Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2015
Using two-dimensional direct numerical simulations, we investigate the flow in a fluid of kinematic viscosity   ${\it\nu}$  and density
 ${\it\nu}$  and density   ${\it\rho}$  around elliptical foils of density
 ${\it\rho}$  around elliptical foils of density   ${\it\rho}_{s}$  with major axis
 ${\it\rho}_{s}$  with major axis   $c$  and minor axis
 $c$  and minor axis   $b$  for three different aspect ratios:
 $b$  for three different aspect ratios:   $AR=b/c=1$ (a circle);
 $AR=b/c=1$ (a circle);   $AR=0.5$ ; and
 $AR=0.5$ ; and   $AR=0.1$ . The vertical location of these foils
 $AR=0.1$ . The vertical location of these foils   $y_{s}(t)=A\sin (2{\rm\pi}f_{0}t)$  oscillates with amplitude
 $y_{s}(t)=A\sin (2{\rm\pi}f_{0}t)$  oscillates with amplitude   $A$  and frequency
 $A$  and frequency   $f_{0}$  in two distinct ways: ‘pure’ oscillation, where the foils are constrained to remain in place; and ‘flying’ oscillation, where horizontal motion is allowed. We simulate the flow for a range of the two appropriate control parameters, the non-dimensional amplitude, or Keulegan–Carpenter number
 $f_{0}$  in two distinct ways: ‘pure’ oscillation, where the foils are constrained to remain in place; and ‘flying’ oscillation, where horizontal motion is allowed. We simulate the flow for a range of the two appropriate control parameters, the non-dimensional amplitude, or Keulegan–Carpenter number   $KC=2{\rm\pi}A/c$ , and the non-dimensional frequency, or Stokes number
 $KC=2{\rm\pi}A/c$ , and the non-dimensional frequency, or Stokes number   ${\it\beta}=f_{0}c^{2}/{\it\nu}$ . We observe three distinct patterns of asymmetry, labelled ‘S-type’ for synchronous asymmetry, ‘
 ${\it\beta}=f_{0}c^{2}/{\it\nu}$ . We observe three distinct patterns of asymmetry, labelled ‘S-type’ for synchronous asymmetry, ‘  $\text{QP}_{\text{H}}$ -type’ and ‘
 $\text{QP}_{\text{H}}$ -type’ and ‘  $\text{QP}_{\text{L}}$ -type’ for quasi-periodic asymmetry at sufficiently high and sufficiently low (i.e.
 $\text{QP}_{\text{L}}$ -type’ for quasi-periodic asymmetry at sufficiently high and sufficiently low (i.e.   $AR=0.1$ ) aspect ratios, respectively. These patterns are separated at the critical locus in
 $AR=0.1$ ) aspect ratios, respectively. These patterns are separated at the critical locus in   $KC$ –
 $KC$ –  ${\it\beta}$  space by a ‘freezing point’ where the two incommensurate frequencies of the QP-type flows combine, and we show that this freezing point tends to occur at smaller values of
 ${\it\beta}$  space by a ‘freezing point’ where the two incommensurate frequencies of the QP-type flows combine, and we show that this freezing point tends to occur at smaller values of   $KC$  as
 $KC$  as   $AR$  decreases. We find for the smallest aspect ratio case (
 $AR$  decreases. We find for the smallest aspect ratio case (  $AR=0.1$ ) that the transition to asymmetry, for all values of
 $AR=0.1$ ) that the transition to asymmetry, for all values of   $KC$ , occurs for a critical value of an ‘amplitude’ Stokes number
 $KC$ , occurs for a critical value of an ‘amplitude’ Stokes number   ${\it\beta}_{A}={\it\beta}(KC)^{2}=4{\rm\pi}^{2}f_{0}A^{2}/{\it\nu}\simeq 3$ . The
 ${\it\beta}_{A}={\it\beta}(KC)^{2}=4{\rm\pi}^{2}f_{0}A^{2}/{\it\nu}\simeq 3$ . The   $\text{QP}_{\text{L}}$ -type asymmetry for
 $\text{QP}_{\text{L}}$ -type asymmetry for   $AR=0.1$  is qualitatively different in physical and mathematical structure from the
 $AR=0.1$  is qualitatively different in physical and mathematical structure from the   $\text{QP}_{\text{H}}$ -type asymmetry at higher aspect ratio. The flows at the two ends of the ellipse become essentially decoupled from each other for the
 $\text{QP}_{\text{H}}$ -type asymmetry at higher aspect ratio. The flows at the two ends of the ellipse become essentially decoupled from each other for the   $\text{QP}_{\text{L}}$ -type asymmetry, the two frequencies in the horizontal force signature being close to the primary frequency, rather than twice the primary frequency as in the
 $\text{QP}_{\text{L}}$ -type asymmetry, the two frequencies in the horizontal force signature being close to the primary frequency, rather than twice the primary frequency as in the   $\text{QP}_{\text{H}}$ -type asymmetry. Furthermore, the associated coefficients arising from a Floquet stability analysis close to the critical thresholds are profoundly different for low aspect ratio foils. Freedom to move slightly suppresses the transition to S-type asymmetry, and for certain parameters, if a purely oscillating foil subject to S-type asymmetry is released to move, flow symmetry is rapidly recovered due to the negative feedback of small horizontal foil motion. Conversely, for the ‘higher’ aspect ratios, the transition to
 $\text{QP}_{\text{H}}$ -type asymmetry. Furthermore, the associated coefficients arising from a Floquet stability analysis close to the critical thresholds are profoundly different for low aspect ratio foils. Freedom to move slightly suppresses the transition to S-type asymmetry, and for certain parameters, if a purely oscillating foil subject to S-type asymmetry is released to move, flow symmetry is rapidly recovered due to the negative feedback of small horizontal foil motion. Conversely, for the ‘higher’ aspect ratios, the transition to   $\text{QP}_{\text{H}}$ -type asymmetry is encouraged when the foil is allowed to move, with strong positive feedback occurring between the shed vortices from successive oscillation cycles. For
 $\text{QP}_{\text{H}}$ -type asymmetry is encouraged when the foil is allowed to move, with strong positive feedback occurring between the shed vortices from successive oscillation cycles. For   $AR=0.1$ , freedom to move significantly encourages the onset of asymmetry, but the newly observed ‘primary’
 $AR=0.1$ , freedom to move significantly encourages the onset of asymmetry, but the newly observed ‘primary’   $\text{QP}_{\text{L}}$ -type asymmetry found for pure oscillation no longer occurs when the foil flies, with S-type asymmetry leading ultimately to locomotion at a constant speed occurring all along the transition boundary for all values of
 $\text{QP}_{\text{L}}$ -type asymmetry found for pure oscillation no longer occurs when the foil flies, with S-type asymmetry leading ultimately to locomotion at a constant speed occurring all along the transition boundary for all values of   $KC$  and
 $KC$  and   ${\it\beta}$ .
 ${\it\beta}$ .
 ${\it\beta}$
                     
                   numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 
               520, 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
                        ${\it\beta}$
                     
                   numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 
               520, 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar