Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-rcs6z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T07:17:38.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bjerknes forces between two bubbles. Part 1. Response to a step change in pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Nikolaos A. Pelekasis  and
John A. Tsamopoulos
Nikolaos A. Pelekasis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
John A. Tsamopoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is well known from experiments in acoustic cavitation that two bubbles pulsating in a liquid may attract or repel each other depending on whether they oscillate in or out of phase, respectively. The forces responsible for this phenomenon are called ‘Bjerknes’ forces. When attractive forces are present the two bubbles are seen to accelerate towards each other and coalesce (Kornfeld & Suvorov 1944) and occasionally even breakup in the process. In the present study the response of two initially equal and spherical bubbles is examined under a step change in the hydrostatic pressure at infinity. A hybrid boundary–finite element method is used in order to follow the shape deformation and change in the potential of the two interfaces. Under the conditions mentioned above the two bubbles are found to attract each other always, with a force inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them when this distance is large, a result known to Bjerknes. As time increases the two bubbles continue accelerating towards each other and often resemble either the spherical-cap shapes observed by Davies & Taylor (1950), or the globally deformed shapes observed by Kornfeld & Suvorov (1944). Such shapes occur for sufficiently large or small values of the Bond number respectively (based on the average acceleration). It is also shown here that spherical-cap shapes arise through a Rayleigh–Taylor instability, whereas globally deformed shapes occur as a result of subharmonic resonance between the volume oscillations of the two bubbles and certain non-spherical harmonics (Hall & Seminara 1980). Eventually, in both cases the two bubbles break up due to severe surface deformation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 254 , September 1993 , pp. 467 - 499
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker, G. R., Meiron, D. I. & Orszag, S. A. 1984 Boundary integral methods for axisymmetric and three-dimensional Rayleigh–Taylor instability problems. Physica 12D, 19–31.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Benjamin, T. B. 1987 Hamiltonian theory for motions of bubbles in an infinite liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 349–379.Google Scholar
Bjerknes, V. F. K. 1906 Fields of Force. Columbia University Press.
Bjerknes, V. F. K. 1909 Die Craftfelder. Vieweg.
Blake, F. G. 1949 Bjerknes forces in stationary sound fields. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 21, 551(1.)Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1981 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Dover.
Crum, L. A. 1974 Bjerknes forces on bubbles in a stationary sound field. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 1363–1370.Google Scholar
Crum, L. A. & Nordling, D. A. 1972 Velocity of transient cavities in an acoustic stationary wave. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 294–301.Google Scholar
Davies, R. M. & Taylor, G. I. 1950 The mechanics of large bubbles rising through extended liquids and through liquids in tubes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 200, 375–390.Google Scholar
Eller, A. I. 1967 Force on a bubble in a standard acoustic wave. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43, 170–171(L.)Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Seminara, G. 1980 Nonlinear oscillations of non-spherical cavitation bubbles in acoustic fields. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 423–444.Google Scholar
Hammitt, F. G. 1980 Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Phenomena. McGraw-Hill.
Harper, E. Y., Grube, G. W. & Chang, I-D. 1972 On the breakup of accelerating liquid drops. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 565–591.Google Scholar
Hicks, W. 1879 On the problem of two pulsating spheres in a fluid. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 3, 276–285.Google Scholar
Hicks, W. 1880 On the problem of two pulsating spheres in a fluid. Part II. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 4, 29–35.Google Scholar
Kornfeld, M. & Suvorov, L. 1944 On the destructive action of cavitation. J. Appl. Phys. 15, 495–506.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Cokelet, E. D. 1976 The deformation of steep surface waves on water, I. A numerical method of computation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 350, 1–26.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1977 On Hamilton's principle for surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 153–158.Google Scholar
Morse, M. P. & Feshbach, H. 1953 Methods of Theoretical Physics. McGraw-Hill.
Oguz, H. N. & Prosperetti, A. 1990 A generalization of the impulse and virial theorems with an application to bubble oscillations. J. Fluid Mech. 218, 143–162.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. 1884 On the motion of spherical and ellipsoidal bodies in fluid media. Q. Appl. Maths 20, 60–80.Google Scholar
Pelekasis, N. A. 1991 A study on drop and bubble dynamics via a hybrid boundary element–finite element methodology. PhD thesis, SUNY at Buffalo.
Pelekasis, N. A. & Tsamopoulos, J. A. 1993 Bjerknes forces between two bubbles. Part 2. Response to an oscillatory pressure field. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 501–527.Google Scholar
Pelekasis, N. A., Tsamopoulos, J. A. & Manolis, G. D. 1991 Nonlinear oscillations of liquid shells in zero gravity. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 541–582 (referred to herein as PTM1.)Google Scholar
Pelekasis, N. A., Tsamopoulos, J. A. & Manolis, G. D. 1992 A hybrid finite–boundary element method for inviscid flows with free surface. J. Comput. Phys. 101, 231–251 (referred to herein as PTM2.)Google Scholar
Plesset, M. S. & Hsieh, D. Y. 1960 Theory of gas bubble dynamics in oscillating pressure fields. Phys. Fluids 3, 882–892.Google Scholar
Pullin, D. I. 1982 Numerical studies of surface-tension effects in nonlinear Kelvin–Helmholtz and Rayleigh-Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 507–532.Google Scholar
Sangani, A. S. 1991 A pairwise interaction theory for determining the linear acoustic properties of dilute bubbly liquids. J. Fluid Mech. 232, 221–284.Google Scholar
Scott, J. F. 1981 Singular perturbation applied to the collective oscillation of gas bubbles in a liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 487–511.Google Scholar
Tsamopoulos, J. A. & Brown, R. A. 1983 Nonlinear oscillations of inviscid drops and bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 127, 519–537.Google Scholar
Tsamopoulos, J. A. & Brown, R. A. 1987 Dynamic centering of liquid shells. Phys. Fluids 30, 27–35.Google Scholar
Zakharov, V. E. 1968 Stability of periodic waves of infinite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 2, 190–194 (transl. of Zh. Prikl. Mekh. Tekh. Fiz. 9(2), 86–94.)Google Scholar