Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-gwv8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-27T22:24:12.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patent Growth in the Old Dominion: The Impact of Railroad Integration before 1880

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

William H. Phillips
William H. Phillips
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Economics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Endogenous growth theories suggest that market integration will be more conducive to economic development when the previously isolated regions have large stocks of human capital. This paper uses the level of per capita patenting in nineteenth-century Virginia to measure this human capital. By the end of the 1870s, the rail network of the Old Dominion was rapidly being integrated with the rest of the nation. Inventiveness spread throughout northern Virginia, but the former plantation areas of the state fell behind.

Information

Type
Papers Presented at the Fifty-First Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 389 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bairoch, Paul, Cities and Economic Development (Chicago, 1988).Google Scholar
Carlton, David L., “The Revolution From Above: The National Market and the Beginnings of Industrialization in North Carolina,” Journal of American History, 77 (09 1990), pp. 445–75.Google Scholar
Cooper, Grace Rogers, The Sewing Machine: Its Invention and Development (Washington, D.C., 1976).Google Scholar
David, Paul, “The Mechanization of Reaping in the Antebellum Midwest,” in David, Paul, Technical Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth (Cambridge, 1975), pp. 195–232.Google Scholar
Feller, Irwin, “The Urban Location of United States Invention, 1860–1910,” Explorations in Economic History, 8 (Spring 1971), pp. 285–303.Google Scholar
“Gibbs, James Ethan Allen,” in The National Cyclopaedia of American Biography (New York, 1926), vol. 19, pp. 255–56.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert, “American Inventiveness, 1870–1920,” Journal of Political Economy, 79 (05/06 1971), pp. 661–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilliard, Sam Bowers, Atlas of Antebellum Southern Agriculture (Baton Rouge, 1984).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, William T., Cyrus Hall McCormick: Seed Time, 1809–1856 (New York, 1930).Google Scholar
Johnston, Angus James II, Virginia Railroads in the Civil War (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1961).Google Scholar
Kenzer, Robert C., “The Black Businessman in the Postwar South: North Carolina, 1865–1880,” Business History Review, 63 (Spring 1989), pp. 61–87.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul, “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography,” Journal of Political Economy, 99 (06 1991), pp. 483–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinig, D. W., The Shaping of America: A Geographical Perspective on 500 Years of History, vol. I, Atlantic America, 1492–1800 (New Haven, 1986).Google Scholar
Meyer, David R., “The Industrial Retardation of Southern Cities, 1860–1880,” Explorations in Economic History, 25 (10 1988), pp. 366–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David R., “Midwestern Industrialization and the American Manufacturing Belt in the Nineteenth Century,” this Journal, 49 (12 1989), pp. 921–37.Google Scholar
Paskoff, Paul F., “Invention and Culture in the Old South, 1790–1860” (Unpublished Manuscript, Louisiana State University, 1991).Google Scholar
Pred, Allen R., The Spatial Dynamics of U.S. Urban-Industrial Growth, 1800–1914 (Cambridge, 1966).Google Scholar
Pred, Allen R., Urban Growth and the Circulation of Information: The United States System of Cities, 1790–1840 (Cambridge, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Batiz, Luis A., and Romer, Paul, “Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (05 1991), pp. 531–55.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul, “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy, 98 (10 1990), pp. S71–S102.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790–1846,” this Journal, 48 (1988), pp. 813–50.Google Scholar
Taylor, George Rogers, The Transportation Revolution (New York, 1951).Google Scholar
Thorndale, William, and Dollarhide, William, Map Guide to the U.S. Federal Censuses, 1790–1920 (Baltimore, 1987).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States from Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, D.C., 1975).Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office, Tenth Census, 1880, Compendium of the Tenth Census, part 1, Population (Washington, D.C., 1883).Google Scholar
U. S. Commissioner of Patents, Annual Reports (Washington, D.C.).Google Scholar
Works Projects Administration, Virginia: A Guide to the Old Dominion (New York, 1940).Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin, Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy Since the Civil War (New York, 1986).Google Scholar