Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sq2k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T14:38:16.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FURTHER EVIDENCE OF AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN LOW SECOND-TO-FOURTH DIGIT RATIO (2D:4D) AND SELECTION FOR THE UNIFORMED SERVICES: A STUDY AMONG POLICE PERSONNEL IN WROCŁAW, POLAND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2017

Sławomir Kozieł ,
Marek Kociuba ,
Raja Chakraborty ,
Aneta Sitek  and
Zofia Ignasiak
Sławomir Kozieł
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Science, Wrocław, Poland
Marek Kociuba
Affiliation:
General Tadeusz Kościuszko Military Academy of Land Forces, Wrocław, Poland
Raja Chakraborty*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Dinabandhu Mahavidyalaya, Bongaon, West Bengal, India
Aneta Sitek
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Łódź, Poland
Zofia Ignasiak
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physical Education, University School of Physical Education in Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland
*
1Corresponding author. Email: rajanth2003@yahoo.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Males and females differ in their preference for occupations and sporting activities, and differ also in risk-taking attitudes. In addition to other explanations, prenatal hormone exposure has been implicated in these gender-associated differences. The ratio of the relative lengths of the second-to-fourth digits (2D:4D) is a proxy indicator of prenatal exposure to testosterone relative to oestrogen. The 2D:4D ratio has been found to be associated with choice of occupation, particularly among females. This study investigated whether 2D:4D differed between police officers and a control group of civilians in Wrocław, Poland. Participants were 147 male and 55 female police officers and 91 male and 75 female civilian controls. The police officers had to undergo rigorous physical ability tests during recruitment and their job bore relatively higher risk, whereas the controls had a normal civilian lifestyle. Height, weight, hand grip strength and lengths of the second and fourth digits were measured. Analyses of variance and covariance were employed to assess the significance of difference in digit ratio between groups (police officers and civilians) allowing for interaction with sex. The policewomen, compared with the female controls, were taller and had stronger hand grip strength, but had lower 2D:4D in the right hand and average 2D:4D of both hands. However, male and female police officers slightly differed only in the right hand digit ratio but not in the left hand ratio or the average for the two hands. However, the control group showed significant sex differences in all digit ratios with higher (feminine) mean values in females. The study provides further evidence that prenatal testosterone exposure, as reflected in the 2D:4D ratio, might have an association with choice of occupation, particularly among females.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , July 2018 , pp. 527 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., Campbell, B., Gray, P. B., Hoffman, M. & Little, A. C. (2008) Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evolution and Human Behaviour 29, 384–390.Google Scholar
Auger, J., Le Denmat, D., Berges, R., Doridot, L., Salmon, B., Canivenc-Lavier, M. C. & Eustache, F. (2013) Environmental levels of oestrogenic and anti-androgenic compounds feminize digit ratios in male rats and their unexposed male progeny. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 280, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.Google Scholar
Austin, E. J., Manning, J. T., McInroy, K. & Mathews, E. (2012) A preliminary investigation of the association between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio. Personality and Individual Differences 33, 1115.Google Scholar
Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Ashwin, E., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., Hackett, G. & Hines, M. (2009) Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behaviour in girls and in boys. Psychological Science 20, 144–148.Google Scholar
Ball, S., Eckel, C. & Heracleous, M. (2010) Risk aversion and physical prowess: prediction, choice and bias. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 41, 167–193.Google Scholar
Beltz, A. M., Swanson, J. L. & Berenbaum, S. A. (2011) Gendered occupational interests: prenatal androgen effects on psychological orientation to Things versus People. Hormones and Behaviour 60, 313–317.Google Scholar
Brosnan, M. J. (2006) Digit ratio and faculty membership: implications for the relationship between prenatal testosterone and academia. British Journal of Psychology 97, 455–466.Google Scholar
Brown, W. M., Finn, C. J., Bradley, M. C. & Breedlove, S. M. (2002) Differences in finger length ratios between self-identifies “butch” and “femme” lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 31, 123–127.Google Scholar
Cashdan, E. (2003) Hormones and competitive aggression in women. Aggressive Behaviour 29, 107–115.Google Scholar
Cohen-Bendahan, C. C., van de Beek, C. & Berenbaum, S. A. (2005) Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behaviour: methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehaviour Review 29, 353–384.Google Scholar
Csatho, A., Osvath, A., Bicsak, E., Karadi, K., Manning, J. & Kallai, J. (2003a) Sex role identity related to the ratio of second to fourth digit length in women. Biological Psychology 62, 147–156.Google Scholar
Csatho, A., Osvath, A., Karadi, K., Bicsak, E., Manning, J. & Kallai, J. (2003b) Spatial navigation related to the ratio of second to fourth digit length in women. Learning and Individual Differences 13, 239–249.Google Scholar
Dabbs, J. M. Jr, Alford, E. C. & Fielden, J. A. (1998) Trial lawyers and testosterone: blue-collar talent in a white-collar world. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28, 84–94.Google Scholar
Daruvala, D. (2007) Gender, risk and stereotypes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 35, 265–283.Google Scholar
Durdiakova, J. & Ostatnikova, J. P. C. (2011) Testosterone and its metabolites – modulators of brain functions. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 71, 434–454.Google Scholar
Dworkin, S. L. (2001) “Holding back”: negotiating a glass ceiling on women’s muscular strength. Sociological Perspectives 44, 333–350.Google Scholar
Eisenegger, C., Haushofer, J. & Fehr, E. (2011) The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15, 264–271.Google Scholar
ENP (2017) European Network of Policewomen. URL: http://www.enp.eu/countries/poland/ (accessed 26th February 2017).Google Scholar
Ertuğrul, B. (2013) Sexually dimorphic human body fat distribution and second-to-fourth digit ratio. Eurasian Journal of Anthropology 3, 54–62.Google Scholar
Fink, B., Neave, N., Laughton, K. & Manning, J. T. (2006) Second to fourth digit ratio and sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences 41, 1253–1262.Google Scholar
Franken, R. E., Hill, R. & Kierstead, J. (1994) Sport interest as predicted by the personality measures of competitiveness, mastery, instrumentality, expressivity and sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences 17, 167–176.Google Scholar
Frisén, L., Nordenström, A., Falhammar, H., Filipsson, H., Holmdahl, G., Janson, P. O. et al. (2009) Gender role behaviour, sexuality, and psychosocial adaptation in women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to CYP21A2 deficiency. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 94, 3432–3439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garbarino, E., Slonim, R. & Sydnor, J. (2011) Digit ratios (2D:4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainties 42, 1–26.Google Scholar
Galis, F., Ten Broek, C. M., Van Dongen, S. & Wijnaendts, L. C. (2010) Sexual dimorphism in the prenatal digit ratio. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 39, 57–62.Google Scholar
Goodyear, M. D. E., Krleza-Jeric, K. & Lemmens, T. (2007) The Declaration of Helsinki. British Medical Journal 335, 624–625.Google Scholar
Govier, E. (2003) Brainsex and occupation: the role of serendipity in the genesis of an idea. Journal of Managerial Psychology 18, 440–452.Google Scholar
Hines, M. (2000) Gonadal hormones and sexual differentiation of human behaviour: effects on psychosexual and cognitive development. In Matsumoto, A. (ed.) Sexual Differentiation of the Brain. CRC Press, Florida, pp. 257–278.Google Scholar
Hönekopp, J. (2011) Relationships between digit ratio 2D:4D and self-reported aggression and risk taking in an online study. Personality and Individual Differences 51, 77–80.Google Scholar
Hönekopp, J. & Schuster, M. (2010) A meta-analysis on 2D:4D and athletic prowess: substantial relationships but neither hand out-predicts the other. Personality and Individual Differences 48, 4–10.Google Scholar
Huh, H. R. (2012) Born to be a marine: digit ratio and military service. Personality and Individual Differences 53, 166–168.Google Scholar
Kozieł, S., Chakraborty, R. & Sitek, A. (2013) Second to fourth digits ratio (2D:4D) and subjective pain experience in tattooing. Anthropological Review 76, 117–124.Google Scholar
Koziel, S., Kociuba, M., Ignasiak, Z. & Chakraborty, R. (2016) Is sports choice and participation related to 2D:4D? A study among adult male students in Wrocław, Poland. Collegium Antropologicum 40, 105–110.Google Scholar
Kociuba, M., Kozieł, S. & Chakraborty, R. (2016) Sex differences in digit ratio (2D:4D) among military and civil cohorts at a military academy in Wrocław, Poland. Journal of Biosocial Science 48(5), 658–671.Google Scholar
Kociuba, M., Kozieł, S., Chakraborty, R. & Ignasiak, Z. (2017) Sports preference and digit ratio (2D:4D) among female students in Wrocław, Poland. Journal of Biosocial Science 49(5), 622–632.Google Scholar
Krane, V., Waldron, J., Michalenok, J. & Stiles-Shipley, J. (2001) Body image, and eating and exercise behaviours: a feminist cultural studies perspective. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal 10, 17–54.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. & Shubel, E. (2002) Relative lengths of fingers and toes in human males and females. Hormones and Behavior 42, 492–500.Google Scholar
McIntyre, M. H., Ellison, P. T., Lieberman, D. E., Demerath, E. & Towne, B. (2005) The development of sex differences in digital formula from infancy in the Fels Longitudinal Study. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 272, 1473–1479.Google Scholar
Malas, M. A., Dogan, S., Evcil, E. H. & Desdicioglu, K. (2006) Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Human Development 82, 469–4675.Google Scholar
Manning, J. T., Bundred, P. E., Newton, D. J. & Flanagan, B. F. (2003) The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene. Evolution and Human Behaviour 24, 399–405.Google Scholar
Manning, J. T., Reimers, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. & Fink, B. (2010) Sexually dimorphic traits (digit ratio, height, systemizing-empathizing scores) and gender segregation between occupations. Evidence from the BBC internet study. Personality and Individual Differences 49, 511–515.Google Scholar
Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J. & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998) The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction 13, 3000–3004.Google Scholar
Manning, J. T., Stewart, A., Bundred, P. E. & Trivers, R. L. (2004) Sex and ethnic differences in 2nd to 4th digit ratio of children. Early Human Development 80, 161–168.Google Scholar
Manning, J. T. & Taylor, R. P. (2001) 2nd to 4th digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behaviour 22, 61–69.Google Scholar
Manning, J. T., Trivers, R. L., Thornhill, R. & Singh, D. (2000) The 2nd:4th digit ratio and asymmetry of hand performance in Jamaican children. Laterality 5, 121–132.Google Scholar
Szwed, A., Kosinska, M. & Manning, J. (2017) Digit ratio (2D:4D) and month of birth: a link to the solstitial-melatonin-testosterone effect. Early Human Development 104, 23–26.Google Scholar
Trivers, R., Hopp, R. & Manning, J. (2013) A longitudinal study of digit ratio (2d:4d) and its relationships with adult running speed in Jamaicans. Human Biology 85, 623–626.Google Scholar
Trivers, R., Manning, J. & Jacobson, A. (2006) A longitudinal study of digit ratio (2D:4D) and other finger ratios in Jamaican children. Hormones and Behavior 49, 150–156.Google Scholar
Van Dongen, S. (2009) Second to fourth digit ratio in relation to age, BMI and life history in a population of young adults: a set of unexpected results. Journal of Negative Results 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
Voracek, M., Pum, U. & Dressler, S. G. (2010) Investigating digit ratio (2D:4D) in a highly male-oriented occupation: the case of firefighters. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 51, 146–156.Google Scholar
Voracek, M., Reimer, B., Ertl, C. & Dressler, S. G. (2006) Digit ratio (2D:4D), lateral preferences, and performance in fencing. Perception and Motor Skills 103, 427–446.Google Scholar
Weis, S. E., Firker, A. & Hennig, J. (2007) Associations between the second to fourth digit ratio and career interests. Personality and Individual Differences 43, 485–493.Google Scholar
White, R. E., Thornhill, S. & Hampson, E. (2007) A biosocial model of entrepreneurship: the combined effects of nurture and nature. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 28, 451–466.Google Scholar
Williams, T. J., Pepitone, M. E., Christensen, S. E., Cooke, B. M., Huberman, A. D., Breedlove, N. J. et al. (2000) Finger length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature 404, 455–456.Google Scholar
Zhao, D., Yu, K., Zhang, X. & Zheng, L. (2013) Digit ratio (2D:4D) and handgrip strength in Hani ethnicity. PLoS One 8, e77958.Google Scholar
Zheng, Z. & Cohn, M. J. (2011) Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108, 16289–16294.Google Scholar