Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-rcs6z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T03:50:25.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the effect of heat treatment during processing on the viscosity and stability of high-fat market cream

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. Rothwell
J. Rothwell
Affiliation:
Department of Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The viscosity of cream increased with increasing fat content, and higher values were obtained if the cream was separated at 38–43 °C rather than above 55 °C, and if the cream was cooled to below 15 °C before storage at 20 °C. The ‘type’ of viscosity varied with cooling and storage conditions; for example, cream cooled below 20 °C and stored at 20 °C gave increased viscosity readings with increased rates of shear due to churning of the cream, while the behaviour of cream cooled only to 20 °C was Newtonian.

Cream stability as measured by free fat content decreased with increasing fat content above about 42%, with low temperature separation (38–45 °C), with cooling to below 15 °C before storage at 20 °C, and with increased pressure at temperatures below 15 °C.

Dilatometric study of the amount of fat crystallization indicated that larger amounts of crystallization resulted in higher final viscosity and free fat content.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , October 1966 , pp. 245 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Babcock, C. J. (1931). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 249.Google Scholar
Crossley, E. L. & Rothwell, J. (1954). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 16 (9, 10), 687, 779.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, A. C. & Hening, J. C. (1925). Tech. Bull. N.Y. St. agric. Exp. Stn, no. 113.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. & Pyne, G. T. (1933). Econ. Proc. R. Dubl. Soc. 2 (29), 461.Google Scholar
Marquardt, J. G. & Dahlberg, A. C. (1934). Tech. Bull. N.Y. St. agric. Exp. Stn, no. 224.Google Scholar
Mulder, H. & Klomp, R. (1956). Neth. Milk Dairy J. 10, 123.Google Scholar
Rothwell, J. (1962). J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 15 (4), p. 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, J. & Crossley, E. L. (1956). 14th Int. Dairy Congr. 1 (2), 427.Google Scholar
Skelton, F. M. & Sommer, H. H. (1940). Bull. Wis. agric. Exp. Stn, no. 450, 8.Google Scholar
Sommer, H. H. & Royer, K. M. (1927). J. Dairy Sci. 10, 416.Google Scholar
Wallenfeldt, E. (1940). Milk Dlr 24 (5), 70.Google Scholar
Webb, B. H. & Hall, S. A. (1935). J. Dairy Sci. 18, 276.Google Scholar