Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T05:48:40.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biosocial variances and infant survival: a path analysis approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Ann Stirling Frisch ,
David J. Kallen ,
Robert J. Griffore  and
Eugene A. Dolanski
Ann Stirling Frisch
Affiliation:
Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
David J. Kallen
Affiliation:
Michigan State University and East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Robert J. Griffore
Affiliation:
Michigan State University and East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Eugene A. Dolanski
Affiliation:
E. W. Sparrow Hospital, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study used path analysis to assess the chances of survival of babies in a neonatal intensive care unit in Lansing, Michigan, USA. Two paths to neonatal survival were identified and the variables accounted for 20% of the variance in gestational age. The first path showed that prior infant losses were negatively correlated with gestational age while in the second path, gestational age showed negative relationships with pre-pregnancy weight and household job worries.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 175 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dietrich, K. N., Krafft, K. M., Bornschein, R. L., Hammond, P. L., Berger, O., Succop, P. A. & Bier, M. (1987) Low level fetal lead exposure effects on neurobehavioral development in infancy. Pediatrics, 80, 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisner, V., Brazie, J. V., Pratt, M. W. & Hexter, A. C. (1979) The risk of low birth weight. Am. J. publ. Hlth, 69, 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, A. B. (1984) The effect of maternal age, panty and prenatal care on perinatal outcome in adolescent mothers. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 149, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fein, G. G., Jacobson, J. L., Jacobson, S. W., Schwartz, P. M. & Dowler, J. K. (1984) Prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls: effects on birth size and gestational age. J. Pediatr. 105, 315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garn, S. M. & Pesick, S. D. (1982) Relationship between various maternal body mass measures and size of the newborn. Am. J. clin. Nutr. 56, 664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, L. & Murphy, D. P. (1929) Etiology of ill-health of children born after maternal pelvic irradiation. II. Defective children born after postconception pelvic irradiation. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium. Ther. nucl. Med. 22, 322.Google Scholar
Gortmaker, S. L. (1979) The effects of prenatal care upon the health of the newborn. Am J. publ. Hlth, 69, 653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, R. S. (1983) The impact of prenatal care in different social groups. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 145, 780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. E. (1982) Prenatal medical care and infant mortality. In: Economic Aspects of Health, pp. 15–52. Edited by Fuchs, V.. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kessner, D. M., Singer, J., Kalk, C. E. & Schlesinger, E. R. (1973) Infant Death: An Analysis of Maternal Risk and Health Care. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. (1959) Problems in methodology. In: Sociology Today. Edited by Merton, R. K.. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Miller, R. W. (1956) Delayed effects occurring within the first decade after exposure of young individuals to the Hiroshima atomic bomb. Pediatrics, 18, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascoe, J. M., Chessare, J., Baugh, E., Ulrich, L. & Ialongo, N. (1987) Help with prenatal Household tasks and newborn birth weight: is there an association?. J. dev. behav. Pediatr. 8, 207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peoples, M. D., Grimson, R. C. & Daughtry, G. L. (1984) Evaluation of the effects of the North Carolina improved pregnancy outcome project: implications for state level decision making. Am. J. publ. Hlth, 74, 549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogan, W. J., Gladen, B. C., Hung, K-L., Koong, S-L. [, Shih, L-Y., Taylor, J. S., Wu, Y-C, Wang, D., Ragan, N. B. & Hsu, C-C. (1988) Congenital poisoning by polychlorinated biphenyls and their contaminants in Taiwan. Science, N. Y. 241, 334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, G. M., Sweeney, P. J. & Solola, A. S. (1980) Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 137, 876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxen, L. & Rapola, J. (1969) Congenital Defects. Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Shah, F. K. & Abbey, H. (1971) Effects of some factors on neonatal and postneonatal mortality. Milbank meml Fund Q. Bull. 49, 33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, W. R. (1988) Human health consequences of consumption of fish contaminated with organochlorine compounds. Acquatic Toxicol. 11, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terris, M. & Gold, E. M. (1969) An epidemiological study of prematurity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 103, 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, P. H., First, L. R., Lamb, G. H., Kotelchuck, M., Chen, D. W., Ewing, A., Hersee, H. & Rideout, J. (1988) Infant mortality increase despite high access to tertiary care: an evolving relationship among infant mortality, health care and socioeconomic change. Pediatrics, 81, 542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed