Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-h4f6x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-06T20:59:00.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparing rumination activity using the Nedap® rumination sensor against analysis of video recordings in pre-weaned dairy calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2025

Kristian Ellingsen-Dalskau*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health, Welfare and Food Safety, The Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ås, Norway
Stine Grønmo Kischel
Affiliation:
R&D Department, Farm Advisory Services, Tine Raadgivning og Medlem, Ås, Norway
Laura Katherine Whalin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health, Welfare and Food Safety, The Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ås, Norway
Julie Føske Johnsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health, Welfare and Food Safety, The Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ås, Norway
*
Corresponding author: Kristian Ellingsen-Dalskau; Email: kristian.ellingsen@vetinst.no

Abstract

This Research Communication describes a pilot study to validate a rumination sensor for pre-weaned dairy calves. There is increasing interest in precision livestock farming (PLF) tools to capture behaviours and health parameters in farm animals. However, much of the research has focused on devices suitable for adult animals, and few devices have been validated for young animals. The aim of our pilot study was to validate the rumination estimates from Nedap rumination sensors® (NRS) when worn by dairy calves less than 2 months of age. Eight Norwegian Red dairy calves were raised in a cow-directed cow-calf-contact system such that cows could visit their calves through a smartgate. At 21 days of age, an NRS was secured around the neck of each calf, to record the amount of time spent ruminating/24 h. Cameras were placed above the calf areas to record the calves for the entirety of the study. When the calves were 28 and 58 d old, four trained observers recorded rumination behaviour 24 h/d from the video recordings. The video data and the NRS data recorded over 24 h on the same days were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the Spearman’s rank correlation and concordance correlation. NRS estimates were moderately correlated with calf rumination behaviour as measured from video observations but underestimated the duration of time spent ruminating by approximately 76%. Perhaps the calves’ rumination movements were too subtle for the NRS to detect, or the NRS needed a different placement on the calf’s small neck to record the behaviour accurately. Although automatic recordings from PLF tools may save observation time, our results indicate that the NRS may not yet accurately detect rumination behaviour in pre-weaned dairy calves.

Information

Type
Research Communication
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Borchers, MR, Chang, YM, Tsai, IC, Wadsworth, BA and Bewley, JM (2016) A validation of technologies monitoring dairy cow feeding, ruminating, and lying behaviors. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 74587466.10.3168/jds.2015-10843CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borchers, MR, Gavigan, S, Harbers, A and Bewley, J (2021) An evaluation of a novel device for measuring eating, rumination, and inactive behaviors in lactating Holstein dairy cattle. Animal 15, 100008.10.1016/j.animal.2020.100008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burfeind, O, Schirmann, K, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Veira, DM, Weary, DM and Heuwieser, W (2011) Technical note: evaluation of a system for monitoring rumination in heifers and calves. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 426430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elischer, MF, Arceo, ME, Karcher, EL and Siegford, JM (2013) Validating the accuracy of activity and rumination monitor data from dairy cows housed in a pasture-based automatic milking system. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 64126422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friard, O and Gamba, M (2016) BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7, 13251330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, TM, Suarez-Mena, FX, Hu, W, Dennis, TS, Schlotterbeck, RL, Timms, LL and Hulbert, LE (2017) Technical Note: evaluation of an ear-attached movement sensor to record rumination, eating, and activity behaviors in 1-month-old calves. The Professional Animal Scientist 33, 743747.10.15232/pas.2017-01623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, GM, Heins, BJ and Endres, MI (2018) Technical note: validation of an ear-tag accelerometer sensor to determine rumination, eating, and activity behaviors of grazing dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 24922495.10.3168/jds.2016-12534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schirmann, K, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Weary, DM, Veira, DM and Heuwieser, W (2009) Technical note: validation of a system for monitoring rumination in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 60526055.10.3168/jds.2009-2361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schober, P, Boer, C and Schwarte, LA (2018) Correlation Coefficients: appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia 126, 17631768.10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, S, Diao, QY, Hu, FM, Bi, YL, Piao, MY, Jiang, LS, Sun, F, Li, H and Tu, Y (2022) Development of ruminating behavior in Holstein calves between birth and 30 days of age. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 572584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weary, DM, Huzzey, JM and von Keyserlingk, MA (2009) Board-invited review: using behavior to predict and identify ill health in animals. Journal of Animal Science 87, 770777.10.2527/jas.2008-1297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed