Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T03:51:23.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The acquisition of noun inflection in Northern Pame (Xi'iuy): Comparing whole word and minimal word accounts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2020

Clifton PYE ,
Scott BERTHIAUME  and
Barbara PFEILER
Clifton PYE*
Affiliation:
The University of Kansas, USA
Scott BERTHIAUME
Affiliation:
Dallas International University, USA
Barbara PFEILER
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
*
*Corresponding author: Clifton Pye, University of Kansas - Department of Linguistics 1541 Lilac Lane, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 United States. E-mail: pyersqr@ku.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study used naturalistic data on the production of nominal prefixes in the Otopamean language Northern Pame (autonym: Xi'iuy) to test Whole Word (constructivist) and Minimal Word (prosodic) theories for the acquisition of inflection. Whole Word theories assume that children store words in their entirety; Minimal Word theories assume that children produce words as binary feet. Northern Pame uses obligatory portmanteaux prefixes to inflect nouns for class, number, animacy and possessor. Singular nouns constitute 90 percent of the nouns that the children hear and yet all five two-year-old children frequently omitted the singular noun prefixes, but produced the low frequency noun suffixes for dual and animate plural. Neither the children's production of the noun-class prefixes nor their prefix overextensions correlated with the adult type and token frequencies of production. Northern Pame children constructed Minimal Words that contain binary feet and disfavor the production of initial, extrametrical prefixes.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 48 , Issue 6 , November 2021 , pp. 1067 - 1100
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguado-Orea, J., & Pine, J. M. (2015). Comparing different models of the development of verb inflection in early child Spanish. Plos One 10(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42(2), 239–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2011). Child language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, J. (1995). The acquisition of stress. In Archibald, J. (Ed.), Phonological acquisition and phonological theory (pp. 81–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Avelino, H. (1997). Fonología y morfofonología del Pame Norte (M.A. thesis). México: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Avelino, H. (2002). Sandhi tonal en pame norte. Análisis fonológico y evidencia fonética’. In Levy, P. (Ed.), Del cora al maya yucateco. Estudios lingüísticos sobre algunas lenguas indígenas mexicanas (pp. 17–58). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Avelino, H. 2006. The typology of Pamean number systems and the limits of Mesoamerica as a linguistic area. Linguistic Typology 10(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltazar Hernández, F., Castillo Izaguirre, C., Castillo Izaguirre, D., González Valdez, E., & Hernández Gómez, A. (2007). Diccionario xi'iuy (pame norte). De los municipios de Tamasopo y Rayon, San Luis Potosí. San Luis Potosí: IIH.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. H., & Stemberger, J. P. (1998). Handbook of phonological development: From the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berthiaume, S. (2012). A Phonological Grammar of Northern Pame. SIL ebooks, 37. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Berthiaume, S. (2019). Prosody as seen in the morphological development of Northern Pame (Xi'iuy). DFW Metroplex Linguistics Conference, November 8, 2019, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5), 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2001 ). Phonology and language use. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, E. W. (2017). Otomanguean historical linguistics: Past, present, and prospects for the future. Language and Linguistics Compass 11(7) doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/Inc.3.12240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development 39, 433–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceitlin, S. N. (1988). Okkazional'nyje morfologičeskije formy v detskoj reči [Occasional morphological forms in child speech]. Leningrad: Leningrad Herzen State Pedagogical Institute Press.Google Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (2006). The patterns of consonantal acquisition and change in Chipewyan (Dëne Sųłiné). International Journal of American Linguistics, 72(2), 236–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. H., & Saville-Troike, M. (2002). Learning to construct verbs in Navajo and Quechua. Journal of Child Language 29, 623–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dąbrowska, E. (2004). Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish. Language and Cognitive Processes 19(2), 225–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2006). Low-level schemas or general rules? The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish case inflections. Language Sciences 28(1), 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Rapid learning of an abstract language-specific category: Polish children's acquisition of the instrumental construction. Journal of Child Language 35(3), 533–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de López, J. K. (1999). The acquisition of Zapotec body part locatives: a longitudinal case study. Paper presented at the International Congress for the Study of Child Language. San Sebastian, Spain.Google Scholar
de López, K. M. J. (2002). Baskets and Body-parts: A cross-cultural and crosslinguistic investigation of children's development of spatial cognition and language (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Denmark.Google Scholar
de López, K. M. J. (2007). Bcuaa quiaa — I stepped HEAD orange peel! The acquisition of Zapotec bodypart locatives. In Pfeiler, B. (Ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica (pp. 155–182). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K. (1996). The prosodic structure of early words. In Morgan, J. L. & Demuth, K. (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, pp. 171–184. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (2001). Prosodic constraints on morphological development. In Weissenborn, J. & Höhle, B. (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (pp. 3–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K. (2014). Prosodic licensing and the development of phonological and morphological representations. In Farris-Trimble, A. W. & Barlow, J. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on phonological theory and development: In honor of Daniel A. Dinnsen (pp. 11–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echols, C., & Newport, E. (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition 2, 189–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32, 429–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fee, E. J. (1995). Segments and syllables in early language acquisition. In Archibald, J. (Ed.), Phonological acquisition and phonological theory (pp. 43–61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Forrester, N., & Plunkett, K. (2012). Learning the Arabic plural: the case of minority default mappings in connectionist networks. In Ram, A. & Eiselt, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 319–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Forshaw, W., Davidson, L., Kelly, B., Nordlinger, R., Wigglesworth, G., & Blythe, J. (2017). The acquisition of Murrinhpatha (Northern Australia). In Fortescue, M., Mithun, M., & Evans, N. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis (pp. 437–494). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gagarina, N., & Voeikova, M. (2009). Acquisition of case and number in Russian. In Stephany, U., & Voeikova, M. D. (Eds.), Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 179–215). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., Sebastián, E., & Soto, P. (1999). The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: Across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge? International Journal of Bilingualism 3(2/3), 133–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. (1996). Prosodic structure in young children's language production. Language 72, 682–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, L., & Bartholomew, D. (1979). Pame Noun Inflection. International Journal of American Linguistics 45, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gvozdev, A. N. (1949). Formirovaniye u rebenka grammaticheskogo stroya. Moscow, Akademija Pedagogika Nauk RSFSR.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997). A crosslinguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition 62, 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. (1989). First language acquisition: Method, description and explanation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ketrez, F. N., & Aksu-Koç, A. (2009). Early nominal morphology in Turkish: Emergence of case and number. In Stephany, U., & Voeikova, M. D. (Eds.), Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 15–48). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, E., Sandra, D., Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Martens, E. (2007). Dutch plural inflection: the exception that proves the analogy. Cognitive Psychology 54, 283–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köpcke, K. M. (1998). The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language 25(2), 293–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lahiri, A. (2001). Metrical patterns. Language Typology and Language Universals 13, 47–67.Google Scholar
Lillehaugen, B. D. (2003). The categorial status of body part prepositions in Valley Zapotec Languages (Unpublished M.A. thesis). Department of Linguistics, UCLA.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M., & Chalkley, M. A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Children's language (pp. 127–214). New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F. (1995). Children's overregularization of English plurals: a quantitative analysis. Journal of Child Language 22, 447–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mithun, M. (1989). The acquisition of polysynthesis. Journal of Child Language 16, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, M. (2006). The interaction between metrical structure and tone in Kera. Phonology 23, 259–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiler, B. (2002). Noun and verb acquisition in Yucatec Maya. In M. D. Voeikova & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), Pre- and Protomorphology: Early phases of mophological development in nouns and verbs (pp. 75-82). Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 29. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28, 73–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plunkett, K., & Nakisa, R. C. (1997). A connectionist model of the Arabic plural system. Language and Cognitive Processes 12(5/6), 807–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C. (1983). Mayan telegraphese: Intonational determinants of inflectional development in Quiché Mayan. Language 59, 583–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C. (2017). The comparative method of language acquisition research. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C. (2020). Documenting the acquisition of indigenous languages. Journal of Child Language. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000318.Google ScholarPubMed
Pye, C., Ingram, D., & List, H. (1987). A comparison of initial consonant acquisition in English and Quiché. In Nelson, Keith and van Kleeck, Anne (Eds.), Children's language, vol. 6 (pp. 175–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pye, C., Berthiaume, S., & Pfeiler, B. (2019). Northern Pame-Spanish language acquisition in the context of incipient language loss. International Journal of Bilingualism 24(2), 246–265. [doi.org/10.1177/1367006919826328].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Räsänen, S. H. M., Ambridge, B., & Pine, J. M. (2014). Infinitives or bare stems? Are English-speaking children defaulting to the highest frequency form? Journal of Child Language 26(3), 577–618.Google Scholar
Räsänen, S. H. M., Ambridge, B., & Pine, J. M. (2015). An elicited-production study of inflectional verb morphology in child Finnish. Cognitive Science 40(7), 1704–1738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubino, R. B., & Pine, J. M. (1998). Subject-verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: what low error rates hide. Journal of Child Language 25(1), 35–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savickienė, I. (2003). The acquisition of Lithuanian noun morphology. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savičiūtė, E., Ambridge, B., & Pine, J. M. (2018). The roles of word-form frequency and phonological neighbourhood density in the acquisition of Lithuanian noun morphology. Journal of Child Language 45(3), 641–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A., & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–208). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. P., & Lee, F. (2007). San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec Speech Acquisition. In MacLeod, S. (Ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Stephany, U., & Voeikova, M. D. (Eds.) (2009). Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106(1), 23–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. (2003). Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English. Journal of Child Language 30, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed