generating the thrust force. In this study, we consider a simple butterfly-like flapping wing–body model in which the body is a thin rod and the rectangular rigid wings flap in a simple motion. We investigate lift and thrust generation of the model by using the immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann method. First, we compute the lift and thrust forces when the body of the model is fixed for Reynolds numbers in the range of 50–1000. In addition, we estimate the supportable mass for each Reynolds number from the computed lift force. Second, we simulate free flights when the body can only move translationally. It is found that the expected supportable mass can be supported even in the free flight except when the mass of the body relative to the mass of the fluid is too small, and the wing–body model with the mass of actual insects can go upward against the gravity. Finally, we simulate free flights when the body can move translationally and rotationally. It is found that the body has a large pitch motion and consequently gets off-balance. Then, we discuss a way to control the pitching angle by flexing the body of the wing–body model.

JFM classification

Aerodynamics: Aerodynamics Biological Fluid Dynamics: Swimming/flying
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 767 , 25 March 2015 , pp. 659 - 695
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aono, H., Liang, F. & Luo, H. 2008 Near- and far-field aerodynamics in insect hovering flight: an integrated computational study. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 239–257.Google Scholar
Bai, P., Cui, E., Zhou, W. & Chen, B. 2007 A new bionic MAV’s flapping motion based on fruit fly hovering at low Reynolds number. Acta Mechanica Sin. 23, 485–493.Google Scholar
Birch, J. M. & Dickinson, M. H. 2001 Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings. Nature 412, 729–733.Google Scholar
Birch, J. M., Dickson, W. B. & Dickinson, M. H. 2004 Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 1063–1072.Google Scholar
Dickinson, M. H., Lehman, F. O. & Sane, S. P. 1999 Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284, 1954–1960.Google Scholar
Dudley, R. 1990 Biomechanics of flight in neotropical butterflies: morphometrics and kinematics. J. Exp. Biol. 150, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, R. 2002 The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ellington, C. P. 1984 The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. I. The quasi-steady analysis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305, 1–15.Google Scholar
Ellington, C. P., van den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P. & Thomas, A. L. R. 1996 Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 384, 626–630.Google Scholar
Feng, Z.-G. & Michaelides, E. E. 2004 The immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann method for solving fluid-particles interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. 195, 602–628.Google Scholar
Feng, Z.-G. & Michaelides, E. E. 2005 Proteus: a direct forcing method in the simulations of particulate flows. J. Comput. Phys. 202, 20–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, T. & Lu, X. 2008 Insect normal hovering flight in ground effect. Phys. Fluids 20, 087101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmanov, A. & Sotiropoulos, F. 2005 A hybrid Cartesian/immersed boundary method for simulating flows with 3D, geometrically complex, moving bodies. J. Comput. Phys. 207, 457–492.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H., Poole, C. P. & Safko, J. L. 2002 Classical Mechanics, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Huang, H. & Sun, M. 2012 Forward flight of a model butterfly: simulation by equations of motion coupled with the Navier–Stokes equations. Acta Mechanica Sin. 28, 1590–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Wray, A. A. & Moin, P.1988 Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flow. In Proceedings of the Summer Program 1988, pp. 193–208.Google Scholar
Iima, M. & Yanagita, T. 2001 An analysis of a symmetric flapping model: a symmetry-breaking mechanism and its universality. Theor. Appl. Mech. 50, 237–245.Google Scholar
Inamuro, T. 2012 Lattice Boltzmann methods for moving boundary flows. Fluid Dyn. Res. 44, 024001.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Kim, D. & Choi, H. 2001 An immersed-boundary finite-volume method for simulations of flow in complex geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 171, 132–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Y., Suzuki, K. & Inamuro, T. 2014 Flight simulations of a two-dimensional flapping wing by the IB-LBM. Intl J. Mod. Phys. C 25, 1340020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, T., Varnik, F. & Raabe, D. 2011 Efficient and accurate simulations of deformable particles immersed in a fluid using a combined immersed boundary lattice Boltzmann finite element method. Comput. Maths Applics 61, 3485–3505.Google Scholar
