Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:55:16.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensitivity of buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) to heat stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2019

Bishwa Bhaskar Choudhary  and
Smita Sirohi
Bishwa Bhaskar Choudhary*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics & Sociology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana141004, India
Smita Sirohi
Affiliation:
DESM Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, India
*
Author for correspondence: Bishwa Bhaskar Choudhary, Email: bishwa606@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on ten years of data (2001–10), consisting of 12 673 observations on fortnightly milk yield of buffaloes reared in a dairy farm located in the Northern sub-tropics (29°41′0″N, 76°59′0″E), the present study establishes the relationship between weather conditions and production performance of lactating buffaloes. The critical threshold level of maximum temperature-humidity index (THI) was estimated to be 74, which is higher than that of crossbred cows. The duration of discomfort period for buffaloes begins in mid-March and lasts up to early November. During the aggravated stress condition (THI > 82) prevailing in the region for about 5 months starting from early May, milk productivity declines by more than 1% per unit increase in maximum THI over 82. The maximum temperature and minimum humidity (viz. maximum THI) are the most critical weather parameters causing thermal stress in animals, however, the climatic conditions in the region are such that not only maximum but also minimum THI crosses the critical threshold providing little relief to the animals during the night.

Keywords

Milk productivitysub-tropicstemperature-humidity index

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 86 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 399 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Armstrong, DV (1994) Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2044–2050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltagi, BH (2005) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bouraoui, R, Lahmar, M, Majdoub, A, Djemali, M and Belyea, R (2002) The relationship of temperature humidity index with milk production of dairy cows in a Mediterranean climate. Animal Research 51, 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhary, BB (2017) Climate sensitivity of agriculture in trans and upper gangetic plains of India: Potential economic impact and vulnerability. Ph.D thesis, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana.Google Scholar
Dash, S, Chakravarty, AK, Sah, V, Jamuna, V, Behera, R, Kashyap, N and Deshmukh, N (2015) Influence of temperature and humidity on pregnancy rate of Murrah buffaloes under subtropical climate. Asian Australian Journal of Animal Science 28, 943–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davison, T, McGowan, M, Mayer, D, Young, B, Jonsson, N, Hall, A, Matschoss, A, Goodwin, P, Goughan, J and Lake, M (1996) Managing Hot Cows in Australia. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Department of Primary Industry, p. 58.Google Scholar
Deshazer, JA, Hahn, GL and Xin, H (2009) Basic principles of the thermal environment and livestock energetics. In: Deshazer, JA (ed.), Livestock Energetics and Thermal Environmental Management, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE), St. Joseph, MI, USA, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Du Preez, JH, Giesecke, WH and Hatiingh, PJ (1990) Heat stress in dairy cattle and other livestock under southern African conditions. I. Temperature-humidity index mean values during the four main seasons. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 57, 77–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Gantner, V, Mijic, P, Kuterovac, K, Barac, Z and Potocnik, K (2015) Heat stress and milk production in the first parity Holsteins-threshold determination in eastern Croatia. Poljoprivreda 21, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, GL (1999) Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. Journal of Animal Science 77, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huhnke, RL, McCowan, LC, Meraz, LC, Harp, SL and Payton, ME (2001) Determining the frequency and duration of elevated temperature-humidity index. Paper number 014111 ASAE Annual meeting.Google Scholar
Kaur, H and Arora, SP (1982) Influence of level of nutrition and season on the oestrous cycle rhythm and on fertility in buffaloes. Tropical Agriculture 49, 274–278.Google Scholar
Marai, IFM and Haeeb, AAM (2010) Buffalo's biological functions as affected by heat stress – a review. Livestock Science 127, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, RE (1972) Improvement of Livestock Production in Warm Climates. San Francisco, CA: Freeman. p. 711.Google Scholar
Mingala, CN, Villanueva, MA and Cruz, LC (2017) River and swamp buffaloes: History, distribution and their characteristics. In: Presicce, GA Chapter 1, The Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) - Production and Research. Bentham Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Niloforooshan, MA and Edriss, MA (2004) Effect of age at first calving on some productive and longevity traits in Iranian Holsteins of the Isfahan province. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 2130–2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravagnolo, O, Misztal, I and Hoogenboom, G (2000) Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, development of heat index function. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2120–2125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schutz, MM, Hansen, LB, Steuernagel, GR and Kuck, AL (1990) Variation of milk, fat, protein, and somatic cells for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafie, MM (1985) Physiological responses and adaptation of water buffalo. In Yousef, MK (ed.), Stress Physiology in Livestock, 2, Ungulates, Florida, USA: CRC, p. 67.Google Scholar
Sirohi, S, Bardhan, D and Chand, P (2016) Costs and returns in milk production: Developing standardized methodology and estimates for various production systems. A Project Report submitted to Department of Animal Husbandary, Dairying and Fisheries, New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.Google Scholar
Sirohi, S and Michaelowa, A (2007) Sufferer and causes: Indian livestock and climate change. Climatic Change 85, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St-Pierre, NR, Cobanov, B and Schnitkey, G (2003) Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. Journal of Dairy Science 86(E suppl.), 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tailor, SP and Nagda, RK (2005) Conception rate in buffaloes maintained under subhumid climate of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 58, 69–70.Google Scholar
Torshizi, ME, Aslamenejad, AA, Nassiri, MR and Farhangfar, H (2011) Comparison and evaluation of mathematical lactation curve functions of Iranian primiparous Holsteins. South African Journal of Animal Science 41, 104–115.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, RC, Singh, SV, Kumar, A, Gupta, SK and , Ashutosh (2007) Impact of climate change on milk production of Murrah buffaloes. Italian Journal of Animal Science 6 suppl 2, 1329–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wathes, CM, Jones, CDR and Webester, AJ (1983) Ventilation, air hygiene and animal health. Veterinary Record 113, 554–559.Google ScholarPubMed
West, JW, Mullinix, BG and Bernard, JK (2003) Effects of hot, humid weather on milk temperature, dry matter intake, and milk yield of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 232–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wooldridge, J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, London, England.Google Scholar
Zewdu, W, Thombre, BM and Bainwad, DV (2014) Effect of macro-climatic factors on milk production and reproductive efficiency of Holstein Friesian × Deoni crossbred cows. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 8, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar