Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-28T13:26:23.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A community participatory approach to enhancing capacity in patient-centered alcohol research: Bridging translational science and empowering women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2025

Pravesh Sharma*
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI, US
Hannah Kolarik
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin, Wausau, WI, US
Christopher Plapparampil Benny
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin, Wausau, WI, US
Brianna N. Tranby
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
Tessa Vance
Affiliation:
Wisconsin Women’s Health Foundation, Madison, WI, US
Tommi Thompson
Affiliation:
Wisconsin Women’s Health Foundation, Madison, WI, US
Kasey R. Boehmer
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
Alanna M. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
Christi A. Patten
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
*
Corresponding author: P. Sharma; Email: sharma.pravesh@mayo.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alcohol misuse among women has risen compared to men. Women experience barriers to engaging in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (CER) that, in turn, limits the evidence base for addressing alcohol misuse in this population. In this manuscript, we describe WomenWise, a community-partnered project and outline how we co-developed community focused CER training curriculum and collaboratively planned future partnered learning sessions (PLSs) with Community Advisory Board (CAB) feedback. Through this approach we aim to empower women to contribute to future patient-centered CER and enhance the stakeholder capacity for future patient-centered research.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), which permits re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for Clinical and Translational Science

Introduction

Excessive use of alcohol (or alcohol misuse) [1] is a critical public health concern in the United States, contributing to significant medical and psychiatric morbidity and mortality [Reference Puddephatt, Irizar, Jones, Gage and Goodwin24]. A significant disparity exists among women themselves, adding to the overall complexity of alcohol misuse. According to the 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), [5] approximately 8.7% of women in the U.S. met the criteria for alcohol use disorder (AUD) in the past year. When examined by race and ethnicity, prevalence was highest among American Indian or Alaska Native women (13.6%), followed by White (11.6%), Black (10.5%), Hispanic (10.1%), and Asian women (6.1%). Recent trends also point to a troubling rise in alcohol misuse among younger women: 31.6% of women aged 18 to 25 reported binge drinking, exceeding the rate observed in their male peers. The evidence also shows that women with lower income or educational attainment are more likely to develop alcohol-related medical conditions than those with greater socioeconomic advantage. [Reference Edwards, Lonn and Chartier6] These findings highlight the role of structural inequities that are rooted in socioeconomic position and demographic factors in shaping risks and disproportionately burdening vulnerable subgroups of women.

Furthermore, longitudinal studies have documented that women experience more significant alcohol-related adverse consequences compared to men, including increased rates of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and deaths related to alcohol misuse [Reference White7]. The complex interplay of social, logistical, and awareness-related factors can explain this emerging trend. For example, compared to men, women experience added caregiver responsibilities and are labeled negatively (“bad character”) for using alcohol. Women are often unaware of the harmful effects of alcohol specific to their sex, such as higher blood alcohol concentration compared to men with the same amount of alcohol consumption [Reference Baraona, Abittan and Dohmen8]. These factors independently or interactively influence women’s ability to seek and access alcohol treatment [Reference McCaul, Roach, Hasin, Weisner, Chang and Sinha9].

Patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (CER) focuses on research questions and outcomes that matter most to patients and their communities. It emphasizes working alongside people with lived experience—through co-learning, shared decision-making, and collaboration that starts with shaping the research question and extends all the way through how findings are shared. [Reference Slutsky and Clancy10] This approach is especially important for women with alcohol misuse, given the treatment disparities they continue to face and the limited inclusion of their voices in traditional research models. [Reference McCaul, Roach, Hasin, Weisner, Chang and Sinha9,Reference Barrio and Gual11]

Unfortunately, minimal comparative and patient-centered CER exists in the treatment of women’s alcohol misuse [Reference Bibbins-Domingo and Helman12]. The gap stems from historical biases that have prioritized men-focused studies, as well as barriers to research participation that mirror those affecting treatment access [Reference Bibbins-Domingo, Helman and Bibbins-Domingo13]. Further, the limited use of community-engaged research among women has resulted in a lack of patient-centered methodology, which hinders the incorporation of research findings into the settings where women seek clinical care and community-based support interventions [Reference Schick, Spillane and Hostetler14].

To address the underrepresentation of women in patient-centered CER on alcohol misuse treatment, our project takes a community participatory approach to build a network of women stakeholders (large non-profit organizations, faith leaders, women with lived experiences) known as WomenWise (Figure 1). The objective of this network is to strengthen the capacity of women stakeholders by equipping them with knowledge of sex disparities in alcohol misuse treatment and engaging them in future patient-centered CER methodologies. Our current paper outlines this approach.

Figure 1. Community participatory capacity building plan for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (CER). N: expected number of PLS attendees Abbreviations: CER=comparative effectiveness research; PLS= Partnered learning sessions; PPT= PowerPoint.

Methods

The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board deemed this capacity building project “not research.”

Project design and setting

This project was conducted at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) and the Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, with the involvement of community members. The project design is highlighted in Figure 1.

Community advisory board (CABs)

A community advisory board (CAB) of 17 women stakeholders was formed to achieve the project goals representing non-profit organizations (NPOs) across the United States (Rural Minds [15], National Grange [16], The Wisconsin Women’s Health Foundation [17], and The National Network of Depression Centers [18], faith-based organizations (churches), persons and family members with lived experience, health professionals, and Mayo Clinic Connect (Mayo Clinic Social Network [19]). Stakeholders were recruited through trusted community networks, clinical referrals, and outreach to local groups whose missions align with the goals of WomenWise.

Stakeholder Training and Curriculum Development Process

Training of Stakeholders

Our project team included a panel of experts from across the Mayo Clinic enterprise with expertise in rural health, healthcare disparities, alcohol use treatment, clinical care, and patient advocacy. The panel curated the preliminary items (“PPT-1”) to educate CAB members about (1) sex-specific alcohol harms, (2) disparities in alcohol treatment access in women, and (3) foundational research concepts (including patient-centered research and CER) based on existing literature, and (4) insights from the panel’s collective experience working with diverse communities. A stepwise consensus process strategy [Reference Gottlieb, Caretta-Weyer, Chan and Humphrey-Murto20] informed the refinement of the training material to ensure the inclusion of the most relevant information for the priority population. The training was delivered online to CAB members through a PowerPoint presentation via Zoom [21] by the lead author (PS) across three 90-minute sessions.

Curriculum Development (“PPT-2”)

Equipped with knowledge of alcohol treatment barriers in women, and with foundational understanding of patient-centered and CER, the trained CAB members further refined the original curriculum (“PPT-1”) tailored to the priority population (women with alcohol misuse) for future partnered learning sessions (PLSs). During this phase, we facilitated co-learning and elevated community partners’ insights, ensuring decisions centered on CAB members’ lived experiences and priorities. These sessions (PLSs) are scheduled to occur at each of the five stakeholder organizations (N = 5) and will be led by a CAB member from the respective organization. Each PLS will have ten individuals recruited from each stakeholder’s organization who represent the priority population. Therefore, N = 50 individuals will be “heard and trained” through the PLSs. This curriculum developed for PLSs particularly included common questions that patients and their families experience about patient-centered CER, e.g., (1) What are the expectations in CER, (2) How to share lived experience in CER, and (3) How to partner with researchers. The CAB members utilized their background, expertise, and knowledge to ensure the PPT-2 was succinct yet informative, culturally relevant, and aligned with the project topic. We obtained structured cognitive interview feedback on each slide of the PPT-1 through discussions and group interactions among CAB members. During the discussion, each slide was displayed, and members provided feedback on content, flow, understandability, and relevance. Members also had the opportunity to provide open-ended feedback. Participants received a $150 honorarium for each meeting. Meetings were recorded and the CAB coordinator took detailed notes. The PLSs are scheduled for May–November 2025.

Evaluation

The senior authors (PS and CP) constructed a self-assessment questionnaire for CAB members, which was distributed to every member after each research basics session. The CAB members were required to achieve a score of 80% or better to advance to the next step. A content analysis approach [Reference Hsieh and Shannon22] was used to categorize detailed notes gathered during the CAB meetings. The CAB group dynamic was self-evaluated by CAB members using a Likert scale with response options of “Agree,” “Not Sure,” and “Disagree.” In December, CAB members completed a midpoint survey assessing intervention acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, AIM; 3 items), appropriateness (Intervention Appropriateness Measure, IAM; 4 items), and feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure, FIM; 4 items), using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). [Reference Weiner, Lewis and Stanick23].

Results

Quantitative results

The training session results indicated strong performance by the CAB members in both “Research Basics I” and “Research Basics II.” In both sessions, with 11 participants in each, the mean scores were 98 and 96%, respectively. Additionally, 9 participants scored 100% in “Research Basics I,” and 8 participants have a hundred percent score in “Research Basics II.” These results indicate excellent training delivery and high participant interaction. Eight CAB members completed the midpoint feedback survey which included measures of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. The responses demonstrated a high level of endorsement across all three domains. The overall average score across respondents was 4.36 (range: 3.55–5.00), indicating general agreement that the WomenWise approach is acceptable, feasible, and appropriate. Item-level scores ranged from a mean of 4.13 for statements such as “The approach is appealing to me” and “The approach seems easy to use,” to 4.50 for items including “I welcome this approach,” “The approach seems applicable,” and “The approach seems implementable.”

Qualitative results

Overall feedback

A key takeaway from the community-based feedback was the need to enhance the curriculum to better address stigma (e.g., removing stigmatizing words such as “AUD” and replacing it with “alcohol misuse”) while ensuring it remains concise yet comprehensive in conveying essential concepts of patient-centered CER. A great deal of discussion focused on the format of content to meet the priority population’s overall health literacy. Additionally, CAB members refined the open-ended questions for PLSs to foster a sense of empowerment and encourage non-judgmental dialogues, focusing on:

  • Exploring perceptions of alcohol misuse and sex-specific disparities in treatment

  • Discussing potential solutions and priorities to address the root causes of treatment disparities

  • Identifying priority topics for future CER.

Major themes

The content analysis resulted in three major themes of (1) clarity and consistency, (2) organization and flow, and (3) non-stigmatizing language (Table 1).

Table 1. The table demonstrates the CAB feedback and changes made to the partnered learning session curriculum

CAB= Community Advisory Board.

Clarity and consistency

The most common theme was to ensure that the PLS curriculum was simple and used clear language, allowing all attendees, regardless of background, to understand the content. Given that the scope of the project is limited to biological females, it was suggested to replace “gender” with “sex” to avoid confusion regarding the characteristics of the priority population. Finally, CAB emphasized standardizing punctuation, fonts, and layout.

Organization and Flow

The members suggested including an agenda slide to establish expectations, followed by a logical progression from the introduction to alcohol abuse in women, research gaps, solutions through treatment, research basics, and finally, how the PLS attendees contribute to WomenWise with each section preceded by a transition slide. The CAB expressed the need to remove complex terminologies (e.g., changing “stakeholders” to “community members” or “partners,” changing “disparities” to “differences in access to care,” “disseminate and implement” to “share and put into practice” and similar phrases) and break down “busy” slides into smaller and easily conceivable bullet points. Other common feedback from CAB under this theme was to use pictures, animations, and infographics where possible to gauge attendees’ interest and assist in learning.

Non-Stigmatizing language

The CAB suggested the importance of eliminating language that could trigger some individuals who have a traumatic and adverse relationship with alcohol. For example, replacing stigmatizing terminologies such as “addiction,” “disorder,” and “problem” with “misuse.” In addition, “exclusion” (pertaining to exclusion criteria), was perceived negative, as if people are being left out unfairly. The CAB members suggested using more neutral phrasing that explains eligibility without implying rejection and suggested rewording: “Factors that make someone ineligible for a study.”

As far as the CAB group dynamic was concerned, 100% agreed that members respected each other’s opinions, and the facilitator ensured that all opinions were considered. In a CAB member feedback survey, 100% of respondents reported agreement with the WomenWise project approach (training stakeholders and conducting PLS) to increase the capacity of the priority population by educating them in patient-centered CER. The CAB responded that the WomenWise approach to educating people in patient-centered comparative research is implementable and applicable.

Discussion

Through this community participatory project, we trained community stakeholders in patient-centered CER and empowered them to develop a new curriculum tailored for the local community members whom they represent. CAB members found the WomenWise strategy to be implementable, with high levels of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. The stakeholders will take on leadership roles in their organization to further educate their members—who represent our priority population—about CER and encourage their participation in future patient-centered CER.

The CAB is not just involved in building the PLS curriculum, but each member also represents their home organizations. In this role, they are encouraged to lead within their networks, share what they’ve learned, and empower others in their organization to engage in patient-centered CER. CAB members also serve as points of contact for PLS participants from the same organization for future follow-ups. PLS attendees will be added to the WomenWise database for future CER opportunities. This structure reinforces ongoing involvement and creates a foundation for sustained engagement, knowledge sharing, and empowerment that grows from within the community. Finally, we plan to organize large-scale community events to share experiences from the WomenWise project and create new avenues for participation in patient-centered CER.

The CAB feedback (Themes 1 and 2) incorporated into the presentation material was not merely aesthetic but intentionally aimed at improving usability and actionability. Simplifying wording and improving presentation flow were key to enhancing understanding, especially for participants with limited exposure to research concepts. CAB members emphasized using plain language (at an 8th-grade reading level) and incorporating infographics to make content more accessible and shareable. They shared personal stories, noting that intellectually heavy or technical language in community-facing presentations is often poorly received. Audiences may disengage or leave early, undermining capacity-building efforts. By providing simplified, accessible materials, we aim to build the confidence of lay facilitators as they step into leadership roles. These adjustments align with the broader community-participatory goal of “meeting the community where they are,” which fosters trust, cultural humility, and a sense of ownership—factors critical to capacity-building.

Through this project, we aim to take several future steps that align with our medium-term goal of expanding WomenWise and our long-term goal of encouraging WomenWise and other community members exposed to WomenWise to engage in patient-centered CER. Ultimately, we envision that WomenWise will collaborate with other researchers in our enterprise to engage in patient-centered CER based on their interests and lived experiences.

Our project has some limitations. Firstly, there was a lack of demographic diversity in the CAB as we only had one person of color (Black), however, we included women from diverse backgrounds and various regions across the U.S. Secondly, the overwhelmingly positive response of CAB members could be due to social desirability bias [Reference Bergen and Labonte24] and a desire to align with the facilitator’s opinion. We tried to limit this bias by asking for feedback anonymously and requesting open-ended feedback as well.

This community participatory capacity-building project successfully met key milestones, including demonstrating a feasible community engagement approach to developing easy-to-understand patient-centered CER information materials for the community. In addition, the NPO representative felt empowered to take leadership roles in disseminating the knowledge acquired during this project, further strengthening the capacity of WomenWise.

Our project has practical implications. The findings offer an actionable framework for others looking to engage women and diverse community members in patient-centered CER. The stepwise, co-developed process we used can be adapted by other researchers or practitioners working in similar settings. Most importantly, it shows that when communities help draft the content, the results are not only culturally relevant but may enhance long-term sustainability.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the members of our community advisory boards and community participants.

Author contributions

Pravesh Sharma: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing-original draft; Hannah Kolarik: Writing-original draft; Christopher Benny: Writing-original draft; Brianna Tranby: Methodology, Writing-review & editing; Tessa Vance: Writing-review & editing; Tommi Thompson: Writing-review & editing; Kasey Bohemer: Writing-review & editing; Alanna Chamberlain: Writing-review & editing; Christi Patten: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision.

Funding statement

This work was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Engagement Award (EACB-35102). PI: Pravesh Sharma.

Competing interests

None

References

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. What is Alcohol Misuse? U.S. Department of health and human services, (https://rethinkingdrinking.niaaa.nih.gov/how-much-too-much/what-alcohol-misuse) Accessed March 12, 2025.Google Scholar
Puddephatt, JA, Irizar, P, Jones, A, Gage, SH, Goodwin, L. Associations of common mental disorder with alcohol use in the adult general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2022;117(6):15431572. doi: 10.1111/add.15735.Google Scholar
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Medical complications: Common alcohol-related concerns, National Institutes of Health., (https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/health-professionals-communities/core-resource-on-alcohol/medical-complications-common-alcohol-related-concerns), Accessed March 12, 2025.Google Scholar
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Understanding alcohol drinking patterns National Institutes of Health (https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohols-effects-health/alcohol-drinking-patterns) Accessed March 12, 2025.Google Scholar
SAMHSA. Center for behavioral health statistics and quality-national survey on drug use and health. Table 5.9A—Alcohol use disorder in past year: Among people aged 12 or older; by age group and demographic characteristics, numbers in thousands (https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-nsduh-detailed-tables) Accessed August 2, 2024.Google Scholar
Edwards, A, Lonn, S, Chartier, K, et al.. Socioeconomic position indicators and risk of alcohol-related medical conditions: A national cohort study from Sweden. PLoS Med. 2024;21(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004359.Google Scholar
White, AM. Gender differences in the Epidemiology of Alcohol Use and Related Harms in the United States. Alcohol Res. 2020;40(2):01. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v40.2.01.Google Scholar
Baraona, E, Abittan, CS, Dohmen, K, et al. Gender differences in pharmacokinetics of alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;25(4):502507.Google Scholar
McCaul, ME, Roach, D, Hasin, DS, Weisner, C, Chang, G, Sinha, R. Alcohol and women: a brief overview. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(5):774779. doi: 10.1111/acer.13985.Google Scholar
Slutsky, JR, Clancy, CM. Patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: essential for high-quality care. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(5):403404. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.5.Google Scholar
Barrio, P, Gual, A. Patient-centered care interventions for the management of alcohol use disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:18231845. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S109641.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Policy and Global Affairs, Committee on Women in Science Engineering, and Medicine. Committee on improving the representation of women and underrepresented minorities in clinical trials and research. In: Bibbins-Domingo, K, Helman, A, eds. Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research: Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups, The National Academies Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Bibbins-Domingo, K, Helman, A, Bibbins-Domingo, KHA. Improving representation in clinical trials and research: building research equity for women and underrepresented groups, National Academies Press (US),2022.Google Scholar
Schick, MR, Spillane, NS, Hostetler, KL. A call to action: a systematic review examining the failure to include females and members of minoritized racial/Ethnic groups in clinical trials of Pharmacological Treatments for Alcohol Use Disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020;44(10):19331951. doi: 10.1111/acer.14440.Google Scholar
Rural Minds. Managing rural isolation + loneliness. Rural MInds (https://www.ruralminds.org/) Accessed March 12, 2025.Google Scholar
Grange National. National grange of the order of patrons of husbandry. The national grange (https://www.nationalgrange.org/) Accessed March 10, 2025.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Womens Health Foundation. Wisconsin Women’s Health Foundation (https://wwhf.org/) Accessed March 12, 2025.Google Scholar
National Network of Depression Centers, National Network of Depression Centers (https://nndc.org/) Accessed March 12, 2025.Google Scholar
Clinic Mayo. Mayo clinic connect Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (https://connect.mayoclinic.org/) Accessed March 12, 2025.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, M, Caretta-Weyer, H, Chan, TM, Humphrey-Murto, S. Educator’s blueprint: a primer on consensus methods in medical education research. AEM Educ Train Aug. 2023;7(4):e10891. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10891.Google Scholar
Zoom. Work happy with an AI-first work platform for human connection, Zoom Communications, Inc (https://www.zoom.com/) Accessed March 12, 2025.Google Scholar
Hsieh, HF, Shannon, SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):12771288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.Google Scholar
Weiner, BJ, Lewis, CC, Stanick, C, et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.Google Scholar
Bergen, N, Labonte, R. Everything is perfect, and we have no problems’: detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(5):783792. doi: 10.1177/1049732319889354.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Community participatory capacity building plan for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (CER). N: expected number of PLS attendees Abbreviations: CER=comparative effectiveness research; PLS= Partnered learning sessions; PPT= PowerPoint.

Figure 1

Table 1. The table demonstrates the CAB feedback and changes made to the partnered learning session curriculum