Lentink, D. & Dickinson, M. H. 2009 Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 2705–2719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, H. 2009 Integrated modeling of insect flight: from morphology, kinematics to aerodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Ellington, C. P., Kawachi, K., van den Berg, C. & Willmott, A. P. 1998 A computational fluid dynamics study of hawkmoth hovering. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, H. & Kawachi, K. 1998 A numerical study of insect flight. J. Comput. Phys. 146, 124–156.Google Scholar
Ma, K. Y., Chirarattananon, P., Fuller, S. B. & Wood, R. J. 2013 Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science 340, 603–607.Google Scholar
Medina, A.2013 The aerodynamics of deforming wings at low Reynolds number. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Minami, K., Suzuki, K. & Inamuro, T. 2015 Free flight simulations of a dragonfly-like flapping wing–body model using the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method. Fluid Dyn. Res. 47, 015505.Google Scholar
Mittal, R. & Iaccarino, G. 2005 Immersed boundary methods. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 239–261.Google Scholar
Nakata, T. & Liu, H. 2012 A fluid–structure interaction model of insect flight with flexible wings. J. Comput. Phys. 231, 1822–1847.Google Scholar
Ota, K., Suzuki, K. & Inamuro, T. 2012 Lift generation by a two-dimensional symmetric flapping wing: immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann simulations. Fluid Dyn. Res. 44, 045504.Google Scholar
Sane, S. P. 2003 The aerodynamics of insect flight. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 4191–4208.Google Scholar
Shu, C., Liu, N. & Chew, Y. T. 2007 A novel immersed boundary velocity correction-lattice Boltzmann method and its application to simulate flow past a circular cylinder. J. Comput. Phys. 226, 1607–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuster, M. D. 1993 A survey of attitude representations. J. Astronaut. Sci. 41, 439–517.Google Scholar
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S. K., Trizila, P., Kang, C. K., Cesnik, C. E. S. & Liu, H. 2010 Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 46, 284–327.Google Scholar
Shyy, W., Lian, Y., Tang, J., Viieru, D. & Liu, H. 2008 Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Srygley, R. B. & Thomas, A. L. R. 2002 Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies. Nature 420, 660–664.Google Scholar
Succi, S. 2001 The Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Fluid Dynamics and Beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sui, Y., Chew, Y. T., Roy, P. & Low, H. T. 2008 A hybrid method to study flow-induced deformation of three-dimensional capsules. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 6351–6371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, M. 2005 High-lift generation and power requirements of insect flight. Fluid Dyn. Res. 37, 21–39.Google Scholar
Sun, M. & Tang, J. 2002 Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunada, S. 1993 Performance of a butterfly in take-off flight. J. Exp. Biol. 183, 249–277.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K. & Inamuro, T. 2011 Effect of internal mass in the simulation of a moving body by the immersed boundary method. Comput. Fluids 49, 173–187.Google Scholar
Taira, K. & Colonius, T. 2009 Three-dimensional flows around low-aspect-ratio flat-plate wings at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 623, 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, H. & Shimoyama, I. 2010 Forward flight of swallowtail butterfly with simple flapping motion. Bioinspir. Biomim. 5, 026003.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. K., Nudds, R. L. & Thomas, A. L. R. 2003 Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency. Nature 425, 707–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triantafyllou, G. S., Triantafyllou, M. S. & Grosenbaugh, M. A. 1993 Optimal thrust development in oscillating foils with application to fish propulsion. J. Fluids Struct. 7, 205–224.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. J. 2000 Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight. J. Fluid Mech. 410, 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. & Shu, C. 2010 An improved immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for simulating three-dimensional incompressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 5022–5042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. H. & Sun, M. 2004 Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 1137–1150.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, N., Senda, K., Iima, K. & Hirai, N. 2013 Aerodynamic forces and vortical structures in flapping butterfly’s forward flight. Phys. Fluids 25, 021902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, L., Huang, Q., Deng, X. & Sane, S. P. 2010 Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 485–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, L., Hedrick, T. & Mittal, R. 2013 A comparative study of the hovering efficiency of flapping and revolving wings. Bioinspir. Biomim. 8, 036001.Google Scholar