Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-wjqwx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-10T18:05:22.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children with Specific Language Impairment in Finnish: the use of tense and agreement inflections*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

SARI KUNNARI ,
TUULA SAVINAINEN-MAKKONEN ,
LAURENCE B. LEONARD ,
LEENA MÄKINEN ,
ANNA-KAISA TOLONEN ,
MIRJA LUOTONEN  and
EEVA LEINONEN
SARI KUNNARI*
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Finland
TUULA SAVINAINEN-MAKKONEN
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Finland
LAURENCE B. LEONARD
Affiliation:
Purdue University, USA
LEENA MÄKINEN
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Finland
ANNA-KAISA TOLONEN
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Finland
MIRJA LUOTONEN
Affiliation:
Oulu University Hospital, Finland
EEVA LEINONEN
Affiliation:
King's College, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Sari Kunnari, Faculty of Humanities, Logopedics, PO Box 1000, FI-90014University of Oulu, Finland. e-mail: sari.kunnari@oulu.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children with specific language impairment (SLI) vary widely in their ability to use tense/agreement inflections depending on the type of language being acquired, a fact that current accounts of SLI have tried to explain. Finnish provides an important test case for these accounts because: (1) verbs in the first and second person permit null subjects whereas verbs in the third person do not; and (2) tense and agreement inflections are agglutinating and thus one type of inflection can appear without the other. Probes were used to compare the verb inflection use of Finnish-speaking children with SLI, and both age-matched and younger typically developing children. The children with SLI were less accurate, and the pattern of their errors did not match predictions based on current accounts of SLI. It appears that children with SLI have difficulty learning complex verb inflection paradigms apart from any problem specific to tense and agreement.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 38 , Issue 5 , November 2011 , pp. 999 - 1027
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

The research reported here was supported by research grant R01 DC00458 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health and by the Academy of Finland. We wish to thank the families for participating in the project and Patricia Deevy for her helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

REFERENCES

Aksu-Koç, A., Ketrez, F. N., Laalo, K. & Pfeifer, B. (2007). Agglutinating languages: Turkish, Finnish, and Yucatec Matya. In Laaha, S. & Gillis, S. (eds), Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology, 47–57. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, 112.Google Scholar
Bartke, S. (1994). Dissociations in SLI children's inflectional morphology: New evidence from agreement inflections and noun plurals in German. Paper presented at the Meeting of the European Group for Child Language Disorders, Garderen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bedore, L. & Leonard, L. (2001). Grammatical morphology deficits in Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 905–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedore, L. & Leonard, L. (2005). Verb inflections and noun phrase morphology in the spontaneous speech of Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 26, 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1992). The underlying nature of specific language impairment. Child Psychology and Psychiatry 33, 3–66.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.23). www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Bortolini, U., Caselli, M. C. & Leonard, L. (1997). Grammatical deficits in Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, 809–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dasinger, L. (1997). Issues in the acquisition of Estonian, Finnish, and Hungarian: A crosslinguistic comparison. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 4, 1–86. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
de Jong, J. (1999). Specific language impairment in Dutch: Inflectional morphology and argument structure. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 28.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (2007). Introduction. In Laaha, S. & Gillis, S. (eds), Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology, 3–9. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Edwards, S., Fletcher, P., Garman, M., Hughes, A., Letts, C. & Sinka, I. (1997). Reynell Developmental Language Scales III. Windsor: NFER Nelson [Translation and standardization of the Finnish version: Psykologien Kustannus Oy, 2001].Google Scholar
Ellis Weismer, S. & Thordardottir, E. T. (2002). Cognition and language. In Accardo, P., Capute, A. & Rogers, B. (eds), Disorders of language development, 21–37. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Gillam, R., Montgomery, J. & Gillam, S. (2008). Attention and memory in child language disorders. In Schwartz, R. (ed.), Handbook of child language disorders. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Graf Estes, K., Evans, J. & Else-Quest, N. (2007). Differences in the nonword repetition performance of children with and without specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 177–195.Google Scholar
Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U. & Leonard, L. (2000). Specific language impairment in Swedish: The status of verb morphology and word order. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43, 848–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, F. (1999). Finnish: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. (2006). Finnish. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kunnari, S. (2002). Word length in Finnish. First Language 22, 119–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laalo, L. (1999). Ensisanoista ja esimorfologiasta varhaismorfologiaan [From first words and premorphology to protomorphology]. Virittäjä 3, 354–75.Google Scholar
Latomaa, S. & Nuolijärvi, P. (2002). The language situation in Finland. Current Issues in Language Planning 3, 95–202.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (2000). Specific language impairment across languages. In Bishop, D. & Leonard, L. (eds), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention, and outcome, 115–29. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (2007). Processing limitations and the grammatical profile of children with specific language impairment. In Kail, R. (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 35, 139–71. New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L., Eyer, J., Bedore, L. & Grela, B. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 40, 741–53.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Sabbadini, L., Leonard, J. & Volterra, V. (1987). Specific language impairment in children: A crosslinguistic study. Brain and Language 32, 233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, Á., Leonard, L., Kas, B. & Pléh, C. (2009). The use of tense and agreement by Hungarian-speaking children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 98–117.Google Scholar
Mantila, H. (2004). Murre ja identiteetti [Dialect and identity]. Virittäjä 3, 322–46.Google Scholar
Nieminen, L. (2007). A complex case: A morphosyntactic approach to complexity in early child language. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 72.Google Scholar
Norbury, C. F., Bishop, D. V. M. & Briscoe, J. (2001). Production of English finite verb morphology: A comparison of SLI and mild-moderate hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 165–78.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Noll, K. R. & Grimm, H. (1997). An extended optional infinitive stage in German-speaking children with specific language impairment. Language Acquisition 6, 255–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. & Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 39, 1239–57.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Wexler, K. & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41, 1412–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saaristo-Helin, K., Savinainen-Makkonen, T. & Kunnari, S. (2006). The phonological mean length of utterance: Methodological challenges from a crosslinguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language 33, 179–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2000). Learning long words – A typological perspective. Language and Speech 43, 205–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suomi, K., Toivanen, J. & Ylitalo, R. (2008). Finnish sound structure: Phonetics, phonology, phonotactics, and prosody. Oulu: Oulu University Press.Google Scholar
Toivainen, J. (1997). The acquisition of Finnish. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 4, 87–182. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vainikka, A. & Levy, Y. (1999). Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17, 613–71.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1995). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – Revised. New York: NCS Pearson [Translation and standardization of the Finnish version: Psykologien Kustannus Oy, 1995].Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint. Lingua 106, 23–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (2003). Lenneberg's dream: Learning, normal language development, and specific language impairment: In Levy, Y. & Schaeffer, J. (eds), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment, 11–61. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar