Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T06:15:03.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Availability of marriage partners in England and Wales: a comparison of three measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Richard Lampard
Richard Lampard
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Warwick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Measures of partner availability introduced by Goldman, Westoff & Hammerslough (1984) and by Veevers (1988) are described and a new measure of partner availability, the Iterated Availability Ratio, is introduced. The three measures are applied to 1981 Census data for England and Wales and their abilities to predict regional variations in age-specific marriage rates are compared.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 1993 , pp. 333 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © 1993, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akers, D. (1967) On measuring the marriage squeeze. Demography, 4, 907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fossett, M. & Kiecolt, J. (1991) A methodological review of the sex ratio: alternatives for comparative research. J. Marr. Fam. 53, 941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D. (1965) Fertility and fertility differentials: some observations on recent changes in the United States. In: Public Health and Population Change. Edited by Sheps, M & Ridley, J. Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Goldman, N., Westoff, C. & Hammerslough, C. (1984) Demography of the marriage market in the United States. Popul. Ind. 50, 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guttentag, M. & Secord, P. (1983) Too Many Women: Demography, Sex and Family. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Henry, L. (1972) Nuptiality. Theor. Popul. B, 3, 135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschman, C. & Matras, J. (1971) A new look at the marriage market and nuptiality rates, 1915–1958. Demography, 8, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcfarland, D. (1972) Comparison of alternative marriage models. In: Population Dynamics. Edited by Grenville, T. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
McFarland, D. (1975) Models of marriage formation and fertility. Social Forces, 54, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, W. (1983) The Great American Man Shortage. Rawson, New York.Google Scholar
Opcs (1977) Population Estimates 1975/1976. Series PP1 No. 2. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Opcs. (1983a) Census 1981: Sex, Age and Marital Status: Great Britain. CEN 81 SAM. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Opcs. (1983b) Regional Migration. Series RM. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Opcs. (1984) Marriage and Divorce Statistics 1981: England and Wales. Series FM2 No. 8. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Schoen, R. (1977) A two-sex nuptiality–mortality life table. Demography, 14, 333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
South, S. & Lloyd, K. (1992a) Marriage markets and nonmarital fertility in the United States. Demography, 29, 247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
South, S. & Lloyd, K. (1992b) Marriage opportunities and family formation: further implications of imbalanced sex ratios. J. Marr. Fam. 54, 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veevers, J. (1988) The ‘real’ marriage squeeze: mate selection, mortality and the mating gradient. Sociol. Persp. 31, 169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed