Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-k7rjm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T05:55:58.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal Portfolio Choice with Fat Tails and Parameter Uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2025

Raymond Kan  and
Nathan Lassance Open the ORCID record for Nathan Lassance [Opens in a new window]
Raymond Kan
Affiliation:
https://ror.org/03dbr7087 University of Toronto Rotman School of Management raymond.kan@rotman.utoronto.ca
Nathan Lassance*
Affiliation:
https://ror.org/02495e989 UCLouvainLFIN/LIDAM
*
nathan.lassance@uclouvain.be (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Existing portfolio combination rules that optimize the out-of-sample performance under parameter uncertainty assume multivariate normally distributed returns. However, we show that this assumption is not innocuous because fat tails in returns lead to poorer out-of-sample performance of the sample mean–variance and sample global minimum-variance (GMV) portfolios relative to normality. Consequently, when returns are fat-tailed, portfolio combination rules should allocate less to the sample mean–variance and sample GMV portfolios, and more to the risk-free asset, than the normality assumption prescribes. Empirical evidence shows that accounting for fat tails in the construction of optimal portfolio combination rules significantly improves their out-of-sample performance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , First View , pp. 1 - 38
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

We are grateful to George G. Pennacchi (the editor), Konark Saxena (the referee), Xinghua Zheng, and Guofu Zhou for their valuable comments.

References

Ao, M.; Li, Y.; and Zheng, X.. “Approaching Mean-Variance Efficiency for Large Portfolios.” Review of Financial Studies, 32 (2019), 2890–2919.10.1093/rfs/hhy105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barroso, P., and Saxena, K.. “Lest We Forget: Using Out-of-Sample Forecast Errors in Portfolio Optimization.” Review of Financial Studies, 35 (2021), 1222–1278.10.1093/rfs/hhab041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, E.; Kozbur, D.; and Wolf, M.. “Hedging Forecast Combinations with an Application to the Random Forest.” arXiv Working Paper (2023).10.2139/ssrn.5032102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., and Berkane, M.. “Greatest Lower Bound to the Elliptical Theory Kurtosis Parameter.” Biometrika, 73 (1986), 240–241.10.1093/biomet/73.1.240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryzgalova, S.; Pelger, M.; and Zhu, J.. “Forest through the Trees: Building Cross-Sections of Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, forthcoming (2025).Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G. “A Characterization of the Distributions That Imply Mean-Variance Utility Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory, 29 (1983), 185–201.10.1016/0022-0531(83)90129-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopra, V. K., and Ziemba, W. T.. “The Effect of Errors in Means, Variances, and Covariances on Optimal Portfolio Choice.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 19 (1993), 6–11.Google Scholar
DeMiguel, V.; Garlappi, L.; and Uppal, R.. “Optimal versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient Is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy?” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 1915–1953.10.1093/rfs/hhm075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMiguel, V.; Martín-Utrera, A.; and Nogales, F.. “Size Matters: Optimal Calibration of Shrinkage Estimators for Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 37 (2013), 3018–3034.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMiguel, V.; Martín-Utrera, A.; and Nogales, F.. “Parameter Uncertainty in Multiperiod Portfolio Optimization with Transaction Costs.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50 (2015), 1443–1471.10.1017/S002210901500054XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denk, S., and Löffler, G.. “Predicting the Equity Premium with Combination Forecasts: A Reappraisal.” The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 14 (2024), 545–577.10.1093/rapstu/raae009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Karoui, N. “High-Dimensionality Effects in the Markowitz Problem and Other Quadratic Programs with Linear Constraints: Risk Underestimation.” Annals of Statistics, 38 (2010), 3487–3566.10.1214/10-AOS795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Karoui, N. “On the Realized Risk of High-Dimensional Markowitz Portfolios.” SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 4 (2013), 737–783.10.1137/090774926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R.; Ferstenberg, R.; and Russell, J.. “Measuring and Modeling Execution Cost and Risk.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 38 (2012), 14–28.Google Scholar
Frahm, G., and Memmel, C.. “Dominating Estimators for Minimum-Variance Portfolios.” Journal of Econometrics, 159 (2010), 289–302.10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagannathan, R., and Ma, T.. “Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 1651–1683.10.1111/1540-6261.00580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobson, J., and Korkie, B.. “Estimation for Markowitz Efficient Portfolios.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75 (1980), 544–554.10.1080/01621459.1980.10477507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorion, P. “Bayes-Stein Estimation for Portfolio Analysis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21 (1986), 279–292.10.2307/2331042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, R., and Smith, D.. “The Distribution of the Sample Minimum-Variance Frontier.” Management Science, 54 (2008), 1364–1380.10.1287/mnsc.1070.0852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, R., and Wang, X.. “Optimal Portfolio Choice with Unknown Benchmark Efficiency.” Management Science, 70 (2023), 6117–6138.Google Scholar
Kan, R.; Wang, X.; and Zheng, X.. “In-Sample and Out-of-Sample Sharpe Ratios of Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Models.” Journal of Financial Economics, 155 (2024), 103837.10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, R.; Wang, X.; and Zhou, G.. “Optimal Portfolio Choice with Estimation Risk: No Risk-Free Asset Case.” Management Science, 68 (2021), 2047–2068.10.1287/mnsc.2021.3989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, R., and Zhou, G.. “Optimal Portfolio Choice with Parameter Uncertainty.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42 (2007), 621–656.10.1017/S0022109000004129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassance, N.; Martín-Utrera, A.; and Simaan, M.. “The Risk of Expected Utility under Parameter Uncertainty.” Management Science, 70 (2024a), 7644–7663.10.1287/mnsc.2023.00178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassance, N.; Vanderveken, R.; and Vrins, F.. “On the Combination of Naive and Mean-Variance Portfolio Strategies.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 42 (2024b), 875–889.10.1080/07350015.2023.2256801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledoit, O., and Wolf, M.. “Nonlinear Shrinkage of the Covariance Matrix for Portfolio Selection: Markowitz Meets Goldilocks.” Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 4349–4388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martellini, L., and Ziemann, V.. “Improved Estimates of Higher-Order Comoments and Implications for Portfolio Selection.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 1467–1502.10.1093/rfs/hhp099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaud, R. “The Markowitz Optimization Enigma: Is ‘Optimized’ Optimal?” Financial Analysts Journal, 45 (1989), 31–42.10.2469/faj.v45.n1.31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novy-Marx, R., and Velikov, M.. “A Taxonomy of Anomalies and Their Trading Costs.” The Review of Financial Studies, 29 (2016), 104–147.10.1093/rfs/hhv063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okhrin, Y., and Schmid, W.. “Distributional Properties of Portfolio Weights.” Journal of Econometrics, 134 (2006), 235–256.10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.06.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapach, D.; Strauss, J.; and Zhou, G.. “Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Combination Forecasts and Links to the Real Economy.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 821–862.10.1093/rfs/hhp063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuhmacher, F.; Kohrs, H.; and Auer, B.. “Justifying Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection When Asset Returns Are Skewed.” Management Science, 67 (2021), 7812–7824.10.1287/mnsc.2020.3846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, J., and Zhou, G.. “Data-Generating Process Uncertainty: What Difference Does It Make in Portfolio Decisions?” Journal of Financial Economics, 72 (2004), 385–421.10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, J., and Zhou, G.. “Markowitz Meets Talmud: A Combination of Sophisticated and Naive Diversification Strategies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2011), 204–215.10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, M., and Zhou, G.. “Why Naive 1/N Diversification Is Not So Naive, and How to Beat It?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59 (2024), 3601–3632.10.1017/S0022109023001175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kan and Lassance supplementary material

Kan and Lassance supplementary material
Download Kan and Lassance supplementary material(File)
File 605.2 KB