Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T00:09:23.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

If I were you and you were me: the analysis of pronouns in a pronoun-reversing child*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Shulamuth Chiat
Shulamuth Chiat
Affiliation:
School for the Study of Disorders of Human Communication
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An investigation into the pronoun distribution of a pronoun-reversing child reveals inconsistencies both within production and between production and comprehension. This distribution is compatible with some analyses of normal pronoun development and pronoun reversal which have attributed non-adult person distinctions to the child. However, the data are also compatible with a quite distinct hypothesis which postulates that the child's pronouns are plurifunctional: the unreversed pronouns encode full adult distinctions, and are independent of the reversed pronouns, which function to shift perspective. The evaluation of these hypotheses and the questions they raise for normal and pathological pronoun development are discussed.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 359 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

I am indebted to Maria Black, for drawing my attention to Matthew and for discussing the data; to Lynden and Roger Parker for sharing my interest in their son's pronouns; to Chris and Uta Frith for assistance with the statistical analysis; to Jean Aitchison for the title; and to Fay Chiat for typing. Address for correspondence: School for the Study of Disorders of Human Communication, 86 Blackfriars Road, London SEI 8HA.

References

REFERENCES

Charney, R. (1980). Speech roles and the development of personal pronouns. JChLang 7. 509–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Chiat, S. (1981). Context-specificity and generalization in the acquisition of pronominal distinctions. JChLang 8. 75–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1977). From gesture to word: on the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In Bruner, J. S. & Garton, A. (eds), Human growth and development: Wolf son College lectures 1976. Oxford: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Clark, R. (1974). Performing without competence. JChLang 1. 1–10.Google Scholar
Cooley, C. H. (1908). A study of the early use of self-words by a child. PsychRev 15. 339–57.Google Scholar
Deutsch, W. & Pechmann, T. (1978). Ihr, dir or mir? On the acquisition of pronouns in German children. Cognition 6. 155–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jespersen, O. (1922). Language: its nature, development, and origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Shipley, E. F. & Shipley, T. E. (1969). Quaker children's use of Thee: a relational analysis. JVLVB. 112–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar