Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-4rns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-28T23:46:25.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interests, Wireless Technology, and Institutional Change: From Government Monopoly to Regulated Competition in Indian Telecommunications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2009

Rahul Mukherji
Get access

Abstract

This paper explores the causes behind the institutional change that promoted regulated private-sector competition in India's booming telecommunications sector. This change occurred incrementally by resolving conflicts of interest driven by the twin engines of fiscal crisis and technological change in cellular telephony. The Prime Minister's Office and the Ministry of Finance pushed for the change, whereas the Department of Telecommunications resisted it. As private participation succeeded, the relationship between the private sector and government financial organizations made a significant impact on parts of the government that favored change. Cellular technology offered the private sector with a first-mover's advantage because it had gambled on it when government-owned corporations had ignored its commercial potential. Evolutionary change occurred through a process of institutional layering that involved establishing new institutions along the edges of old ones and allowing them to grow differentially. The pace of institutional change accelerated in times of financial crises when the mismatch between policy intention and institutions led to a withdrawal of private investment.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 491 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

List of References

Athreya, M. B. 1996. “India's Telecommunications Policy.” Telecommunications Policy 20 (1): 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajpai, Manjul, and Hans, Anjali. 2005. Report: Overview of the Indian Experience Regarding Fixed Line Operators Acquiring Mobility via Wireless in Local Loop (WLL). New Delhi: Cellular Operators Association of India.Google Scholar
Bhaduri, Amit, and Nayyar, Deepak. 1996. The Intelligent Person's Guide to Liberalization. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
Blyth, Marc. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Industrial Costs and Prices (BICP). 1998. BICP Study on the Cellular Phone Services. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdary, T. H. 2000. “Telecom Demonopolization: Policy or Farce?” Economic and Political Weekly, February 5, 436–40.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. 1990. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–37.Google Scholar
Delhi High Court. 1998. Union of India v. TRAI. Judgment of Usha Mehra, July 23, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Department of Telecommunications (DOT). 1994. The National Telecom Policy 1994. New Delhi: Ministry of Communications. http://www.trai.gov.in/TelecomPolicy_ntp94.asp [accessed January 28, 2009].Google Scholar
Department of Telecommunications (DOT). 1999. New Telecom Policy 1999. New Delhi: Ministry of Communications. http://www.trai.gov.in/TelecomPolicy_ntp99.asp [accessed January 28, 2009].Google Scholar
Department of Telecommunications (DOT). 2005. Annual Report 2003–2004. New Delhi: Ministry of Communications. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN020712.pdf [accessed January 28, 2009].Google Scholar
Desai, Ashok V. 2006. India's Telecommunications Industry: History, Analysis, and Diagnosis. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Dokeniya, Anupama. 1999. “Reforming the State: Telecom Liberalization in India.” Telecommunications Policy 23 (2): 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 1998a. “MTNL Plans Cellular Service in Delhi, Bombay.” EIU ViewsWire, January 7.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 1998b. “More Telecoms Trouble.” EIU ViewsWire, March 4.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 1998c. “Telecoms Authority's Wings Clipped.” EIU ViewsWire, August 5.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 1999a. “New Telecoms Policy In Pipeline.” EIU ViewsWire, January 13.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 1999b. “Government Passes New Telecoms Policy.” EIU ViewsWire, May 10.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 1999c. “A Telecom Truce Is Called.” EIU ViewsWire, June 30.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 1999d. “Government Intent on Telecoms Bailout Package.” EIU ViewsWire, July 23.Google Scholar
Garret, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1995. “Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework.” In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, ed. Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O, 3–30. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grief, Avner, and Laitin, David D.. 2004. “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 633–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Rajni. 2002. “Telecommunications Liberalization: Critical Role of Legal and Regulatory Regime.” Economic and Political Weekly, April 27, 1679–90.Google Scholar
Gupta, Surajeet Das. 2004. “The WLL Letters.” Business Standard (New Delhi), October–November, 12–15.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2005. “Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of U.S. Welfare State Retrenchment.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen, 40–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Limited (ICICI). 1998. Draft Report to the Department of Telecommunications: State Cellular Projects—Assessment of Viability. Mumbai: Government of India.Google Scholar
Joshi, Vijay, and Little, I. M. D.. 1994. India: Macroeconomics and Political Economy, 1964–1991. Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, Devesh, and Mehta, Pratap B.. 2005. Public Institutions in India: Performance and Design. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mukherji, Rahul. 2004. “Managing Competition: Politics and the Building of Independent Regulatory Institutions.” India Review 3 (4): 278–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherji, Rahul. 2007. India's Economic Transition: The Politics of Reforms. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mukherji, Rahul. 2008. “The Politics of Telecommunications Regulation: State-Industry Alliance Favoring Foreign Investment in India.” Journal of Development Studies 44 (10): 1405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Task Force on Information Technology and Software Development. 1998. IT Taskforce—Basic Background Report, Chapter VII. New Delhi: Government of India. http://it-taskforce.nic.in/bgr7.htm [accessed January 28, 2009].Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1995. “The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development.” In The New Institutional Economics and the Third World, ed. Harriss, John, Hunter, Janet, and Lewis, Colin M., 17–26. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49 (4): 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, Charles. 2002. Organizing America: Wealth, Power, and the Origins of Corporate Capitalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Petrazzini, Ben A. 1996. “Telecommunications Policy in India.” Telecommunications Policy 20 (1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48 (2): 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 253–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda. 2002. “Historical Institutions in Contemporary Political Science.” In Political Science: State of the Discipline, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., 693–721. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1983. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” In International Regimes, ed. Krasner, Stephen D., 195–232. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Saha, Biswatosh. 2004. “State Support for R and D in Developing Countries: Telecom Equipment Industry in India and China,” Economic and Political Weekly, August 28, 3917–21.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 1999. Leapfrogging Development: The Political Economy of Telecommunications Restructuring. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sinha, Nikhil. 1996. “The Political Economy of India's Telecommunications Reforms.” Telecommunications Policy 20 (1): 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen, 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of India. 1996. Delhi Science Forum v. Union of India. Judgment of N. P. Singh and K. Venkataswami, February 19, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of India. 2002. Cellular Operators of India versus Union of India. Judgment of G. B. Pattanaik, December 17, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Swaminathan, Rajesh. 1997. “Functioning Anarchy: India's National Telecommunications Policy and the Development of Basic Telephone Services.” Columbia Journal of Asian Law 11 (2): 393–433.Google Scholar
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT). 2003a. A. Cellular Operators of India v, Union of India. Judgment of D. P. Wadhwa, August 8, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT). 2003b. B. Cellular Operators of India v. Union of India. R. U. S. Prasad and P. R. Dasgupta, majority opinion, August 8, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). 2001. Recommendation on Issues Relating to “Limited Mobility” through Wireless in Local Loop in the Access Network by Basic Service Providers. New Delhi: Government of India. http://www.trai.gov.in/Default.aspGoogle Scholar
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). 2003. Recommendations on Unified Licensing, New Delhi: Government of India. http://www.trai.gov.in/Default.asp.Google Scholar
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). 2006. Study Paper on Telecom Industry in India and China. New Delhi: Government of India. http://www.trai.gov.in/Default.aspGoogle Scholar
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). 2007. “Highest Ever Subscriber Addition in the Financial Year.” News release no. 39, April 23. http://www.trai.gov.in/Default.aspGoogle Scholar
Vittal, N. 2004. “Sri N. Vittal on NTP-94.” Journal of the CTMS 13 (5): 5–15.Google Scholar