Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T21:02:21.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A morphemic measure of early language development: data from modern Hebrew*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Esther Dromi  and
Ruth A. Berman
Esther Dromi
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
Ruth A. Berman
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given the nature of Hebrew as a highly synthetic language with rich bound morphology, an attempt was made to establish a measure corresponding to the MLU for a language such as English. The method of calculating MPU (morpheme-per-utterance) which is described here was tried out on 38 Hebrew-speaking children aged 2;0 to 3;0, and measured for internal consistency against different types of elicitation procedures, and for validity by comparison with the subjects' performance on a specially-devised measure of syntactic–semantic development. The results clearly indicate that the MPU is a useful developmental index of the linguistic proficiency of two- to three-year-old Hebrew speakers. Implications of this finding for intra-linguistic and cross-linguistic evaluation are then discussed.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 403 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

The authors are indebted to Peter de Villiers for detailed discussions invaluable to the issues considered here, and to Dan I. Slobin for his important comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Address for correspondence: E. Dromi, School of Education, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel 69978.

References

REFERENCES

Antinucci, F. & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. JChLang 3. 167–89.Google Scholar
Berman, R. (1978 a). Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing.Google Scholar
Berman, R. (1978 b). Early verbs: comments on how and why a child uses his first words. Psycholing 5. 21–39.Google Scholar
Berman, R. (1982). Verb-pattern alternation: the interface of morphology, syntax, and semantics in Hebrew child language. JChLang 9. 1.Google Scholar
Berman, R. (to appear). Acquisition of Hebrew as a native tongue. In Slobin, D. (ed.), Cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berman, R., Hecht, B. & Clark, E. V. (1982). Acquisition of word-formation devices in Hebrew: agent and instrument nouns. Paper read at Stanford Child Language Forum.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lightbown, P. & Hood, L. (1973). Conventions for transcription of child language recordings. Teachers' College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of inflection in child language. Lg 56. 386–412.Google Scholar
Bolozky, S. (1978). Word-formation strategies in the Hebrew verb system. Afroasiatic linguistics 5 (3).Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Early syntactic development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1974). Learning the structure of causative verbs: a study in the relationship of cognitive, semantic, and syntactic development. PRCLD 8. 142–78.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1977). The acquisition of rules governing ‘possible lexical items’: evidence from spontaneous speech errors. PRCLD 13. 148–56.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1978). Uniformity, individual variation, and shifts over time in patterns of acquisition. In Minifie, F. D. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Communicative and cognitive abilities:early behavioral assessment. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1979). Starting to talk worse: clues to language acquisition from children's late speech errors. To appear in Strauss, S. (ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (in press). Cross-cultural perspectives on language development. In Triandis, H. C. (ed.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? PsychRev 65. 14–21.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. H. (1979) Child morphology and morphophonemic change. Linguistics 17. 25–50.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. ChDev 39. 433–9.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1979). Building a vocabulary: words for objects, actions, and relations. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1974) Review of R. Brown, A first language. JChLang 1. 289–307.Google Scholar
Crystal, D., Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (1976). The grammatical analysis of language disability: a procedure for assessment and remediation. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Dale, P. (1976). Language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Davis, B. B. & Seitz, S. (1975) Pronoun assessment: a free speech technique. JSHR 18. 754–64.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. & Baker, W. J. (1979). Recent research on acquisition of English morphology. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. JPsycholingRes 2. 267–78.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. (to appear). Methods for the study of language acquisition. In Vasta, R. (ed.), Techniques and strategies for child study. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Drarina, V. R. (1973). On the emergence of inflection in child language: a contribution based on Latvian speech data. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Dromi, E. (1977). MLU as a measure of language development in Hebrew-speaking children aged 2 to 3. M.A. thesis, Tel Aviv University (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Dromi, E. (1979). More on the acquisition of locative prepositions: an analysis of Hebrew data. JChLang 6. 547–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Dromi, E. (1980). Measures of early language development. Paper presented at 7th annual conference of Israel Association of Applied Linguistics (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Edwards, A. L. (1950). Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Goshen, R. & Eyal, S. (1976). Order of acquisition of types of questions in Hebrew. DASH: Speech & hearing 7. 13–16 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Grosu, A. (1969). The isomorphism of semantic and syntactic categories. Hebrew Computational Linguistics 1. 34–50.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. & Tomblin, B. (1975). The reality of developmental sentence scoring as a function of sample size. JSHR 18. 372–81.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (in prep.). Developmental sequencing in the acquisition of Hebrew morpho-syntax at the early stages. MA. thesis, Tel Aviv University (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). Language as a formal problem-space for children. Paper presented at the MPG/NIAS conference on ‘Beyond description in child language’,Nijmegen,Holland,June 1979.Google Scholar
Lee, L. & Canter, S. (1971). Developmental sentence scoring: a clinical procedure for estimating syntactic development in children's spontaneous speech. JSHD 36. 315–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L. B., Bolders, J. C. & Miller, J. A. (1976). An examination of the semantic relations reflected in the language usage of normal and language-disordered children. JSHR 19. 371–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, Y. (1980). Gender in children's language: a study in first language acquisition. Ph.D. thesis, Hebrew University, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Longhurst, T. M. & Schrandt, T. A. M. (1973). Linguistic analysis of children's speech: a comparison of four procedures. JSHD 38. 240–50.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1969). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1975). Rules, rote, and analogy in morphological formations by Hungarian children. JChLang 2. 65–78.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monogr.Soc.Res.Ch.Devel. Serial No. 174. Vol. 43, Nos. 1–2.Google Scholar
Morehead, D. M. & Ingram, D. (1973). The development of base syntax in normal and linguistically deviant children. JSHR 16. 330–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, A. (1980). The units of language acquisition. Working Papers in Linguistics 12. University of Hawaii, Manoa.Google Scholar
Popova, M. I. (1973). Grammatical elements of language in the speech of preschool children. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I., (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (1978). Processes of word-formation in the noun and adjective system of Modern Hebrew. M.A. thesis, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Sharf, R. (1972). Some relationships between measures of early language development. JSHR 37. 64–74.Google Scholar
Shriner, T. H. (1969). A review of mean length of response as a measure of expressive language development in children. JSHR 34. 61–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1981). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In Gleitman, L. R. & Wanner, E. (eds), Language acquisition: state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (ed.) (to appear), Cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Walden, Z. (in prep.). Children's construals of word-formation processes in Hebrew. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar