Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T22:14:27.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ontogenesis of speech acts*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Jerome S. Bruner
Jerome S. Bruner
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A speech act approach to the transition from pre-linguistic to linguistic communication is adopted in order to consider language in relation to behaviour generally and to allow for an emphasis on the USE of language rather than on its form. The structure of language is seen as non-arbitrary in that it reflects both attention structures (via predication) and action structures (via the fundamental case grammatical form of language). Linguistic concepts are first realized in action. A pilot study focusing on the regulation of JOINT attention and JOINT activity within the context of mutuality between mother and infant is discussed, with emphasis on ritualization in mutual play as a vehicle for understanding the development of the formal structures of language.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1975 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1971). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1970). Learning to talk: A cross-linguistic study of early syntactic development with special reference to Finnish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Brackbill, Y. (1967). The use of social reinforcement in conditioning smiling. In Brack-bill, Y. & Thompson, G. C. (eds), Behavior in infancy and early childhood. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Berko, J. (1960). Word association and the acquisition of grammar. ChDev 31. 1–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. S. (1972). Nature and uses of immaturity. AmPsych. 27. 687–708.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1974). Organisation of early skilled action. In Richards, M. P. M. (ed.), The integration of a child into a social world. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J. & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1973). Play with language and metalinguistic awareness: one dimension of language experience. Paper presented at the Second Lucy Sprague Mitchell Memorial Conference at the Bank Street College of Education, May.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Collis, G. M. & Schaffer, H. R. (1974). Synchronization of visual attention in mother-infant pairs. (Mimeo).Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1974 a). The development of language and cognition: the cognition hypothesis. In Foss, B. (ed.) New perspectives in child development. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1974 b). An experimental investigation of a putative linguistic universal: marking and the indirect object. (Mimeo).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, J. (in press). The development of speech acts. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Elkonin, D. B. (1971). Development of speech. In Zaporozhets, A. V. & Elkonin, D. B. (eds), The psychology of preschool children. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M., Smith, J. H. & Laufer, B. (in press). Communication and the beginnings of language: the development of semantic structure in one-word speech and beyond. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1967). Logic and conversation. Unpublished manuscript of William James Lectures, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1968). Utterer's meaning, sentence-meaning and word-meaning. FL 4. 225–42.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1963). The problem of universals in language. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1963). Implications of language universals for linguistics. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1972). Collected papers. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.Google Scholar
de Laguna, G. (1927). Speech: its function and development. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Mackworth, N. H. & Bruner, J. S. (1970). How adults and children search and recognize pictures. HumDev 13. 149–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Maratos, O. (1973). Development of imitation. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Conference.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1974) Semiotic extension. Paper presented at the Loyola Symposium on Cognition,Chicago,April.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Dev. 38 (1–2; Serial No. 149).Google Scholar
Reynolds, P. C. (in press). Play, language and human evolution. In Bruner, J., Jolly, A. & Sylva, K. (eds), Play: its role in evolution and development. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. L., Gewirtz, J. & Ross, H. (1959). Social conditioning of vocalizations in the infant. JCompPhysiolPsych 52. 68–73.Google Scholar
Robson, K. S. (1967). The role of eye-to-eye contact in maternal-infant attachment. Child Research Branch, NIMH, Bethesda, Maryland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J. (1974). Early language development. In Richards, M. P. M. (ed.), The integration of a child into a social world. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1974). Relational concepts underlying language. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition, retardation and intervention. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair-de-Zwart, H. (1969). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Elkind, D. & Flavell, J. H. (eds), Studies in cognitive development: essays in honor of Jean Piaget. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds), The genesis of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1959). Persons. Chapter 3 of Individuals. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sugarman, S. (1973). A description of communicative development in the pre-language child. Unpublished thesis, Hampshire College.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1974). Infant response to objects and persons. Paper presented at the Spring meeting of the British Psychological Society, Bangor.Google Scholar
Ullman, S. (1963). Semantic universals. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar