Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-bslzr Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-03-15T00:33:46.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How early do children understand gesture–speech combinations with iconic gestures?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2013

CARMEN STANFIELD ,
REBECCA WILLIAMSON  and
ŞEYDA ÖZÇALIŞKAN
CARMEN STANFIELD
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
REBECCA WILLIAMSON
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
ŞEYDA ÖZÇALIŞKAN*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
*
Address for correspondence: Şeyda Özçalişkan, Georgia State University, Department of Psychology, PO Box 5010, Atlanta, GA 30302-5010. tel: (404) 413 6282; e-mail: seyda@gsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children understand gesture+speech combinations in which a deictic gesture adds new information to the accompanying speech by age 1;6 (Morford & Goldin-Meadow, 1992; ‘push’+point at ball). This study explores how early children understand gesture+speech combinations in which an iconic gesture conveys additional information not found in the accompanying speech (e.g., ‘read’+BOOK gesture). Our analysis of two- to four-year-old children's responses in a gesture+speech comprehension task showed that children grasp the meaning of iconic co-speech gestures by age three and continue to improve their understanding with age. Overall, our study highlights the important role gesture plays in language comprehension as children learn to unpack increasingly complex communications addressed to them at the early ages.

Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 462 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

We thank Georgia State University's Area of Focus Initiative: Research on the Challenges of Acquiring Language & Literacy for providing an undergraduate research fellowship to Carmen Stanfield, and the participating families.

References

REFERENCES

Butterworth, G. E. & Grover, L. (1988). The origins of referential communication in human infancy. In Weiskrantz, L. (ed.), Thought without language, 5–24. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (2006). Why verbs are hard to learn. In Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Michnick Golinkoff, R. (eds.), Action meets word: how children learn verbs, 544–64. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: how our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Butcher, C. (2003). Pointing toward two-word speech in young children. In Kita, S. (ed.), Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet, 85–107. New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. & Smith, J. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M., Lyn, H. & Savage-Rumbaugh, S. (2008). Protolanguage in ontogeny and phylogeny: combining deixis and representation. Interaction Studies 9, 34–50.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O. & Caselli, M. C. (1994). From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive Development 9, 23–43.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Longobardi, E. & Caselli, M. C. (1999). Gesturing in mother–child interactions. Cognitive Development 14, 57–75.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science 16, 367–71.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. D. (2001). Broadening the units of analysis in communication: speech and nonverbal behaviors in pragmatic comprehension. Journal of Child Language 28, 325–49.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A. & Maris, E. (2010). Two sides of the same coin: speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science 21, 260–67.Google Scholar
Kita, S. & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48, 16–32.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992) Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morford, M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1992). Comprehension and production of gesture in combination with speech in one-word speakers. Journal of Child Language 9, 559–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namy, L. L. (2001). What's in a name when it isn't a word? 17-month-olds' mapping of nonverbal symbols to object categories. Infancy 2, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namy, L. L., Campbell, A. L. & Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: a U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development 5, 37–57.Google Scholar
Namy, L. L. & Waxman, S. R. (1998). Words and gestures: infants' interpretations of different forms of symbolic reference. Child Development 69, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicoladis, E., Mayberry, R. I. & Genesee, F. (1999). Gesture and early bilingual development. Developmental Psychology 35, 514–26.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2013). Do iconic gestures pave the way for children's early verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics. Available on CJO. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000720.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005a). Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition 96, 101–13.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005b). Do parents lead their children by the hand? Journal of Child Language 32, 481–505.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). When gesture–speech combinations do and do not index linguistic change. Language and Cognitive Processes 28, 190–217.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Sex differences in language first appear in gesture. Developmental Science 13, 752–60.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Is there an iconic gesture spurt at 26 months? In Stam, Gale & Ishino, Mika (eds.), Integrating gestures: the interdisciplinary nature of gesture, 163–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stites, L. J. & Özçalişkan, Ş. (2012). Narrative perspective appears first in gesture. Poster presented at the 37th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar