Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T00:09:16.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breakup and non-coalescence mechanism of aqueous droplets suspended in castor oil under electric field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2019

Subhankar Roy ,
Vikky Anand Open the ORCID record for Vikky Anand [Opens in a new window]  and
Rochish M. Thaokar Open the ORCID record for Rochish M. Thaokar [Opens in a new window]
Subhankar Roy
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
Vikky Anand
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
Rochish M. Thaokar*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: rochish@che.iitb.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of an electric field on the coalescence of two water droplets suspended in an insulating oil (castor oil) in the non-coalescence regime is investigated. Unlike the immediate breakup of the bridge, as reported in earlier studies, e.g. Ristenpart et al. (Nature, vol. 461 (7262), 2009, pp. 377–380), the non-coalescence observed in our experiments indicate that at strong fields the droplets exhibit a tendency to coalesce, the intervening bridge thickens whereafter the bridge dramatically begins to thin, initiating non-coalescence. Numerical simulations using the boundary integral method are able to explain the physical mechanism of thickening of this bridge followed by thinning and non-coalescence. The underlying reason is the competing meridional and azimuthal curvatures which affect the pressure inside the bridge to become either positive or negative under the effect of electric field induced Maxwell stresses. Velocity and pressure profiles confirm this hypothesis and we are able to predict this behaviour of transitory coalescence followed by non-coalescence.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Breakup/coalescence Drops and Bubbles: Drops Drops and Bubbles: Electrohydrodynamic effects
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 878 , 10 November 2019 , pp. 820 - 833
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, R. S. & Mason, S. G. 1962 Particle motions in sheared suspensions. XIV. Coalescence of liquid drops in electric and shear fields. J. Colloid Sci. 17 (4), 383–408.Google Scholar
Anand, V., Roy, S., Naik, V. M., Juvekar, V. A. & Thaokar, R. M. 2019 Electrocoalescence of a pair of conducting drops in an insulating oil. J. Fluid Mech. 859, 839–850.Google Scholar
Atten, P. 1993 Electrocoalescence of water droplets in an insulating liquid. J. Electrostat. 30, 259–269.Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. T., Généro, G. A. & Bird, J. C. 2015 Coalescence and break-up of nearly inviscid conical droplets. J. Fluid Mech. 763, 369–385.Google Scholar
Baygents, J. C., Rivette, N. J. & Stone, H. A. 1998 Electrohydrodynamic deformation and interaction of drop pairs. J. Fluid Mech. 368, 359–375.Google Scholar
Bird, J. C., Ristenpart, W. D., Belmonte, A. & Stone, H. A. 2009 Critical angle for electrically driven coalescence of two conical droplets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (16), 164502.Google Scholar
Cottrell, F. G. & Speed, J. B.1911 Separating and collecting particles of one liquid suspended in another liquid. US Patent 987,115.Google Scholar
De Gennes, P.-G., Brochard-Wyart, F. & Quéré, D. 2004 Capillarity and gravity. In Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena, pp. 33–67. Springer.Google Scholar
Eggers, J., Lister, J. R. & Stone, H. A. 1999 Coalescence of liquid drops. J. Fluid Mech. 401, 293–310.Google Scholar
Harris, F. W.1918 Process and apparatus for dehydrating emulsions. US Patent 1,281,952.Google Scholar
Karyappa, R. B., Deshmukh, S. D. & Thaokar, R. M. 2014 Breakup of a conducting drop in a uniform electric field. J. Fluid Mech. 754, 550–589.Google Scholar
Laird, R. E. & Raney, J. H.1914 Process of treating petroleum emulsions. US Patent 1,116,299.Google Scholar
Laird, R. E. & Raney, J. H.1915 Treater for petroleum emulsions. US Patent 1,142,759.Google Scholar
Lu, J., Fang, S. & Corvalan, C. M. 2016 Coalescence dynamics of viscous conical drops. Phys. Rev. E 93 (2), 023111.Google Scholar
Mhatre, S., Deshmukh, S. & Thaokar, R. M. 2015 Electrocoalescence of a drop pair. Phys. Fluids 27 (9), 092106.Google Scholar
Mhatre, S. & Thaokar, R. 2015 Electrocoalescence in non-uniform electric fields: an experimental study. Chem. Engng Process.: Process Intensification 96, 28–38.Google Scholar
Owe Berg, T. G., Fernish, G. C. & Gaukler, T. A. 1963 The mechanism of coalescence of liquid drops. J. Atmos. Sci. 20 (2), 153–158.Google Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 1992 Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ristenpart, W. D., Bird, J. C., Belmonte, A., Dollar, F. & Stone, H. A. 2009 Non-coalescence of oppositely charged drops. Nature 461 (7262), 377–380.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Roy et al. supplementary material

Roy et al. supplementary material

Download Roy et al. supplementary material(File)
File 321.9 KB