Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T22:14:27.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Additional Evidence of Heteroscedasticity in the Market Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Roger P. Bey  and
George E. Pinches
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sharpe's market model [29] is widely used both by academic researchers and practitioners in finance, but it cannot be accepted with complete confidence until some of its basic assumptions are tested more thoroughly. The applicability, usefulness, and reliability of the model are functions of its conformity to real data, which in turn depends partly on the unresolved question of heteroscedasticity.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 299 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bacon, R. W. “A Note on the Effects of Heteroscedasticity in Econometric Models Estimated by Ordinary Least Squares.” Bulletin of The Oxford University Institute of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 33 (05 1971), pp. 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Belkaoui, Ahmed. “Canadian Evidence of Heteroscedasticity in the Market Model.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 32 (09 1977), pp. 1320–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Black, Fischer; Jensen, Michael C.; and Scholes, Myron. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, ed. by Jensen, Michael C.. New York: Praeger Publishers (1972).Google Scholar
[4]Blume, Marshall E. “On the Assessment of Risk.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 26 (03 1971), pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Brenner, Menachem and Smidt, Seymour. “A Simple Model of Non-Stationarity of Systematic Risk.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 32 (09 1977), pp. 1081–1092.Google Scholar
[6]Brown, Stephen J. “Heteroscedasticity in the Market Model: A Comment.” Journal of Business, Vol. 50 (01 1977), pp. 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Conover, W. J.Practical Nonparametric Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1971).Google Scholar
[8]Epps, Thomas W. and Epps, Mary Lee. “The Robustness of Some Standard Tests for Autocorrelation and Heteroscedasticity When Both Problems Are Present.” Econometrica, Vol. 45 (04 1977), pp. 745–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Fama, Eugene F.Foundations of Finance. New York: Basic Books, Inc. (1976).Google Scholar
[10]Fama, Eugene F.; Fisher, Lawrence; Jensen, Michael C.; and Roll, Richard. “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information.” International Economic Review, Vol. 10 (02 1969), pp. 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Fama, Eugene F.; Fisher, Lawrence; Jensen, Michael C.; and Roll, Richard and MacBeth, James D.. “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81 (05/06 1973), pp. 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Galai, Dan and Masulis, Ronald W.. “The Option Pricing Model and the Risk Factor of Stock.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3 (01/03 1976), pp. 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Glejser, H. “A New Test for Heteroscedasticity.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 41 (03 1969), pp. 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Goldfeld, Stephen M. and Quandt, Richard E.. Nonlinear Methods in Econometrics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. (1972).Google Scholar
[15]Goldfeld, Stephen M. and Quandt, Richard E. “Some Tests for Homoscedasticity.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 40 (06 1965), pp. 539–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Harvey, A.C. and Phillips, G.D.A.. “A Comparison of the Power of Some Tests for Heteroscedasticity in the General Linear Model.” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 2 (1974), pp. 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Hedayat, A. and Robson, D.S.. “Independent Stepwise Residuals for Testing Homoscedasticity.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol.65 (12 1970), pp. 1573–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Hollander, Myles and Wolfe, Douglas A.. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1973).Google Scholar
[19]Horn, Susan D.; Horn, Roger A.; and Duncan, David B.. “Estimating Heteroscedastic Variances in Linear Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 70 (06 1975), pp. 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Johnston, John. Econometric Methods (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. (1972).Google Scholar
[21]Kmenta, Jan.Elements of Econometrics. New York: The Macmillan Co. (1971).Google Scholar
[22]Kraus, Alan and Litzenberger, Robert H.. “Skewness Preference and the Valuation of Risk Assets.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 31 (09 1976), pp. 1085–1100.Google Scholar
[23]Martin, John D. and Klemkosky, Robert C.. “Evidence of Heteroscedasticity in the Market Model.” Journal of Business, Vol. 48 (01 1975), pp.81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Miller, Merton H. and Scholes, Myron. “Rates of Return in Relation to Risk: A Re-Examination of Some Recent Findings.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, ed. by Jensen, Michael C.. New York: Praeger Publishers (1972).Google Scholar
[25]Morgan, I.G. “Stock Prices and Heteroscedasticity.” Journal of Business, Vol. 49 (10 1976), pp. 496–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Park, R.E. “Estimation with Heteroscedastic Error Terms.” Econometrica, Vol. 34 (10 1966), p. 888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Praetz, Peter D.. “Australian Share Prices and the Random Walk Hypothesis.” Australian Journal of Statistics, Vol. 11 (11 1969), pp. 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Rao, C. Radhasksirhna. “Estimation of Heteroscedastic Variances in Linear Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 65 (03 1970), pp. 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Sharpe, William F. “A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis.” Management Science, Vol. 9 (01 1963), pp. 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]Thiel, Henri. Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1971).Google Scholar
[31]Westerfield, Randolph. “The Distribution of Common Stock Price Changes: An Application of Transactions Time and Subordinated Stochastic Models.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 12 (12 1977), pp. 743–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar