Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-zv2rg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-12T19:15:13.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A necessary condition for extinction in those bisexual Galton-Watson branching processes governed by superadditive mating functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

David M. Hull
David M. Hull*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mating functions considered by Asmussen (1980) and Daley (1968) for the class of bisexual Galton-Watson branching processes (GWBP) are shown to be superadditive. Consideration of a process that allows only sibling mating leads to a necessary condition for almost sure extinction in bisexual GWBP governed by superadditive mating functions. A simple example shows that the condition is not sufficient.

Keywords

BISEXUAL GALTON-WATSON BRANCHING PROCESSSIBLING-MATING-ONLY BRANCHING PROCESSEXTINCTION IN A PROCESSSUPERADDITIVE TWO-PLACE FUNCTION

Information

Type
Short Communications
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 847 - 850
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1982 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Research partly done at the University of Illinois at Chicago Circle.

References

Asmussen, S. (1980) On some two-sex population models. Ann. Prob. 8, 727–744.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J. (1968a) Extinction conditions for certain bisexual Galton-Watson branching processes. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 9, 315–322.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J. (1968b) Stochastically monotone Markov chains. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 10, 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar