Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-7sgmh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T11:02:38.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Strained International Relations between Korea and Japan: Shinzo Abe’s Territorial Claim over Dokdo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2025

Edward Kwon*
Affiliation:
Northern Kentucky University, KY, USA
*

Abstract

This article analyzes how Shinzo Abe employed various strategies to challenge Korean sovereignty over Dokdo on the international stage and to promote Japan’s territorial claims on the islets domestically. Through a series of speeches discussed at Japan’s National Diet among Abe’s cabinet ministers and members of the Diet, this article investigates how and by what policy instruments the Abe cabinet infiltrated and revitalized Japan’s territorial claims over Dokdo across the nation. Several members of the Diets and ministers discussed the Dokdo issue amid worsening Korea–Japan relations stemming from Abe’s revisionism. Content analysis revealed that Japanese lawmakers and cabinet members were very frustrated about Korea’s effective control of Dokdo as well as the Korean government’s stance on comfort women and forced labor. Quantitative analyses found increases in the average intensity of Dokdo remarks following the Abe cabinet’s hardline stance toward President Moon’s government. Regression analysis confirms that the average intensity of Dokdo remarks was intensified by cabinet approval ratings, conservative rightwing politicians, and Japan’s domestic economic conditions.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The East Asia Institute

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramson, Scott F., and Carter, David B.. 2016. “The Historical Origins of Territorial Disputes.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 675–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bae, Chinsoo. 2012. “Territorial Issue in the Context of Colonial History and International Politics: The Dokdo Issue between Korea and Japan.” The Journal of East Asian Affairs 26 (1): 1951.Google Scholar
Bukh, Alexander. 2016. “Korean National Identity, Civic Activism and the Dokdo/Takeshima Territorial Dispute.” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 3 (2): 183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellino, Joshua, and Redondo, Elvira Dominguez. 2015. “The Title to Dokdo/Takeshima: Addressing the Legacy of World War II Territorial Settlements/ Finding the Right Settlement of Dispute Mechanism.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 22 (4): 550–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Jinman, Kim, Hee Min, and Choi, Jung Young. 2009. “The Dokdo/Takeshima Dispute between Korea and Japan: Understanding the Whole Picture.” Pacific Focus 24 (3): 365–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Ki-weon. 2019. “Japanese Museum Claiming Dokdo to be Japanese Territory to be Expanded and Relocated.” The Hankyoreh, December 18. www.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/921316.html.Google Scholar
Choe, Sang-Hun. 2015. “Apology, If Not Closure, for ‘Comfort Women.’” The New York Times, December 29, A1.Google Scholar
Choe, Sang-Hun. 2018. “Court Ruling On Mitsubishi Irks Japan.” The New York Times, November 30, A6.Google Scholar
Choi, Sung-jae. 2005. “The Politics of the Dokdo Issue.” Journal of East Asian Studies 5 (3): 465–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooley, Ben. 2019. “Japan Is Seen Using Trade As Cudgel.” The New York Times, July 16.Google Scholar
Dooley, Ben, and Choe, Sang-Hun. 2019. “Spooking Global Markets, Japan Restricts Trade With South Korea.” The New York Times, August 2.Google Scholar
Fackler, Martin. 2012. “Japan Election Returns Power To Old Guard.” The New York Times, December 17, A1.Google Scholar
Gil, Yun-hyung, and Kim, Oi-hyun. 2015. “At Summit, Abe Says All the Key Points were Raised.” The Hankyoreh, November 3. http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/715734.html.Google Scholar
Gittleson, Ben, and Trotter, Anthony. 2018. “Japan Protests Dessert to Be Served to North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un.” ABC News, April 25. https://abcnews.go.com/International/japan-protests-dessert-served-north-korean-leader-kim/story?id=54718602.Google Scholar
Hara, Kimie. 2012. “The San Francisco Peace Treaty and Frontier Problems in the Reginal Order in East Asia: A Sixty Year Perspective.” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 10 (17), https://apjjf.org/2012/10/17/kimie-hara/3739/article.Google Scholar
Harding, Robin, White, Edward, and Song, Jung-a. 2019. “Japan Set to Remove South Korea from Export ‘White List.’” The Financial Times, August 1. www.ft.com/content/a850700a-b42e-11e9-8cb2-799a3a8cf37b.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul, Kim, Sunwoong, and Roehrig, Terence, eds. 2021. The Dokdo/Takeshima Dispute South Korea: South Korea, Japan, and the Search for a Peaceful Solution. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Wonjae. Cho, Wonbin, and Wiegand, Krista. 2018. “Do Korean–Japanese Historical Disputes Generate Rally Effects?The Journal of Asian Studies 77 (3): 693711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2018. “Japan–ROK Summit Meeting.” September 25. www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/kr/page3e_000986.html.Google Scholar
Jin, Hyunjoo. 2019. “Seoul to File WTO Complaint Over Japan’s ‘Discriminatory’ Export Curbs.” Reuters. September 10. www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-japan/seoul-to-file-wto-complaint-over-japans-discriminatory-export-curbs-idUSKCN1VW019.Google Scholar
Karni, Edi. 2014. “Axiomatic Foundations of Expected Utility and Subjective Probability.” In Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty 1, eds. Machina, Mark and Viscusi, Kip. Oxford: North Holland. 139.Google Scholar
Kim, Kwang-tae. 2019. “(2nd LD) S. Korea to Remove Japan From Its ‘Whitelist’ of Trusted Trading Partners.” Yonhap News Agency. August 2. https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20190802009652320.Google Scholar
Kim, Seung-yeon. 2020. “S. Korea Says It Can End GSOMIA at Any Time, As Mutually Understood by Japan.” Yonhap News Agency, August 24. https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20200824004000325.Google Scholar
Koo, Min Gyo. 2005. “Economic Dependence and the Dokdo/Takeshima Dispute between South Korean and Japan.” Harvard Asia Quarterly 9 (4): 2435.Google Scholar
Kwon, Edward. 2016. “Japan’s Territorial Claim to Korea’s Dokdo: The Voice of the National Diet.” Korea Observer 47 (2): 227–66.Google Scholar
Kwon, Edward, and Benham, Liza Abram. 2016. “Shinzo Abe’s Scheme of Staking Territorial Claims to Korea’s Dokdo.” The Journal of Territorial and Maritime studies 3 (1): 4763.Google Scholar
Lee, Han Key. 1998. “Korea’s Territorial Rights to Tokdo in History and International Law.” Korea Observer 29 (1): 191.Google Scholar
Lee, Joyce, and Takenaka, Kiyoshi. 2018. “Japan to Skip Naval Event after South Korea Protests over ‘Rising Sun’ Flag.” Reuters, October 5. www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-japan-flag/japan-to-skip-naval-event-after-south-korea-protests-over-rising-sun-flag-idUSKCN1MF0D7.Google Scholar
Lee, Seokwoo, and Van Dyke, Jon M.. 2010. “The 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty and Its Relevance to the Sovereignty over Dokdo.” Chinese Journal of International Law 9 (1): 741–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1989. “The Diversionary Theory of War.” In Handbook of War Studies, ed. Midlarsky, Manus I.. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 259–88.Google Scholar
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). 2012. Comprehensive Policy Collection: J-File 2012 (自民党, 総合政策集: J-ファイル 2012).Google Scholar
Lin, Bonny, Chase, Michael S., Blank, Jonah, Cooper, Cortez A. III, Grossman, Derek, Harold, Scott W., Jennifer, D. P. Moroney, Morris, Lyle J., Ma, Logan, Orner, Paul, Shih, Alice, and Kim, Soo. 2020. Regional Responses to U.S.–China Competition in the Indo-Pacific: Study Overview and Conclusions. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Mayali, Laurent, and Yoo, John. 2018. “Resolution of Territorial Disputes in East Asia: The Case of Dokdo.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 36 (3): 505–51.Google Scholar
Miller, Steve. 2019. “No End in Sight for Radar Dispute Between Seoul and Tokyo.” VOA, January 28. www.voanews.com/a/radar-fight-between-south-korea-and-japan/4761576.html.Google Scholar
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. 2022. “Japanese Territory: Takeshima.” www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/takeshima/index.html.Google Scholar
Muller, John E. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” American Political Science Review 64 (1): 1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naito, Seichu. 2008. Territorial Issue Between Japan and Korea: Case of Takeshima/Dokdo. Tokyo: Sinkansha.Google Scholar
Oneal, John R. and Bryan, Anna Lillian. 1995. “The Rally ‘Round the Flag Effect in U.S. Foreign Policy Crises, 1950–1985.” Political Behavior 17 (4): 379401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panda, Ankit. 2017. “Jim Mattis Offers Japan Reassurance on the Disputed Senkaku Islands.” The Diplomat, February 6. https://thediplomat.com/2017/02/mattis-senkakus-covered-under-us-japan-security-treaty/.Google Scholar
Park, Hee Kwon, and Jong-In, Bae. 2008. “Korea’s Territorial Sovereignty over Tokdo.” Korea Observer 29 (1): 121–63.Google Scholar
Permanent Court of Arbitration. 2016. The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China), Case No. 2013–19. Award of July 12.Google Scholar
The Republic of Korea Cheongwadae. 2018. “The President and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe Hold Summit.” September 25. https://english1.president.go.kr/BriefingSpeeches/Briefings/329.Google Scholar
The Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2022. “The Korean Government’s Basic Position on Dokdo.” https://dokdo.mofa.go.kr/eng/dokdo/government_position.jsp.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Nico J., and Prislan, Vid. 2015. “Cases Concerning Sovereignty over Islands before the International Court of Justice and the Dokdo/Takeshima Issue.” Ocean Development & International Law 46 (4): 281314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Thomas, and Yoo, John. 2019. “Asian Territorial Disputes and the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty: The Case of Dokdo.” Chinese Journal of International Law 18 (3): 503–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siripala, Thisanka. 2018. “Dokdo or Takeshima? Japan and South Korea Reopen Territorial Row Ahead of Olympic Games.” The Diplomat, February 7, https://thediplomat.com/2018/02/dokdo-or-takeshima-japan-and-south-korea-reopen-territorial-row-ahead-of-olympic-games/.Google Scholar
Suk, Lauren, Ogura, Junko, and Wakatsuki, Yoko. 2017. “South Korea’s New President Questions Japan ‘Comfort Women’ Deal.” CNN, June 5. www.cnn.com/2017/05/11/asia/south-korea-japan-comfort-women/index.html.Google Scholar
Tarar, Ahmer. 2006. “Diversionary Incentives and the Bargaining Approach of War.” International Studies Quarterly 50 (1): 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, Jon M. 2007. “Legal Issues related to Sovereignty Over Dokdo and Its Maritime Boundary.” Ocean Development & International Law 38 (1–2): 157224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegand, Krista E. 2015. “The South Korean–Japanese Security Relationship and the Dokdo/Takeshima Islets Dispute.” The Pacific Review 28 (3): 347–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
News, Yonhap. 2017. “(2nd LD) S. Korean President Hits at Scrapping Deal with Japan Over Sexual Slavery,” Yonhap News Agency, May 17, https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20170511008652315.Google Scholar
News, Yonhap. 2019. “(3rd LD) S. Korea Releases 5 Photos of Japan’s ‘Threatening’ Flyby Close to Its Warship.” Yonhap News Agency, January 24. https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20190124003953315.Google Scholar
Yoo, Kang-moon and Park, Min-hee. 2019. “S. Korea Succumbs to US Pressure to Extend GSOMIA.” The Hankyeoreh, November 25.Google Scholar