Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T01:42:22.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between age and MLU in young children: a second look at Klee and Fitzgerald's data*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Susan Conant
Susan Conant*
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Educational Problems, Cambridge, Massachusetts
*
Research Institute for Educational Problems, 29 Ware St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 169 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

The author would especially like to thank Thomas Klee for his helpful comments on an early draft of this paper. The author is also grateful for the support of Grant G008400631 from the Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R. (1973) A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klee, T. & Fitzgerald, M. D. (1985) The relation between grammatical development and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Child Language 12, 251–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. F. & Chapman, R. S. (1981) The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24. 154–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed